Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
11 Comments
demon_ixOpposite marriage!

I can just feel the NOM spokesperson giving this an epic facepalm
ponceleonSo she starts out by saying it is great and then says it should be between a man and a woman... check out the brain on that chick...
Frankly though, it is kind of a strange question to ask at a BEAUTY PAGEANT. I mean, isn't the whole beauty pageant thing kinda 1950s? That's like going to a klan rally and asking about immigration. What kind of answer did you expect from someone who attends such an event?
stylemanBeing 1/2 of one of the 18,000 California gay married couples, I have to say she's entitled to her view. Even if I vehemently disagree.
But, for GOD's SAKE, please stop saying "no offense" when you say something offensive, "I love you" when you spew hateful rhetoric, or "It doesn't mean I'm homophobic" when that's exactly what it is.
NadaGeeksays...it's so nice she can just repeat someone else's slogan instead of thinking for herself
IrishmanShe is perfectly entitled to her fucking opinion.
vairetubeshe believes gay marriage should be between a man and a woman, like, you know?
ajkidoShe is entitled to make no sense.
alien_conceptI didn't hear many boos at all. Shameful cheering, meh
KevlarI personally believe that the U.S. Gays are unable to do so because, uh, some, people out there in our nation don't have maps to opposite marriage and, uh, I believe that our, uh, viewpoints like such as, uh, South Africa and, uh, no offense, the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and, I believe that they should, our education over here in the U.S. should help the U.S., uh, because that's just the way I was raised. So no offense.
gorillamanShe's not entitled to her opinion, she's entitled to the correct opinion.
Opinion is an expression of intent in the absence of influence. The possession of influence is circumstantial. Had she the influence, she'd act to enforce her intent. Action is accountability. If the realisation of her intent infringes on rights, she is culpable.
Frankly that's incidental, because anyone who tries to justify their position with, 'That's how I was raised,' ought to have their tongue cut out and lips sewn shut.
quantumushroomThis gay fascism is just as f--king stupid as the regular leftist leading brand.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.