How Hillary And The DNC Colluded To Steal The Election

A quick look at how the DNC and the Clinton campaign have skirted campaign donation limits by colluding since August 2015 to allow big donors to funnel more money into the Clinton campaign. In a clearly biased action, they made no such offer to Sanders...possibly knowing he would refuse to accept this underhanded, law skirting type of financing.
This 'deal' allows one couple to give over $1,300,000 indirectly to Hillary's campaign, completely ignoring the $10000 donation cap.
This scheme is also how Clinton managed to buy so many super delegates before the campaign even started, by using these funds, and why Sanders isn't getting ANY super delegates even from states where he crushed her >82% to <17%...he won't buy them.
Don't let them buy this election.
newtboysays...

Sweet Zombie Jesus, this is just getting INSANE.
I just saw the DNC head on TV just yesterday claiming she (and the DNC) was still completely impartial, neutral, and had absolutely no stake in either candidate. I wonder what she would have said about this story.

It's pretty clear that there's something ridiculously fishy going on, with so many super delegates going to Clinton before a single primary vote was cast (469 today), and still so few going to Sanders (31 today), who's only behind by 10% at worst (45% of delegates to Clinton's 55%) with almost 1/2 of the delegates still up for grabs in states that almost all favor Sanders in non-midday-land line only polls.
It's almost like something made up their minds for them besides the will of the people....hmmmmmm....what might that have been?

Mordhaussays...

I guess Hils is a proponent of the "if you ain't cheating, you ain't trying" school. The ridiculous amount of effort to make Sanders disappear has been shocking, hardly any airtime, primary rigging attempts, and super delegates that are probably counting stacks of cash if they vote for Clinton.

I suspect we are going to end up in another situation where the candidate that wins didn't actually win the popular vote.

siftbotsays...

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Wednesday, April 6th, 2016 12:50pm PDT - promote requested by Mordhaus.

MilkmanDansays...

Both parties clearly pine for the old days where the party bigwigs gathered in a smoke-filled room and decided who the nominee was going to be.

Sometimes it seems like that system resulted in higher-quality candidates. Or at least candidates who were better able to hide their sleazy politician auras behind a screen of charisma.

But shit like this makes it very clear how and why that system was shady and corrupt.

Unfortunately, I don't think this story will be big enough news to change anything. The likelihood of the GOP going to a contested convention and foisting some candidate on voters that hasn't even been running (Drudge Report suggests Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan are likely choices of the party) is much more likely to cause a big enough splash to change things.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More