and it'll allow for easy, instantaneous adoption of a Dvorak keyboard layout:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard

...and then back to 'normal'. which i'm surprised they didn't even touch on.

Cool, but, my keyboard doesn't require 120 volts AC converted to 7.5v DC just to show me which button I'm pressing. Also, the only people who switch between Mac and PC are clinically insane.

[redacted]

The reason to have a keyboard, as opposed to say a stylus, or a bunch of letter click boxes is so that you can enter text without looking at the keys, and therefor do it quickly.

Please somebody give me one(1) situation in which this could be argued to be even remotely useful.

Note my keyboard says [qwerty] but types [',.pyf] the letters printed on the keys matter not at all.

useless novelty tech.

I read this keyboard has slow responses when typing. I will stick with my clicky PS/2 PC104 keyboards.

"Typing on it, well, sucks. We kind of hate to say it, but this thing more than likely won't replace what ever keyboard you're writing your novel on -- it's better off used as an absurdly configurable swiss army knife for tasks like gaming, Photoshop, or just about any other productivity app that doesn't require a lot of typing."

I can't see any reason why anyone would use this keyboard. I mean, it's really cool and all, but the practical value is pretty low. I would not want to game on something like this, it fails at typing, and I don't see why you'd use this for photoshopping. When I'm 'shopping, I just use the normal keyboard shortcuts, don't see any reason to force me to look at my keyboard every time I want to do something else.

Speaking of which, I almost never look at my keyboard as it is, and I don't want to. Why would forcing me to look at my keyboard be a good idea?