>> ^deathcow:

She's old enough to be his Mom...


I'd find it quite disturbing if his mom was only 7 years older than him.

Your video, Porn Rental (with Michael C. Hall and Ben Schwartz), has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 34 Badge!

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

This. http://videosift.com/video/Porn-stardom-do-s-don-t-s-very-explicit-and-hilarious?loadcomm=1#comment-1125831

>> ^KnivesOut:
Without it, Videosift would just turn into Porn-Bumper, there would be non-stop porn getting sifted.


If the sift were like pornbumper no one would have posted a video in six months (wtf guys?)

I thought the no porn rule was more about appeasing the advertisers, in which case any redeeming features may not signify.

> ^gwiz665:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/spoco2" title="member since August 21st, 2006" class="profilelink">spoco2 Stop in the name of american squeamishness. This skates the edges, certainly, I expected that the explicit blowjob part would be its doom, but I think this is siftable. If there wasn't an executive order not to sift porn and if people weren't so overly diligent in interpreting that, it would have sifted fine too.


Don't even try to make this be about people being 'prudes'. There are places for that sort of thing, and the sift is NOT one of them, it's not us being prudish about the content, it's about us not wanting it on THIS SITE. One of the things about this place is that it's pretty much work safe, even the NSFW stuff is fine for most workplaces. THAT was nowhere NEAR being safe for any work place, and it is, whether you like it or not, hard core porn. As soon as there is a dick in a mouth or other orifice it is porn.

We all know you like your porn gwiz, and that's fine, hell, I have no issue with it myself, but get your porn fix elsewhere and keep it away from here. Why must you keep trying to bring it here? *sigh* Are you on some crusade to make the sift a pornocopia? Just leave it be.

Disagree. That clip is not nearly as graphic and has 10x the production value. There is no "pussy in mouth" because you don't see any of the bits. There aren't even nipples (to my disappointment.)

So would a snuff film be allowable if it had a happy ending? Or if there was some comedy in the process of murdering the hobo? No, it's disqualified by the presence of this objectionable content, not qualified by the presence of something redeeming.
>> ^gwiz665:

...
Does that belong? Pussy in mouth isn't much "better".

>> ^Hybrid:

If I put forward gwiz to be banned do I get me a ban badge???


why ban gwiz, just send him to Sweden

>> ^Hybrid:

If I put forward gwiz to be banned do I get me a ban badge???


That will take you straight to a level 3 Ban Police badge.

Not sure, I just thought it was funny.
>> ^Stingray:

Funny video, but is it going to pass the dag wood test?

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Congratulations! Your video, Porn star saves guy from potentially 20 yrs in prison, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.

This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 1 Badge!

>> ^BoneRemake:

adult film workers are just as good as the girl who serves you coffee, sans the tits in the face.


Except that girl would never be all butt hurt if someone else served you the coffee she made.

Like fjules say, it's copying. They're not losing money, they're gaining free advertising and loyal horny 14 year old customers. (not everyone is "piracy" savvy)

Considering that the majority of pornstars are most likey single female swingers who are estranged from large parts of their family.. (who make THOUSANDS per scene)
..it just seems a bit disingenuous to whine about what is effectively - some guy letting his friend borrow a porn flick.

Imagine how large their industry would be now if everyone had been required to own an origin VHS and lending it to a friend had resulted in jail or a lawsuit.

Imagine how famous the other 96% of fledging pornstars would be if it was a punishable offense to show their faces on a website that wasn't owned by the studio they worked for.

(pssst. the answer to both is.. "not very")

In sum:

It's copying/borrowing. They make $5000 per days work. ..It's sex. (i.e. not difficult. valueless)