Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
8 Comments
shuacsays...Same here, though I enjoy both.
Seven thoughts as I watched this vid:
1. Gangs of New York was such a nothing film. The Departed and Shutter Island were terrific.
2. Scorsese's early work (Who's That Knocking on My Door, Mean Streets, and Taxi Driver) was very artistic. His movies since that time: not so much.
3. "We Are the People is not the same as We Are the People. Let's not fight. Look, I'm gonna make it real simple. We don't pay for the buttons, We throw the buttons away."
4. The only Kubrick film I was really disappointed with was Eyes Wide Shut. That was also a nothing film.
5. Kubrick's movies are timeless and infinitely re-watchable. But then, so are Scorsese's.
6. Kubrick started as a photographer and so his films are meticulous and beautiful, especially Barry Lyndon. Kubrick was an artist through and through.
7. "Hey Dad. There's a strange fella sittin' on the sofa munchy-wunchin' long tics of toast!"
bleedmegoodsays...Kubrick, any day of the week.....also, 'eyes wide shut' and 'gangs of new york' both sucked.....in fact, I agreed with everything shuac had to say....especially #7....
andybesysays...Kubrick.
CheshireSmilesays...i liked gangs of new york! but maybe i'm just a DDL fan
Sarzysays...Not a tough choice at all. Scorsese is an amazing director, but Kubrick is a god. No one can frame a shot like Kubrick, move the camera like Kubrick, or match visuals to music like Kubrick (no, not even Scorsese). Plus, Scorsese's filmography is filled with classics, but it also has quite a few merely good films, and even a couple of duds.
Truckchasesays...Not sure who I'd pick ;-D -->
Croccydilesays...I have to defend Gangs of New York since to me that was hardly a nothing film. It had the quality of a period piece to where you felt like you were IN mid 19th century New York. Perhaps the movie was a bit longer than it needed to be but after re-watching it again recently I feel that it is up to the Scorsese standard. I do have difficulty remembering Eyes Wide Shut, and the only time I saw it was when it was originally in theaters.
Unfortunately I also lack the fortune of having seen either Goodfellas *or* Casino on the Scorsese side which makes for rather awkward conversations with the rest of the world who has. Same thing for Spartacus or Paths of Glory.
I did, however, watch Barry Lyndon for the first time just a few days ago. Now that is some damn fine cinematography. I know they used special f/0.9 lenses for the candlelight scenes, and it shows.
Upvote for the beautiful selection of music for the montage
Trancecoachsays...woopsy daisy
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.