Post has been Discarded
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
13 Comments
therealblankmanI'm gonna' skip a step here and *blog this myself. This is a very explicit depiction of sexuality, but is certainly NOT porn. I found it fascinating, and I hope others agree. I do ask all of my fellow goldies to refrain from discarding this until such time as a consensus has been arrived at.
The question is: is this suitable for the 'sift? I think so.
siftbotSending this video to Sift Talk for discussion (sent by gold star member therealblankman)
mlxbrb
mlxOk.
Now, the showing of the actual sex act does indeed fall into the 'harmful to minors' category, [Children's Internet Protection Act], even if it is educational or for research.
In my opinion items such as this may place Videsift on watch by certain filtering services like SmartFilter or CyberPatrol which will greatly decrease our availability on the Net. If tagged as 'harmful to minors', VS won't be allowed on any public computer which recieves U.S. Federal funding such as those in libraries and schools. Public entities which provide free Internet access in parks or other municipal areas could also block VS.
Now, I'm all for Freedom of Access, but everyone needs to understand the repercussions of moving into this type of content.
joedirtThis is more graphic than soft-core porn. So yeah, maybe BBC put it out, but ... are you nutz?!
So while sciencey shows are nice, I think you'll have to do without this one. I worry even this is sitting in the blog where NSFW geets removed until it is sent back.
Really, this shouldn't be around.
choggie....it's that goddamn frog newscaster, has all these hard-ups in a tither....go out and getcha some, ya wankeroonies, use dem natural lubrication, mon......
whoa, what if instead of Trojans, hot bitches with Duff beer woulda jumped out on them Troys????
...nice try though, Kinsey, try www.labiacoccoon.com
for comfort.......
benjeeWow: I'm amazed this came from the BBC (missed it when aired...must have been a late-night show!). How uncomfortable must that sex have been? Cameras strapped/inserted everywhere and a film crew stood around with high-power lights!
I'm a very open-minded Sifter; but this pushed the limit even for me (I don't recommend watching while trying to eat lunch! Put me right off...)
WumpusI'll have to agree that erring on the side of caution is the due course of action here. It is legitimate in its own right, but allowing this kind explicit, albeit educational material will start a slipping of standards. While submitters will always find a way to push the limits, we need to maintain a clear definition of what is, and what isn't acceptable.
darksunAhar, you all seem amazed this was shown on the BBC. Thats because it wasn't. It's part of a program on Channel 4 called a "Girls Guide To 21st Century Sex".
Just thought you'd like to know...
dagComment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
For all of the reasons above, I don't think we can put this on the front page. It was very interesting though. Kind of takes the magic out of things a bit. *discard.
siftbotDiscarding this post (discard called by gold star member dag)
benjeeAhh - that's why I thought it was strange. Must be a recent upload - the show's being broadcast at the moment.
rickegeeGood *discard. Not unlike the movie Microcosmos, though.
I am not sure that I learned anything other than that you can put a camera anywhere. And that there will always be actors/models willing to be on television. I would really love to see the contract that the actors and the fluffers signed for this piece of Mr. Wizard porn.
That is one helluva way to get a SAG card.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.