Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
10 Comments
sholemy first instinct is to laugh but it can't climb over my loss of faith in humanity and willingness to kill myself![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/smile.gif)
also, those are piss-poor examples, as most are superstitious and non-scientific
love the cherrypicking at the end with the global flooding theory
gwiz665HOVIIND!!!!!! *shakes fist*
A10anisWhat they've unwittingly done is show why science is superior to religious dogma. Ofcourse there are many scientific "truths" that, in time, will be qualified or disgarded, it's called learning. The difference between science and religion is that scientists question and look for the correct answer. They keep questioning until a truth- like the earth being a globe or the earth orbiting the sun- is arrived at. At any time their "truth" is also open to question. Were it not, we would still believe the earth was flat and the sun orbited us. The religious, on the other hand, question nothing and simply accept with blind faith. "Faith means never wanting to know what is true" Friedrich Nietzsche.
gwiz665*lies *fail
siftbotAdding video to channels (Fail, Lies) - requested by gwiz665.
enochhovind?
as in "ken hovind" progeny?
the same ken hovind who lied about his science credentials and was incarcerated for fraud?
THAT hovind?
looks like ken hovind has taken his charlatan show family style.
douchebags.
vaporlockCreationists poking holes in the most cherished beliefs of the 19th century.
The Creationist... Modern, by 19th century standards.
Myslingsays...I might not remember this correctly, but aren't many of these examples exactly the reason falsificationism was introduced within the scientific community, requiring all theories to be testable and consequently discarded if the results did not correspond to the theory?
![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/smile.gif)
Quire ironic, given that creationism is largely considered a non-science since it cannot be tested, and therefore is not falsifiable.
However, it has been quite some years since i last took a class in scientific theory, so please correct me if I'm wrong
ReverendTed*length=3:45
siftbotThe duration of this video has been updated from unknown to 3:45 - length declared by ReverendTed.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.