dude. You know, if this was a man in a trenchcoat just whipping it out, it'd be different.


Notice she never complains about anything that the person did or didn't do, she's just complaining that the person exists. And so are you.



Oops I forgot
*doublepromote

Democracy is ALWAYS the lesser of two evils. No candidate (even St Bernie) is perfect .

Look at France. They've just elected Emmanuel Macron. Nobody has much a clue who this guy was yet he won nearly 2/3 of the vote. Why? Because the other option was Marine Le fucking Pen, someone who makes Trump look inclusive. Although at least she could string a sentence together, even if it was generally openly evil.

The point is that given the choice between mediocrity and evil, you be a grown up about it and choose mediocrity. Yeah, it sucks, but life sucks sometimes... deal with it. If you decide to "let the system burn", then you and your matrix trenchcoat that you thought was cool in 99 deserve everything you get.

See, the important Clinton here is Hillary. Despite your hope and your ignorant conflations, Bill is not running for the presidency. Hillary Clinton is just as moral as Reagan and Romney. (Period, but also specifically with respect to sexual indiscretions. She has been faithful. Don't take that away from her just because she's a woman.)

And with respect to the rape allegations, it's disingenuous to presume they're true. Bill Clinton was accused of rape, yes. But no charges were brought against him. Indeed, one of the women who accused him signed an affidavit saying that she was lying about the accusation and then later (now) wants to rescind her affidavit. Until there are charges it's just more bullshit to slander the Clintons.

(Trump, on the other hand, is actually facing charges soon regarding the rape of an underage girl.)

And if you think that a woman standing by her man when he's accused of rape isn't a beautiful thing, well, I would question your humanity. If Hillary hadn't stood by Bill it would have reflected poorly on him. That she did tips the scales in the other direction. Also, it reflects well upon her. (I am sure Melania will stand by Trump during his trial and that will speak well to both of them.)

Again, it comes down to allegations vs. facts. Your whole characterization of the Clintons is based on allegations. The right's characterization of the Clintons is based on allegations. All of the characterizations come down to histrionic allegations. The things that are facts that they've done wrong they've apologized for. Hillary apologized for using a personal e-mail server, despite the fact that it was common practice for people to use personal e-mail servers in the 2000's. Hillary has apologized for the mistake at Benghazi, despite the fact that many similar attacks happened under Bush/Cheney's watch. The allegations of 'voter fraud' in the Democratic primary are bad, but even Hillary's opposition sided with her in the end.

And there's really nothing else propping up the perception that Hillary is bad in any way other than these allegations. It's just a matter of the right's echo chamber (including you) repeating it over and over again, which anybody can see is totally devoid of substantive reason. People 'feel' like Hillary is bad, but there's nothing there to show it.

It is because there is indeed, nothing there.

But with respect to Trump he has shown time and time again that he is unfit for any office, that he will take personal advantage of any power given to him. He continues to act in a way antithetical to the position he seeks. They say that you should dress for the position you seek. If the position of the Presidency requires one to wear a button down shirt and nice slacks Trump is a drunk, dirty, smelly bum wearing a trenchcoat, running down the street with no self control, yelling about how great Putin and Kim Jong Il are, grabbing whatever pussy he can find.

This admission of sexual assault is just the final nail in the coffin for him. (Or perhaps just the latest final nail.) To speak of sexual assault as anything other than the dictionary definition of being unfit to be president is just wrong.

My impression is the anchor got that bit of info from her earpeace, and at the end of the video they credited the dude behind the scenes that noticed it. Steve Meister isn't the name of the helecopter reporter, it's some laywer dude they had in the studio, that's why she's joking about him representing Mr. Trenchcoat.

>> ^hpqp:

ChaosEngine | Free Trenchcoats 2016!!!


I humbly accept your nomination. Shame neither of us live in the US, otherwise you could've been my running mate

>> ^ChaosEngine:

I have the solution to the US's gun problems: ban guns.
BUT BUT BUT the 2nd amendment! Ah, but the second amendment say people are allowed to keep their arms. No-one is proposing mass amputations (as if the health system could manage it!).
Oh, that's not what "arms" means?
Fine, solution 2.0: still banning guns but everyone gets a sword.
Seriously, this is not as crazy as it sounds.
1. It's hard to use a sword well. People will have to train with it for years. This kind of training builds character and discipline.
2. Swords are awesome.
3. It's possible to defend yourself using a sword, but pretty hard to hold up a bank with one.
4. Gun fights are boring, sword fights are epic.


ChaosEngine | Free Trenchcoats 2016!!!

Glass is equal opportunity. How do you think I feel with all these broads on the stairs, spying while I churn butter in a trenchcoat?

I'm a fucking saint. "Saint That-guy-in-the-bushes-with-a-trenchcoat-and-huge-glasses" aka Saint Valentine. I even have a day, where people go around raping each other. Sure, they butter each other up with candy and hearts and all that junk, but that's only until they can get their prey to their rapist vans.. or so I've been told.

I mean, he seemed like such a nice guy with candy and stuff...

