Video Flagged Dead
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
13 Comments
shuacsays...Before Chris Matthews is able to own anyone on this topic, he should first learn what evolution actually is. If he knew that, he'd be able to tell this fellow that a) evolution contains no declaration about the creation of life and b) evolution does not claim that any one species turns into another.
kronosposeidonsays...I upvoted this because of the political debate, but I agree that we need a better representative to debate the lack of scientific merits to "intelligent design." Tancredo spouted so many false claims that Matthews could have challenged, but he probably didn't even know they were falsehoods. I'm no biologist, but even I could have called out Tancredo on half his bullshit.
siftbotsays...This post has been removed from the Eco channel by channel owner fissionchips. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.
longdesays...Not a good exchange because neither person understands evolution or intelligent design. It's like watching two blind men fumbling about.
jiyanibisays...Yeah, I wouldn't exactly call this "owning", unless "owning" means giggling like a couple of little Catholic schoolboys. I like Matthews, but both of these guys are clueless about both evolution and ID. To say that ID'ers are "well respected", or that there's "nothing to argue about" between ID or evolution, or that ID "should be taught in school", is all kinds of nonsense.
If you wanna know more about each exact point of bullshit spewed forth in this video, this article pretty much sums up what I might've said... http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/05/the_matthewstancredo_mutual_ig.php
Mashikisays...That entire clip was terrible, and should be nuked from orbit.
BreaksTheEarthsays...^ You're all correct Matthews couldn't 'own' a paper bag, but 'fumble a challenge' was too big for the title.
ElJardinerosays...No debate. No owning.
Even when he talks about no evidence for 'transitional fossils' Matthews's answer is "Right".
NO MATTHEWS, THAT'S FUCKING WRONG.
chtiernasays...These arguments are so tired and disproved everywhere. There is no big controversy amongst the scientists community, the two theories are not equal just because a lot of ignorant people want one to be true.
longdesays...*dead
siftbotsays...This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by longde.
ctrlaltbleachsays...*dead
siftbotsays...This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by ctrlaltbleach.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.