*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Creepy-Dutch-TV-Host-Paedophile-or-no

Tags for this video have been changed from 'dutch, host, michael jackson, would, love, this, shit, paedo, boyfucker, NOT COOL' to 'dutch, host, paedophile, Paul de Leeuw' - edited by xxovercastxx

>> ^Payback:

"Remarkable restraint".
If it was me, I would have shoved my kid out the door and proceeded saved the State the costs of a trial and imprisonment.
Don't even TRY to tell me a jury of my peers would convict me.

ps: legacy, as you've checked the appropriate box, I will assume you're quoting QM or someone similar.


You'd leave your kid naked on the doorstep of a strange paedophile's house?

transcript:

Dear Benny, hi, how are ya? Love the hat by the way.

You may not have noticed but I've been absent for awhile,
I wanted to tell you why and how I've been finding my own style.
A new way of looking at the world beyond the errors of the past.
You see I've read all of your teachings and cant see how they'll last.
Where angels feared to tread has now become the beaten track
but for every step that we took forward, the church took two steps back.

It took you four hundred years just to pardon Galileo,
while the murderer of Hypatia still enjoys his saintly halo.
It was these hypocrisies of the church, that drove me from the flock
though I still clung to the ideas and kept some belief in stock
that Jesus really loved me and god was close at hand
and the day was fast approaching when we'd find the promised land.

When people could stand together and colour wouldn't mean a thing
but i slowly began to realise, thats not the message that god brings.
He constantly plays favourites setting nations against each other
tearing apart families, pitting brother against brother.
The jew and the gentile, the muslim and infidel,
the terrorist gaining heaven while their victims go to hell.

This god isn't worth my worship or the thanks that he demands,
and things have gotten so much better now the powers in our own hands.
Life expectancy has tripled, smallpox has been made extinct.
Our eyes pierced the veil of heaven and what was hazy is now distinct.
A cacophony of symphonies all composed in mathematics,
a ballet of matter and energy performing cosmic acrobatics.

Why didn't your book tell me I was born of a supernova.
Instead demanding belief in what an ancient madman told ya.
Houses can't catch leprosy, epilepsy's not possession
and when it comes to sex what the fucks with your obsession
with what grown men and women do in the privacy of their own home.
Why do you care where they put it? You've got problems of your own.

You let suffer the little children while the paedophiles protected,
the people wanted a shepard but its a wolf that was elected.
You spread disease and misery with every denial of tested science
so people remain upon their knees out of terror and compliance
so please excuse my harshness after breaking religions spell,
and if by chance your god is real, I'll save you a seat in hell.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Paedophile, pedophile, sounds more dirty to me' to 'Paedophile, pedophile, sounds more dirty to me, chris morris' - edited by Deano

>> ^Unaccommodated:

Hrrmm, doesn't feel right. "Restore rule of law"? I've always seen Anonymous as Chaotic Neutral, someone's not playing their character right.


Anonymous is nothing in particular. Its constituent parts are far too disparate in quality, intention, motivation, philosophy and character for any particular label or orientation to be correct.

Think of it like a cross-section of the internet. You've got some libertarian marxists, some catholics, some hacktivists, some pen-and-paper roleplayers, a sprinkling of psychopaths and more paedophiles than you'd ever want. Also, different "sorts" of Anonymous tend to gravitate towards different imageboards and a lot of the hacks down to a relatively small subsection of Anonymous which, generally, knows what it's doing. 4chan is less relevant than you'd think... It's just the biggest and, since 2007/8, is populated mostly by mental cases and children.

There's no way of stopping myself from giving a song that yodels "paedophile" in it a *promote

Peep Show have commissioned series 8 and 9, find out about that here: http://videosift.com/video/Matt-LeBlanc-David-Mitchell-Donald-Sutherland

/slut

Tags for this video have been changed from 'she ra, orko, kids, touching, paedophiles, public service announcement' to 'she ra, orko, kids, touching, paedophiles, public service announcement, TSA' - edited by sometimes

>> ^alien_concept:

Have you got a photographic memory or something?? I can't deny it though, you've got my number. Comments like that, a teen channel, job as a youth worker?? Call the fuckin cops!!!


Yes.