In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
1) Great detective work
2) That's fucking crazy. You could've never predicted this site's popularity would be based on a graphic rape scene...although you could predict who would've posted such a scene...HAHA jokes, gwiz is good people.
3) The creepiest part of this all, is the crazy comments this video attracted. It's like the destination-spot in a pilgrimage for creeps.


In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
In case you're interested, I think I accidentally figured out this mystery. After you pointed it out I kept noticing "rape" in the recent searches. Well earlier today I also saw "Monica Bellucci" in the recent searches. I thought that was an odd one, because I've seen next to no videos with her in them here, especially nothing in recent months, maybe even years. Anyway I clicked the Monica Bellucci tag and saw this video at the top. Lo and behold, it's a video about rape too. So I decided to read the comments, because I thought there surely must be some remarks about how controversial both this movie and this scene were, and I noticed this comment in particular. BINGO! He's right; people are coming here in search of a movie rape scene. "Rape" is a major source of searched-based traffic for VS.

So how about that? Think about what kind of lurkers we have? Makes me want to load a gun and wear a biohazard suit whenever I log in now.

This is acceptable


>> ^campionidelmondo:



I was gonna put thumbnails of my girly ankles on other people's videos, so I think we're all good.


No, the larger thumbs aren't covered by the NSFW thing. I have seen that thumb before, but rarely. I'm not sure what triggers the replacement


>> ^gwiz665:

Hmm, I'm pretty sure that the small thumbnails for nsfw pictures is hidden by default, aren't they for bigger ones?
Incidentally, I thank myself for getting them that way, since I posted this lovely piece with the best thumbnail ever.
http://videosift.com/video/The-ins-and-outs-of-a-Vagina
(Do not click at work!)
In any case it would be prudent to have a "SFW-ize my sift" option in your profile, so the thumbnails for nsfw are disabled and the standard siftbot is shown. Maybe a trenchcoat&sunglasses wearing flasher siftbot.

Hmm, I'm pretty sure that the small thumbnails for nsfw pictures is hidden by default, aren't they for bigger ones?

Incidentally, I thank myself for getting them that way, since I posted this lovely piece with the best thumbnail ever.
http://videosift.com/video/The-ins-and-outs-of-a-Vagina
(Do not click at work!)

In any case it would be prudent to have a "SFW-ize my sift" option in your profile, so the thumbnails for nsfw are disabled and the standard siftbot is shown. Maybe a trenchcoat&sunglasses wearing flasher siftbot.

A couple of nerd notes from me, please!

1. Superman and Lois copulated at the end of Superman II, but maybe that was only in the Richard Donner cut.

2. If memory serves didn't Superman return (in Superman Returns) in a crystal vessel? Is so he probably left in it, so the lack of the yellow sun wouldn't harm him in outer space.

3. When I was in film school the directing majors in my class had a phone in conversation with Robert Wise. Wise directed the first Star Trek (Star Trek the Motion Picture). Yes, it's slow. But, according to him, his point was that at that time in 1979 there wasn't a lot of big budget films that showed ships in space, so the long shots of the Enterprise were awe-inducing for the time.

4. Upon first viewing of Superman Returns, yes, I thought it was boring. I'm more of a Marvel fan anyways, but years later I picked it up on Blu-Ray and watched it again knowing ahead of time that the plot was slow. I don't believe there are huge plot holes. Also the story gets better once you drop your expectations for a "kick ass" comic book action-fest. The storytelling is well paced and interesting. It's not Dark Knight, but it's still good filmmaking. It's not brainless crap like Ghost Rider or the regrettable Daredevil.

5. WHAT THE FUCK IS KEVIN SMITH WEARING?! Long shorts down to his ankles and a fucking trenchcoat? He's wearing Juggalo attire. He looks ridiculous.

6. Red Dead Redemption is awesome. I don't care if that has nothing to do with this.

My two cents.

^Thanks for the unoriginal, incoherent, and exceptionally cliche rant. Im reemphasizing my quote to highlight the terror that you must instill in you neighbors. My only hope is that they do not read your VS comments and therefore do not fully understand your creepy weirdness. I am sorry that you hate life.

....oh wait, is that my house across the street....shit.


>> ^Confucius:
-And one more thing...can you imagine seeing your neighbor walk out into his yard with a trenchcoat, straw-hat and weird mask. Great job scaring the crap out of your neighbors and making them think [edit: reaffirming their belief] that they live next to one of the creepiest people in the world.

Wow....this should have gotten downvoted a couple of hundred times.

And uh....why hasn't anyone suggested that instead of getting a new TV he is just replacing his old one? Sitting in his living room right now, there is probably a 50" LED TV. He just took the opportunity to pretend he's going TV-less because somehow thats supposed to mean you're better. I dont have a TV either but I dont think that entitles me to call everyone else morons especially on a site devoted to the 'best of TV.'

-And one more thing...can you imagine seeing your neighbor walk out into his yard with a trenchcoat, straw-hat and weird mask. Great job scaring the crap out of your neighbors and making them think [edit: reaffirming their belief] that they live next to one of the creepiest people in the world.