I don't understand is this video pro climate change or anti climate change?

^Try watching with volume the next few times.

I'm confused. At what point do they eat a sammich?

1) Nice.
2) We can't get anyone to pay attention to the destruction of our environment, what should we do?...
Hot chicks.

Wait, did they just say that they'll take off the rest if we get our politicians to act?

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

Wait... this is confused.

OK, so they start off with the 'man, it's hot in here'... which is because of global warming... so they start taking their clothes off... which would suggest that climate change is a GOOD thing... so why stop it?

But then they change to saying that it's good to use less... so, wait... is that why they're taking their clothes off... because it's... um... using more of something to wear them, not because it's hot like they started saying... so... by reducing carbon we're going to make it more comfortable for them to be naked... except that would be warmer, not colder... so... erm..

A bit odd

And I'm pretty sick of causes just using naked/half naked women to get their point across (I'm looking at YOU PETA)... so.... no upvote for me.

>> ^entr0py:
I don't understand is this video pro climate change or anti climate change?


This is the pro, the anti features corporate lobbyists stripping.

This was one vid that I was hoping to the the NSFW tag!

This could also be seen as a campaign ad to raise awareness of malnourished models.

I didn't think those models were so super.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
>> ^entr0py:
I don't understand is this video pro climate change or anti climate change?

This is the pro, the anti features corporate lobbyists stripping.


Actually, the anti involves corporate lobbyists hiring beautiful men and women who'll actually have sex with the legislators.

But I'm sure an ad like this will be just as effective.