Hillary Clinton on the nuclear deterrence of Iran

Hillary Clinton at Democratic debate April 16, 2008, MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann April 21, 2008 and ABC's Good Morning America, April 22, 2008.
source: milkandcookies.com
kronosposeidonsays...

God, I'm so sick of this hawkish dingleberry. Anything Bill Clinton did that was good when he was the bossman (and he did a few good things, IMHO) has been completely negated by her whole campaign. If we have a Republican president after 1/20/09, it will be ALL her fault.

RedSkysays...

The irony of this is she's flouting her brinkmanship in the face of brinkmanship, more or less because it's a political strategic move to bring in Republican votes.

If Iran does indeed end up acquiring nuclear weapons they will never be used against a separate sovereign state, and frankly neither would Hilary ever resort to such measures either. Instead they will be used as leverage against Israel and unfriendly nearby Arab countries to satisfying Iran's needs. In fact this is almost word for word what was uncovered of Saddam's motives in his interrogation, although he had abandoned research a considerable time before the US invaded, that had indeed been his intention when he did attempt to acquire them and it was the reason he vehemently opposed UN inspectors so as to create the visage of military clout.

choggiesays...

no shit, Clitless, an attack on Israel would provoke a retaliation from the U.S,
Something, uh...new, ya vapid cretin!!!!????

I like how she says, "those people that run Iran....
that could means teh U.S., dat whackyman hamdinnajob-allcheesebugrs, or Mary Fucking Poppers!!!

(ceiling cat knows the end of the parradiggiums, why dontz the kitties????)

Vote for this bitch you, American kitties, annn seeees what happens faster than Oldbammers or Skeletor-

my15minutessays...

allow me to translate, from the original choggish:

madam senator:
i find your sabre-rattling to be disingenuous, and transparently aimed at bolstering your 'diplomatic' credentials, while in fact revealing your lack thereof.

you know perfectly well that iran is currently a theocratic republic, and who currently serves as its heads of state, and of government. being coy with such matters does little to endear you to a public already suspicious of your motives, for attaining our nation's highest office, at a troubled time.

which is why i will refrain from the familiar sophomoric jeers, regarding his name,
as it is surprisingly easy to pronounce: omma dinna jod

however, if i may end with a personal observation?
i am concerned with the quality of your sex life, madam senator.

and with all due sincerity, this has recently driven me to despair...
lying awake, at night... despairing, for you...

choggiesays...

she knows something...or somebody-what does "Candidate of Hope" mean contextually stated fed??...cause if you mean, "I hope this one can do something righteous", then I guess I hope the same also if he's the,*people's choice* for glorious leader, too.....I will, "surrender my will, as of this date!"

jwraysays...

Iran's government has already stated they *want to* exterminate Israel

If they actually try to do it, what should we do about that? Try to talk some sense into Ahmadinejad? Beg for mercy? Shoot down the missiles in midair with starwars? And what if none of those work? Sit back and do nothing?

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More