Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
4 Comments
spawnflaggersays...impressive, but not surprising that it can be done in realtime.
basically the same tech that is used for AR/VR, just has to sense+record the movement of the camera precisely.
SFOGuysays...I guess I should have been able to draw that conclusion, eh?
But---I hadn't drawn the direct line between the two techs.
Or maybe, it's more one tech?
impressive, but not surprising that it can be done in realtime.
basically the same tech that is used for AR/VR, just has to sense+record the movement of the camera precisely.
GregTSLsays...This is basically how James Cameron shot Avatar. The backgrounds weren't fully rendered, but had enough detail he could get a feel for the final result. Also the actors would be represented in realtime in his field of view as their 12 foot tall counterparts...pretty amazing.
ChaosEnginesays...Yeah, the important thing here is the actor is not interacting with any of the scene. Sure, he sits on a couch, but if you were to look closely, you'd probably see the couch wasn't deforming normally.
Basically, this is just a static scene with a few simple shadows, and computers are very good at that these days.
Walking through a forest and brushing leaves out of the way? That's another story.
impressive, but not surprising that it can be done in realtime.
basically the same tech that is used for AR/VR, just has to sense+record the movement of the camera precisely.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.