>> ^entr0py:

But it is a dilemma when you think about it. If you are going to have laws against the possession of child pornography, you almost have to rely on "expert" guesses at age. Since the vast majority of kids appearing in actual CP could never be tracked down.

Still though if someone could track her down as easily as just looking up her Myspace page then I suspect they didn't try very hard to find her for verification. I'm not sure how the system works now but I think there should be consequences if the prosecutor doesn't make sure they've got all the facts straight, especially if they had actually managed to get a conviction. More than likely though they probably didn't give a damn whether he was really guilty or not and just wanted the conviction.

>> ^Throbbin:

Is there anything pornstars can't do?


act

After hearing her speak I'd like to punt her a good 50 yards or so.
>> ^Yogi:

Jesus she's 4'9" and 88 pounds...you could like play football with her.

THAT WASN'T HIS KNEE!!>> ^Deano:

He had to put her on his knee didn't he?

Your video, Porn star saves guy from potentially 20 yrs in prison, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

first and last time a pornstar will save someone from prison.


I downvoted your comment because for the next hour and 24 minutes, I have been paid to have a positive outlook on life.

I thought You might like this video based on one of your last sifts. cheers!
http://www.videosift.com/video/Porn-for-Bibles

>> ^silvercord:
>> ^burdturgler:
Exploitation is an unfortunate reality connected with many many things, pornography included. But this debate isn't about whether or not pornography is acceptable on this site. Porn isn't allowed. That's already been said from the beginning. It's also not about whether pornography is addictive or whether it's immoral or to what degree I need to confess after whacking off. This discussion is about defining guidelines here regarding posting videos. Porn never has and will never be a part of Videosift. But what is porn? It seems to me the advertisers are the ones that in the end will decide this, because regardless of what reasonable wording (sudsy tits in the shower but no erect nipples?) we apply there will always be videos that violate it. So what are we doing? Trying to define our community knowing that it isn't in our control?

My point is that you don't need an external rule if you have internal control. Do you really want someone telling you what you can post or not? Or would you rather be able to decide that for yourself based on your concern for others? Why let advertisers control that when we can do it ourselves without a written code?


Unfortunately the advertisers hold more power then we do. Until videosift can make a better revenue then it is on subscriptions, the advertisers pay to keep it running. If they don't like what they're funding, they pull the funding, and the sift is lost.

Determining what we can post is still important, but if the sponsors don't like it, then it has to go.

>> ^burdturgler:
Exploitation is an unfortunate reality connected with many many things, pornography included. But this debate isn't about whether or not pornography is acceptable on this site. Porn isn't allowed. That's already been said from the beginning. It's also not about whether pornography is addictive or whether it's immoral or to what degree I need to confess after whacking off. This discussion is about defining guidelines here regarding posting videos. Porn never has and will never be a part of Videosift. But what is porn? It seems to me the advertisers are the ones that in the end will decide this, because regardless of what reasonable wording (sudsy tits in the shower but no erect nipples?) we apply there will always be videos that violate it. So what are we doing? Trying to define our community knowing that it isn't in our control?


My point is that you don't need an external rule if you have internal control. Do you really want someone telling you what you can post or not? Or would you rather be able to decide that for yourself based on your concern for others? Why let advertisers control that when we can do it ourselves without a written code?

Exploitation is an unfortunate reality connected with many many things, pornography included. But this debate isn't about whether or not pornography is acceptable on this site. Porn isn't allowed. That's already been said from the beginning. It's also not about whether pornography is addictive or whether it's immoral or to what degree I need to confess after whacking off. This discussion is about defining guidelines here regarding posting videos. Porn never has and will never be a part of Videosift. But what is porn? It seems to me the advertisers are the ones that in the end will decide this, because regardless of what reasonable wording (sudsy tits in the shower but no erect nipples?) we apply there will always be videos that violate it. So what are we doing? Trying to define our community knowing that it isn't in our control?

>> ^BreaksTheEarth:
So where do we go from here? An eternal discussion?
Oh and choggie simply because you label the video porn does not make it so.


Then what does. What describes "Porn" in your opinion?

Dictionary.com has it listed as:

por·nog·ra·phy (pôr-nŏg'rə-fē)
n.

1.Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.
2. The presentation or production of this material.
3. Lurid or sensational material: "Recent novels about the Holocaust have kept Hitler well offstage [so as] to avoid the ... pornography of the era" (Morris Dickstein).

Like it or not, The video is all about producing sexual arousal. Maybe not for the viewers, but the entire video is about those women in some form of class, or group or something, getting aroused, and then stimulating themselves.

So where do we go from here? An eternal discussion?

Oh and choggie simply because you label the video porn does not make it so.

Yeah I know. I just thought the comment looked better with just the link without any explanations that this isn't exactly dick in dick.

However I've seen a video of a vibrator being pushed inside the peehole of a penis. But due to trauma don't want to search it ever again. Not that I was searching for it the first time...

>> ^mxxcon:
>> ^ajkido:
http://images.google.com/images?q=cock+docking
that's not the same as what the song is about.
not in the foreskin, but in the peehole.
comeback when you find the genuine one

>> ^ajkido:
http://images.google.com/images?q=cock+docking
that's not the same as what the song is about.
not in the foreskin, but in the peehole.
comeback when you find the genuine one

>> ^mrsid:
Swiss, not German...


How can ya tell?