Also, this reminds me of how when people say, "Will somebody think of the children!?!", they are oblivious to the fact that it's precisely paedophiles who are constantly thinking about the children

Oh man that's too great, "the worst kind of paedophile there is..." *promote

That gargantuan fella with the glasses looks like he's had some serious doses of deep-fried heroin, miserable bastard!

"he asked me to pee all over him"... Paedophile, or R. Kelly fan?

Tags for this video have been changed from 'catholic, child, rape, priests, evil, coverup, pope, ratzinger' to 'catholic, child, rape, priests, evil, coverup, pope, ratzinger, paedophile' - edited by therealblankman

>> ^gwiz665:

Yeah just read up on it. I'm with you on your view regarding the video. I also think he's out of line with his insinuation. I do also think you should tone down the language in there; calling him a cunt will only escalate it, I think.
He can call you whatever he likes, even though it's not nice - and vice versa of course. There are some "rules" about personal attacks, but the attacks have to be pretty outrageous. I mean, look at what people tend to call QM every once in a while, and it's tolerated.
Throbbin's a nice guy, I guess he's just got an exposed nerve about this since he has little daughters (would be my guess).
In reply to this comment by dannym3141:
>> ^gwiz665:
O_o Who's been doing that?
In reply to this comment by dannym3141:
Is there something in the rulebook regarding people accusing me of being a child molester?

Check the comment i made last, then look above that one. I'm sure he meant it tongue in cheek but ... people - especially americans - over react to things like that. Or react without all the facts.
That and he's clearly several bricks short of a house, i'd like to see him warned for acting like an arse.


Fair enough, i'll stop even commenting.

He fits my description of scum of the earth - if you have kids, the last thing you should do is take it as a token to call everyone a paedophile for no reason.

I've looked up his pics online - I could take him.

There is a big difference between high school swim team camel toe and this? I don't see it. This young lady is engaged in photo shooting - showing off her gymnastic abilities in an iconic setting. She isn't intending to display and frame her snatch - that's just how you see it. Fucking perv.

I guess if you want to nitpick about the attire of a man lurking about a children's playground, you are purposely obfuscating the issue. When you live your life online, I guess real life issues changes your perspective on things.

Who said anything about vietnam? Do you know who the Phelps family is?

Too bad if you think she is an adult, she IS a minor - and if not legally, then practically. She says she's 17. How old are you? You fucking perv.

Regarding your cock and balls - there's a great deal difference between glancing at ass and filming a crotch in public. If you don't understand that I don't have the time nor inclination to explain it to you. And how would I even know that this perv was filming her crotch? How many handheld cameras still have an eye-piece for viewing? Most have a screen. Anyone who glanced over and saw his screen would see what he was doing. He's a fucking perv. Whether he did this to 'provoke' as an aspect of his professional persona, or if he's just a perv normally is irrelevant. It was inappropriate.

Porn shoot? In public? Surely you know this would be illegal (and for a good reason). "Discuss this situation, don't raise unparallel parallels."

Pretending that this is a poor innocent young girl? She visibly IS a poor, innocent young girl. She's there with what looks like her family and a professional photographer. This is not a sexual display, this is an artistic endeavour meant to focus on her artistic ability, not her snatch you perv.

I've studied the polarizing effect of the internet - where anonymity and the digital interface leads to people upholding stringent, abstract principles with little regard for real-world practicality and social norms. This seems to be a textbook case of this trend. "She is wearing tight pants and is raising her leg" does not equal "She wants people to look at her snatch - you can tell because she is wearing tight pants and is raising her leg".

Remind me to never leave DannyM with my kids.

>> ^dannym3141:

>> ^Throbbin:
I would have knocked the camera man out cold. Something being legal doesn't make something acceptable.
I'm not a puritan, I'm not religious, and I enjoy the feminine form as much as anyone - but I would not have accepted him standing around zoomed in on her crotch.
There are those of you who defend him for it being a public thing. Would you defend men in trench coats hanging around playgrounds? How about men with video cameras zoomed in on the crotches of a girls high school swim team? How about defending the Phelps family demonstrating in front of the funerals of dead soldiers? All perfectly legal, and I guess all perfectly legit with folks on VS.

