*quality

Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by kulpims.

Can't wait to see the difference this will make.

Obama will save us!

23, a number bustling with synchronicity! Is that goon next to him this Joe Biden tool I've been jeering so much about?

Two lawyers (from the Old English "lēogere" or liar) front-and-center serving-up a double-dose of "Hi, How do you do?!"

Liar sounds like lawyah, anyhow, insert your own etymology research there ,Linguistos'!

*controversy

Adding video to channels (Controversy) - requested by MrFisk.

"Like most Americans I believe the second amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms."

Damn Obama trying to take away our guns!

From my bias point of view the 2nd amendment is intended for all its people to be able to defend our self from the bad guys but more importantly from a government gone a muck.

As for what type of "gun" should be or should not be allow is based on what the government will use against its citizens.

Back int the beginning everyone had access to the same type of gun. The soldier used his own personal gun from home. If the government ran a muck then the playing field would level between Government and citizen.

Today guns are way more powerful.
If the government were to ban Gun x,y and x from civilian use then it should clearly be stated that the government should never be allowed to use it against its people also.

The government has broken its own law by using the Military on its people ( WACO). Can our government be trusted with gun bans? NOPE


To address the senseless killing:
Guns should not be banned, no not one. The bad guy does not care about the law and do what ever he wants.

You need to have a straight path to death row to the front of the line with a 90 day countdown. With no recourse if you commit a crime with a gun. Stick up, drive by, bank robbery, rape etc. DEATH to you.

Of course the legal system will have to have 100% proof.
For less than 100% proof 5 years out in 4 with good behavior.

This point of view will be meet by the left by saying I target the black and Latino communities. - Not true- I follow punishing the attacking gun user.



If on the other hand and you are defending by all means you your gun and be a free man. Again the legal system will have to have 100% proof.

Doesn't matter much taking anything a president says out of context when they're prone to lie continually regardless-Lawyers lie for a living as well, he's both.

He's can't nor wants to take away our guns, he's laying a foundation for future knee-jerk legislation, testing the waters of citizen's gullibility to the "it's all about our children" propaganda. kinna like maybe this guy??

"He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”

"By educating the young generation along the right lines, the People's State will have to see that a generation of mankind is formed which will be adequate to this supreme combat that will decide the destinies of the world."

Or this one, a tried and true method straight outta Mein Kamp:

" as long as the govt is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and any deprivation."

Not comparing Obummer to Hitler, just recognizing the methods of twisting emotions and minds with words...OH, and using fucking children as props!

Not all of us can just up and expatriate, baby-:O