Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
7 Comments
GenjiKilpatricksays...So.. what's the point of blurring the child's face if they named her mother like eight times and showed a mugshot..?
SpeveOsays...The guy doing the report sounds like Zapp Brannigan, and I gotta say, that 2 year old looks pretty adept with that spliff. I wonder how long "mommy" had been teaching her for.
MrFisksays...This wouldn't be a problem if cell phones were illegal.
jimnmssays...*wtf
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Wtf) - requested by jimnms.
ForgedRealitysays...Some people (and I use the term lightly) deserve to be shot in the face. Put them all out of our misery.
Tymbrwulfsays...>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
So.. what's the point of blurring the child's face if they named her mother like eight times and showed a mugshot..?
Anyone under the age of 18 is required by law to remain unidentified in video/audio/written word, etc. Any parent/relative over the age of 18 is not protected by that same law. That said, giving a baby marijuana is just wrong. Can't be any clearer than that.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.