Thunder does not belong to anybody
So, no hard feelings.

In reply to this comment by FlowersInHisHair:
Sorry to steal your thunder! :

In reply to this comment by luxury_pie:
>> ^FlowersInHisHair:

How hypocritical of @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/shinyblurry" title="member since January 21st, 2011" class="profilelink">shinyblurry to accuse someone else of having a "heart filled with poison". The ridiculous, hateful and archaic dogma of sin and judgement that you subscribe to is an immoral poison to the modern world, giving rise to absurd and damaging situations like the religious exception to this law.
Equating homosexuals with paedophiles is a cowardly trick of misdirection and a false analogy. They are not the same, and you know it - a consenting homosexual couple harms no-one at all, whereas a paedophile who molests a child causing emotional damage that ripples out into the child's later life and relationships. Your argument is empty.


Maaan. I wanted to do that :

Sorry to steal your thunder!

In reply to this comment by luxury_pie:
>> ^FlowersInHisHair:

How hypocritical of @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/shinyblurry" title="member since January 21st, 2011" class="profilelink">shinyblurry to accuse someone else of having a "heart filled with poison". The ridiculous, hateful and archaic dogma of sin and judgement that you subscribe to is an immoral poison to the modern world, giving rise to absurd and damaging situations like the religious exception to this law.
Equating homosexuals with paedophiles is a cowardly trick of misdirection and a false analogy. They are not the same, and you know it - a consenting homosexual couple harms no-one at all, whereas a paedophile who molests a child causing emotional damage that ripples out into the child's later life and relationships. Your argument is empty.


Maaan. I wanted to do that :

>> ^FlowersInHisHair:

How hypocritical of @shinyblurry to accuse someone else of having a "heart filled with poison". The ridiculous, hateful and archaic dogma of sin and judgement that you subscribe to is an immoral poison to the modern world, giving rise to absurd and damaging situations like the religious exception to this law.
Equating homosexuals with paedophiles is a cowardly trick of misdirection and a false analogy. They are not the same, and you know it - a consenting homosexual couple harms no-one at all, whereas a paedophile who molests a child causing emotional damage that ripples out into the child's later life and relationships. Your argument is empty.


Maaan. I wanted to do that

How hypocritical of @shinyblurry to accuse someone else of having a "heart filled with poison". The ridiculous, hateful and archaic dogma of sin and judgement that you subscribe to is an immoral poison to the modern world, giving rise to absurd and damaging situations like the religious exception to this law.

Equating homosexuals with paedophiles is a cowardly trick of misdirection and a false analogy. They are not the same, and you know it - a consenting homosexual couple harms no-one at all, whereas a paedophile who molests a child causing emotional damage that ripples out into the child's later life and relationships. Your argument is empty.

Thanks for the promote A.C.

In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
I'm sorry this crosses the line for me, that is just fucking wrong.

*promote

>> ^budzos:
You think a manslaughter conviction should keep you from working at McDonald's? Why? You realize manslaughter is by definition involuntary? Even if it was murder in the first degree, what does that matter when it comes to making burgers?
>> ^artful_codger:
wow, 35 comments and i can't see anyone asking the question "Why, McDonalds, do you hire people convicted of Manslaughter!?". I wonder if Paedophiles prepare the happy meals.



abso-fucking-lutely, the events shown in the video speak for themselves, he's too volatile to be working anywhere near civilised human beings and Micky D's should know better. Manslaughter vs Murder means very little these days, it's just a plea-bargain to secure a quick conviction and avoid expensive protracted trials. He shot and killed his friend and the bullet also hit an 8 year old child.

Lol, yeah, why dont they just hire rocket scientist at McDonalds and we wouldnt have this proble, OH MY GOD, I FIGURED IT OUT. If everyone in the world became a rocket scientist, we would be too smart to even eat at a McDonalds.>> ^budzos:

You think a manslaughter conviction should keep you from working at McDonald's? Why? You realize manslaughter is by definition involuntary? Even if it was murder in the first degree, what does that matter when it comes to making burgers?
>> ^artful_codger:
wow, 35 comments and i can't see anyone asking the question "Why, McDonalds, do you hire people convicted of Manslaughter!?". I wonder if Paedophiles prepare the happy meals.

You think a manslaughter conviction should keep you from working at McDonald's? Why? You realize manslaughter is by definition involuntary? Even if it was murder in the first degree, what does that matter when it comes to making burgers?

>> ^artful_codger:

wow, 35 comments and i can't see anyone asking the question "Why, McDonalds, do you hire people convicted of Manslaughter!?". I wonder if Paedophiles prepare the happy meals.

wow, 35 comments and i can't see anyone asking the question "Why, McDonalds, do you hire people convicted of Manslaughter!?". I wonder if Paedophiles prepare the happy meals.

(Q)....How do you stop a paedophile from spitting??

(A)....Tell the guard to drop the voltage on the electric chair.

If there is a rule about such a thing as "please fuck off" it's news to me - i've had an established member of the community attempt to literally make things up and label me as a paedophile once and was told that was fair game.

However, i don't see why finding and quoting facts is trolling. Especially when you post a video that seems to me to be a conspiracy theory thing. You can't really post a video that suggests or implies things and then complain when someone attempts to disprove it in the comments. I'd say you've got more reason to complain if he wasn't quoting sources. Quoting sources makes his argument more acceptable if anything!

This video has been seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by chicchorea.

*isdupe>> ^xxovercastxx:

dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Creepy-Dutch-TV-Host-Paedophile-or-no

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by xxovercastxx. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.