9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB !!!

lol , I belive , 911 was a total goverment fuck up ( with some people maby evan knowing what was going to happen and choosing to say nothing) .

as for the buildings falling down I think supper large buldings are pre rigged to be able to be demolished in a way that makes them fall right down. if u think about it would u rather have world trade center fall side ways killing 5-20k people or right down killing 2-6k people ? (lol maby not but still fun idea to entertain)

no way to realy know for sure what happend on 911 , what important is to look at what is taking place right now and what needs to be stoped / priortized .

Its max lol how 911 had totaly negligable inpact on actual safty or loss of life to people in USA and western world but as a result the actions the goverments have taken have resulted in over 400k Dead

>> ^westy:

as for the buildings falling down I think supper large buldings are pre rigged to be able to be demolished in a way that makes them fall right down.If this is true, then it explains how the twin towers fell too. It would also explain that guy's "pull it." comment. <scratches chin> If only we had a way to see if this claim was true.

What I think Westy meant was that tall buildings are designed so that they would collapse on their own foot print.

And no, "pull it" would be "pull the operation, get the men out"

Wow! 1300 engineers and architects think there's something fishy about WTC7's collapse. Why that's almost one twentieth of 1% of all the Engineers and architects in the USA. Wow!

Moving this video to Duckman33's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

"Still think truthers are crazy? 9/11 victims family members don't. This is what we've been talking about all along...."

No I don't think they're crazy, what I think is that the Truthers have not provided verifiable or demonstrable evidence to back up their claims. Of those 1300 engineers and architects how many have done an experiment or produced a model or even theoretically tested a hypothesis about Building 7s collapse. It's not that we're just saying "Shut up and believe the government" it's that we're being like Dr. Neil Tyson...we need more than just "I SAW IT!"

Give us something we can test in a lab...bring your findings to a reputable engineering or architectural journal. Give us some evidence we can test and verify...don't just repeat the same shit over and over and over. You sound like you're advocating "Intelligent Design".

>> ^MarineGunrock:


And no, "pull it" would be "pull the operation, get the men out"


What a complete and utter sheep you are...cowing to the official story like that...you might as well eat some hay ya dumb horse!

When he said "pull it" he was obviously talking about his Cock.

Amazing. Islamic Terrorists orchestrate the worst attack on American soil in history, and the American people are up in arms against our government over it? Our government has things it needs to be held accountable for, but this is not one of them. The deficit, ongoing struggle in the middle east and economy are all topics worthy of government accountability. This is a waste of time.

>> ^MarineGunrock:

What I think Westy meant was that tall buildings are designed so that they would collapse on their own foot print.
And no, "pull it" would be "pull the operation, get the men out"


On the day itself, I remember folks on the news saying that the buildings had indeed been designed to fall into their own footprints.

I mean, I guess you have to *entertain* the idea of a collapse when you build any building. Especially when your building is big enough to fall across a few city blocks.

>> ^CaBhaal:

Amazing. Islamic Terrorists orchestrate the worst attack on American soil in history, and the American people are up in arms against our government over it? Our government has things it needs to be held accountable for, but this is not one of them. The deficit, ongoing struggle in the middle east and economy are all topics worthy of government accountability. This is a waste of time.


Well that depends. For instance I blame our government for being terrorists around the world against the American peoples wishes and inciting rage against America by the victims of our terror.

What other buildings have been "pre-rigged" to collapse upon their footprint at the result of a fire, or an adjacent collapse.

if you or anyone can name one other example in which this is the case, I'll buy it.

anyone?


anyone?

<crickets>

>> ^westy:
as for the buildings falling down I think supper large buldings are pre rigged to be able to be demolished in a way that makes them fall right down. if u think about it would u rather have world trade center fall side ways killing 5-20k people or right down killing 2-6k people ? (lol maby not but still fun idea to entertain)

You watch too much CNN. I'm in the US military and your statement does not wash. Personal experience beats the fantasy you watch on TV.

>>
Well that depends. For instance I blame our government for being terrorists around the world against the American peoples wishes and inciting rage against America by the victims of our terror.

I enjoyed reading this web site from beginning to end. It pretty well debunks most of the Building 7 conspiracy theory claims.

I was reading an interesting article about "ghost-hunting" earlier today and I'm amazed at the similarities between ghost hunters and "truthers." Ghost hunters explanations for everything from a cold spot in the house to an electromagnetic disturbance to a ghost hunter getting a mild headache are "ghosts did it"--without any corroborating evidence what-so-ever. Their claim is: if a ghost didn't do it, then what else could it be?

The Building 7 debacle seems to be the same thing to me. The claim always seems to be: if not a conspiracy, then what? It's the lack of any evidence that they claim gives credence to their assertions. Because they don't know why something happened, it must have been a conspiracy.