Yeah...and the first time they announced that Paul was in the lead at double the votes of the runner up you could hear Hannity in the background groaning something like "Here we go again".

Fucknut spinmeisters...

Here's one to think about...For the last 28 years, there have been two families as Executive branch, fucker-uppers. Bushes and Clintons. Count the years that GB senior was in as VP with Reagan, (who, incidentally was forced to take Bush as a running mate) and that's 36 years,

My question to democrats and republicans is, "How in the fuck can you be so goddamn stupid??!!" There is no party system, just these empire-building, oliharch fucks, that need to be beat senseless on the capital steps. Their children should pay. My children will!!

"Fuck em all, fuck em' all, Fuck em up, and vote for Paul!!" -choggie's campaign slogan

You politics fuckers..yer gonna kill us all, will the very thing these "fucknuts" do for a living. Gather a buncha useless information, making a decision based upon contrived, meaningless issues, that will ensure these vile homo-sapien abortions another 30 years in office.......The business of fucking you and yours in the ass, as usual.

Democracy, ha! It's the same thing with Kucinich - he wins almost every poll they put out there, but all you hear about is Clinton and Obama. What a joke.

Have you cast your vote yet on these two major online voting polls?

http://www.whowouldtheworldelect.com/

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/

See who is in the lead

As much as I like the little elfin man, he has won zero polls that I know of. American isn't about ideas but about appearances.

elfin? Ron paul isn't elfin.

Hell, we elected a terminator cyborg, so is it too much to ask to elect frodo baggins?

Joedirt, if that were true then the Constitution would have never been written and many of our presidents wouldn't have been elected.

JoeDirt stated:"American isn't about ideas but about appearances."

Choggie, you realize it's worse than that, don't you? The Bush family is knee deep in past Presidents. Most notably with Barbara's connection to Franklin Pierce, who was considered one of the worst Presidents, but (from Wikipedia):

Current President George W. Bush is related to other presidents as well as Pierce, who he is also related to on his father's side via Daniel Brewer. He is also a cousin of Fillmore (via Millards), Lincoln (via Gilmans), Grant (via Lathrops), Hayes (via Smiths, Footes, Parmelees, and Huckinses), Garfield (via Wheelers, Carpenters, Cookes, Warrens, Holbrooks and le Botelers), Cleveland (via Smiths and Stanleys), Benjamin Harrison (via Hortons), Theodore Roosevelt (via Schuylers), Taft (via Holbrooks, Thayers, Haywards, Cookes, Footes, Ravenses, and Waterses), Coolidge (via Phillipses, Hortons, Garnseys, Pulsiphers, Ravenses, Richardsons, Moores, Bulkeleys, and Morses), Hoover (via Brookses, Reades, Wheelers, and Richardsons), Franklin Roosevelt (via Beekmans, Hutchinsons, Popes, Jenneys, Richardses, Palgraves, Lathrops, and Howlands), Nixon (via Lippincotts, Footes, Traverses, Morses, and Howlands), and Ford (via Vanderburghs, Wheelers, Marvins, Gilmans, and Howlands).

oh well.....guess we should have seen something coming....

I don't know, JoeDirt. I don't have the links, but I've seen Kucinich win at least a couple of polls and rank fairly high in a couple of others.

I'm suprised by who here supports Ole Paul. Some of these same sifters that like Obama or Hillary also like Paul, but socialist dogma is antipodal to what Paul represents, mostly ideals long abandoned by the American people.

FDR buried any chance for small government which was kept out of People's affairs by the restraints listed in the Constitution.

We now suffer under a bloated, quasi-tyrannical government until such time it collapses under its own weight.

You read a vote for the post as a vote for any candidate mentioned in it?

I wouldn't. I vote for what's interesting, more often it's the issues being discussed rather than the candidates involved. Personally I'd love to see a "none of the above" option which forced a new election with NONE of the names we've already heard from involved.

Paul is better than some options but hardly ideal for me, too isolationist for my tastes for one. I like that he talks about the drug war and Constitution though as well as conservative history. Don't forget it was former commander of allied forces in WWII and at the time current Republican President Eisenhower who coined the term "military/industrial complex", not some libs. We like to forget that these days though. To me when the so called conservatives decided everyone not in lockstep with current thinking was the enemy they sealed their own doom. Shut out too many who used to think they were one.

Until "none of the above" runs we'll have to go for people just talking about interesting subjects and see if we can at least find less damaging leaders than we've had in the past. Ideal isn't running.

Hannity and Colmbs pick sides the same way Oprah picks sides: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iNZQL_7FG_Uqt7WGnNnArn8Z1Iaw

Oprah is a talk show host and she's entitled to her opinions; just like Sean Hannity. He never claimed to be a reporter or host of a news show. He's open about the fact that he's host of a conservative program. Hannity doesn't hide his opinions about presidential candidates. So what?

The most surprising thing to me is they actually showed the results on the screen, rather then changing them when everyone started voting for the wrong candidate. But I love the irony of fox news immediately questioning their own polling methodology.