Correction, you'd get knocked out by a surprised (and probably weedy) cameraman.
There's a pretty big difference between someone filming a high school swimming team's camel toe surreptitiously with obligatory shakey-cam and filming what looks to me like an adult woman WHO IS LITERALLY DISPLAYING AND FRAMING HER VAGINA IN THE MIDDLE OF A CROWDED STREET. And why is a trench coat any more offensive than for example, a neo-matrix coat? Why should the attire of a private detective draw your concern? And what the fuck has anything got do with vietnam?!?!? (war protesting)
If i saw this woman in the street and got chatting with her, it wouldn't even cross my mind that she was anything other than an adult. People referring to this woman as a minor, it makes me want to cry. I wonder if the modern awareness of paedophilia has brought as many false positives as it has genuine positives.
Do you know what? If i was so concerned about people seeing my cock and balls tightly sillhouetted against my tight shorts, i think i'd fucking refrain from posing - LITERALLY POSING - with my foot above my head whilst families walk past.
If you whipped this situation on its head and imagined that a porn star was doing what she was doing with a big sign saying "porn shoot", you'd get fat mothers and fathers waddling over to complain that they didn't want their children seeing bits and pieces on display. But because we're pretending that this is a poor innocent young girl who was just practising ballet oh yes sir poor lil ole me, suddenly we have to protect her poor innocence.
I just LOVE how people like you can see a video - one with utter moral ambiguity - and then say "Oh so you'd also let people stab a baby in the kidney? You want to make it a law that every school has to have at least 5 paedophiles working as teachers?" No, you mong. No one said those things. This situation is not "other situations". Discuss this situation, don't raise unparallel parallels.
In an ideal world, this video would have been titled "stupid exhibitionist bint shows her vagoo in the street, pervert films it, no one interrupts, everyone feels ashamed of the human race"
As for the post above me, man, no one i associate with would do this in the street and i think i could raise my children better when the time comes.

concur

>> ^dannym3141:
>> ^Throbbin:
I would have knocked the camera man out cold. Something being legal doesn't make something acceptable.
I'm not a puritan, I'm not religious, and I enjoy the feminine form as much as anyone - but I would not have accepted him standing around zoomed in on her crotch.
There are those of you who defend him for it being a public thing. Would you defend men in trench coats hanging around playgrounds? How about men with video cameras zoomed in on the crotches of a girls high school swim team? How about defending the Phelps family demonstrating in front of the funerals of dead soldiers? All perfectly legal, and I guess all perfectly legit with folks on VS.

Correction, you'd get knocked out by a surprised (and probably weedy) cameraman.
There's a pretty big difference between someone filming a high school swimming team's camel toe surreptitiously with obligatory shakey-cam and filming what looks to me like an adult woman WHO IS LITERALLY DISPLAYING AND FRAMING HER VAGINA IN THE MIDDLE OF A CROWDED STREET. And why is a trench coat any more offensive than for example, a neo-matrix coat? Why should the attire of a private detective draw your concern? And what the fuck has anything got do with vietnam?!?!? (war protesting)
If i saw this woman in the street and got chatting with her, it wouldn't even cross my mind that she was anything other than an adult. People referring to this woman as a minor, it makes me want to cry. I wonder if the modern awareness of paedophilia has brought as many false positives as it has genuine positives.
Do you know what? If i was so concerned about people seeing my cock and balls tightly sillhouetted against my tight shorts, i think i'd fucking refrain from posing - LITERALLY POSING - with my foot above my head whilst families walk past.
If you whipped this situation on its head and imagined that a porn star was doing what she was doing with a big sign saying "porn shoot", you'd get fat mothers and fathers waddling over to complain that they didn't want their children seeing bits and pieces on display. But because we're pretending that this is a poor innocent young girl who was just practising ballet oh yes sir poor lil ole me, suddenly we have to protect her poor innocence.
I just LOVE how people like you can see a video - one with utter moral ambiguity - and then say "Oh so you'd also let people stab a baby in the kidney? You want to make it a law that every school has to have at least 5 paedophiles working as teachers?" No, you mong. No one said those things. This situation is not "other situations". Discuss this situation, don't raise unparallel parallels.
In an ideal world, this video would have been titled "stupid exhibitionist bint shows her vagoo in the street, pervert films it, no one interrupts, everyone feels ashamed of the human race"
As for the post above me, man, no one i associate with would do this in the street and i think i could raise my children better when the time comes.