Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
15 Comments
Boise_LibWell, I'm convinced.
EnzoblueAgain, why is the left media so angered by this? The vaccination is stretching the connection of HPV with cervical cancer with some seriously dubious numbers. 6 MILLION women get HPV and only 4000 die from the cancer??? The reason the vaccine is a topic, is because Governor Perry tried to force, BY LAW, all little girls in his state to get it because he was getting kick backs from Merck - the sole producer of this vaccine.
I'm all for vaccines, but this one smells of sleeze. It's curious why the media is taking such an "OMG anti-science" stance.
DerHasisttot>> ^Enzoblue:
Again, why is the left media so angered by this? The vaccination is stretching the connection of HPV with cervical cancer with some seriously dubious numbers. 6 MILLION women get HPV and only 4000 die from the cancer??? The reason the vaccine is a topic, is because Governor Perry tried to force, BY LAW, all little girls in his state to get it because he was getting kick backs from Merck - the sole producer of this vaccine.
I'm all for vaccines, but this one smells of sleeze. It's curious why the media is taking such an "OMG anti-science" stance.
The more people are vaccinated, the more likely it is that HPV is not transmitted to the women's children, the more likely it is that HPV is eradicated in the future: No more genital warts and hopefully, no more deaths. Compare smallpox.
Additionally, afaik and researched, there are no serious side-effects.
To be against the vaccine is demonstrably going against the science. Again: No significant negative, much positive.
marbles>> ^DerHasisttot:
The more people are vaccinated, the more likely it is that HPV is not transmitted to the women's children, the more likely it is that HPV is eradicated in the future: No more genital warts and hopefully, no more deaths. Compare smallpox.
Additionally, afaik and researched, there are no serious side-effects.
To be against the vaccine is demonstrably going against the science. Again: No significant negative, much positive.
To be "with the science", you sure are making a lot of unscientific claims. The vaccine industry is run on dogma, not science.
DerHasisttot>> ^marbles:
>> ^DerHasisttot:
The more people are vaccinated, the more likely it is that HPV is not transmitted to the women's children, the more likely it is that HPV is eradicated in the future: No more genital warts and hopefully, no more deaths. Compare smallpox.
Additionally, afaik and researched, there are no serious side-effects.
To be against the vaccine is demonstrably going against the science. Again: No significant negative, much positive.
To be "with the science", you sure are making a lot of unscientific claims. The vaccine industry is run on dogma, not science.
... You forgot to say that vaccines are used by the CIA to microchip everybody so they can be more easily abducted by the aliens. Keep on lining your home with tinfoil.
Tymbrwulf>> ^Enzoblue:
Again, why is the left media so angered by this? The vaccination is stretching the connection of HPV with cervical cancer with some seriously dubious numbers. 6 MILLION women get HPV and only 4000 die from the cancer??? The reason the vaccine is a topic, is because Governor Perry tried to force, BY LAW, all little girls in his state to get it because he was getting kick backs from Merck - the sole producer of this vaccine.
I'm all for vaccines, but this one smells of sleeze. It's curious why the media is taking such an "OMG anti-science" stance.
The HPV variants that are covered by this vaccine are well known risk factors for invasive cervical cancer and have been for over 10 years. It's more common in developing countries.
The only reason there is even a discussion about this is because the media are reporting on this negatively. You will not find a Doctor who disagrees with these studies.
Tymbrwulf*doublepromote for awareness
siftbotDouble-Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Sunday, September 18th, 2011 3:15am PDT - doublepromote requested by Tymbrwulf.
ant*health *science
siftbotAdding video to channels (Health, Science) - requested by ant.
jimnmsWhy is this in the parody channel?
spoco2@marbles: The vaccine industry is run on dogma, not science.
Seriously... you are off the fucking deep end. Go and look into the science of vaccines.
Or do you ignore science and instead try to ward off evil with homoeopathy?
marbles>> ^spoco2:
@marbles: The vaccine industry is run on dogma, not science.
Seriously... you are off the fucking deep end. Go and look into the science of vaccines.
Or do you ignore science and instead try to ward off evil with homoeopathy?
No, I just have faith in the government and big business.
spoco2@marbles
Excellent article by a doctor, who has a child with autism, on why this is all utter nonsense:
http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life/vaccination-a-victim-of-its-own-success-20110920-1kixy.html
But I'm sure you'll write this off using some conspiracy rubbish.
blankfistI think the point of this parody is to mock Bachmann's stance against Rick Perry's mandatory HPV vaccine of young girls in public schools, but it sure does come off as anti-immunizations. I'm against compulsory immunizations, too. That doesn't mean I'm anti-vaccination. I just don't think it should forced onto people, as there are a immensely small percentage that have fatal reactions to them. But fuck them right?
DDT used to be compulsory, too. Just sayin'.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.