David Suzuki: What is the economy for?!

David Suzuki, at the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, sounding much more emotionally forceful that usual, gives a 42 minute speech on how the global economy fails to serve the natural environment which is seen as an external cost ignored by the market. Citing examples of the dying oceans, the human body burden, and deforestation, Suzuki describes his fears for the next generation in a world whose economic system rewards the squandering of future natural resources in order to satiate the present need for growth.
GeeSussFreeKsays...

It seems a valid solution could still be had with free market and liberty. A reinterpretation of property rights could be in order and liability for actions that disturb the health of persons. I don't believe in positive rights mind you. Like I don't think you have a right to fresh air, however, you do have a right form someone to pollute the air your breath in a way that might give you cancer. Enforcing these types of things would be a step for health and environment of all while maintaining a government of liberty's and freedom's.

It is the more abstract problems that will be harder to solve with laws and such. Hunting an animal to extinction doesn't necessarily hurt anyone directly. And I don't think you have a right to have some other animal exist for the sake of existing. So how do you deal with that? How do you setup a consistent system of liberty while also trying to maintain the planet in whatever small way we can?

I do think the answer lays more in education and personal responsibility than of legislation. There are plenty of things that are illegal that people still do, and in no small number either. Some corporations buck certain laws because they can afford the fines (in other words its more profitable to break the law than follow it). But, if we took it upon a public responsibility, not of law but of culture, I would wager you could effect change more rapidly and more effectively than any law could hope to do.

In other words, I think free markets and liberty have the best chance to solve the problem instead of the other way around. Consumers just have to put their money where their mouth is. If you don't like a company because of their environmental policies, then don't shop there. That will speak louder than any regulation.

Speaking of regulations, I am sure that large stores could afford better lobbies than you or I. What more, they could use what you intend for good for evil. Trying to push laws that aren't fair and only hurt their competitors pocket books. The move for legislation and regulation almost always ends up in this situation.

But movements of culture and the all mighty dollar speak loud, and decisively clear. If you, the company, do not meet the needs and wants of the consumer, then you will go out of business, period. The results resonate in the industry and business's would shape up, or ship out.

Practically speaking. If advocacy groups would target one company, the worst or easiest defender to shut down, and boycott (yall remember that word till the point they changed or went under, they would have much better results than trying to change all industries at the same time. It is much better to try and cut down one tree at a time than a whole forest (ouch, might be a bad analogy now that I think of it).

rougysays...

Any time somebody calls you a "tree hugger" take it as a compliment.

A mark of honor.

Dr. Suzuki made another excellent point: if the capitalist market is to be a success, it must be in a state of constant growth; the day it stops growing, it starts dying.

Nobody has yet figured out a way around that fatal flaw.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More