The older I get, the more I have come to understand that porn is toxic to the human spirit. To be clear, I'm not talking about public sexuality, erotica, erotic themes in fiction or the appreciation of a nude human body. I'm talking about hardcore porn, which reduces one of the most beautiful forms of human interaction to a cheap, crude, exploitive and loveless financial transaction. I used to watch plenty of porn. Now I find it incredibly depressing.

Is this the most erotic reading of all time or what?

3 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.

You make it sound like that's a bad thing, my day isn't complete until I've watched a baby-mouthed crotch cannon fired from a homo erotically themed Segway.

How about:

I Want to Die HARD - John visits a brothel and embarks on a sexual journey that will lead him on an adventure full of climax and erotic discovery.

what about flying things.... birds and bees
http://www.rclol.com/img/drinking-water-in-space-sfw-yet-curiously-erotic.gif

He must've edited it after the misunderstanding.

In reply to this comment by UsesProzac:
He did say in the description...
In reply to this comment by deedub81:
You could have said so in the descriptions. I DID watch both videos and I didn't notice the difference.

In reply to this comment by seltar:
Double check next time, will ya? This was the original source, while the other one was a spoof ad.
In reply to this comment by deedub81:
You duped yourself? WTH? *dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

"Was clearly not a duplicate" MMMmmmmm....I wouldn't say "clearly."

I couldn't tell the difference after I watched it the first time. It instantly looked like a dupe. He should have specified the difference and then there would have been no confusion.

In reply to this comment by lucky760:
Your *dupeof/*isdupe privilege has been revoked for invoking against a video that was clearly not a duplicate or that was dead at the time (which means you could not possibly have known whether or not it was a dupe).

Your action caused a great deal of lost time on the duped post, which cost it all of its hotness and any chance at the Top 15, and a lot of wasted effort was required to undo your mistake.

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
You duped yourself? WTH? *dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

Sweet! I copied the embed code from that, and it seems to work!!
Thank you so much for your help!

In reply to this comment by lucky760:
Is this the original video?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/copyranter/silk-soy-milks-disgusting-ad-updated


In reply to this comment by seltar:
That is absolutely correct :

#2 was a spoofed ad with the Silk logo, sapia coloring, timeshift, different music, and some text.
#1 is the original source used for the spoof video.

#2 was dead at the time, so they just assumed, based on the thumbnail or not seeing the other video.

Thank you so much for your help! :

In reply to this comment by lucky760:
So, this video should be restored because it's correct:
#1 - http://videosift.com/video/Milk-in-her-face?noredirect

And this video should be *dead because the actual embed is unavailable and it was incorrectly given the above video's embed:
#2 - http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

Is all that correct? Let me know and if so, I'll undo the dupeof on #1 and I'll make dead #2.

Also, was #2 very obviously a different video than #1? In other words, was it an egregious and obvious error that those two members falsely agreed it was a dupe? Or was #2 just dead at the time, so they were just guessing it was a dupe?


In reply to this comment by seltar:
This might be the wrong place to ask this, but how can I undupe a video?

http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

That link was to a spoof ad, whilst the version that was wrongly duped was the original source.
The original source was all I could find after the spoof ad died, and it was quite different to the spoof ad - different music and no text, overlays, logos or branding.
So I decided to sift it separately, hoping that one day the spoof ad would resurface.

Is this something that should be handled in a Sift talk, or what?

Thanks for you input.

Per @seltar, the submitter of both videos, this is not a duplicate of: http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

That video submission was a parody of this video.

@deedub81 and @Fusionaut have lost their dupeof/isdupe privileges for carelessly killing this post as a dupe, which cost it all of its hotness and chance at the Top 15, and required wasted time and effort to undo their mistake.

That is absolutely correct

#2 was a spoofed ad with the Silk logo, sapia coloring, timeshift, different music, and some text.
#1 is the original source used for the spoof video.

#2 was dead at the time, so they just assumed, based on the thumbnail or not seeing the other video.

Thank you so much for your help!

In reply to this comment by lucky760:
So, this video should be restored because it's correct:
#1 - http://videosift.com/video/Milk-in-her-face?noredirect

And this video should be *dead because the actual embed is unavailable and it was incorrectly given the above video's embed:
#2 - http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

Is all that correct? Let me know and if so, I'll undo the dupeof on #1 and I'll make dead #2.

Also, was #2 very obviously a different video than #1? In other words, was it an egregious and obvious error that those two members falsely agreed it was a dupe? Or was #2 just dead at the time, so they were just guessing it was a dupe?


In reply to this comment by seltar:
This might be the wrong place to ask this, but how can I undupe a video?

http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

That link was to a spoof ad, whilst the version that was wrongly duped was the original source.
The original source was all I could find after the spoof ad died, and it was quite different to the spoof ad - different music and no text, overlays, logos or branding.
So I decided to sift it separately, hoping that one day the spoof ad would resurface.

Is this something that should be handled in a Sift talk, or what?

Thanks for you input.

This might be the wrong place to ask this, but how can I undupe a video?

http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

That link was to a spoof ad, whilst the version that was wrongly duped was the original source.
The original source was all I could find after the spoof ad died, and it was quite different to the spoof ad - different music and no text, overlays, logos or branding.
So I decided to sift it separately, hoping that one day the spoof ad would resurface.

Is this something that should be handled in a Sift talk, or what?

Thanks for you input.

Double check next time, will ya? This was the original source, while the other one was a spoof ad.
In reply to this comment by deedub81:
You duped yourself? WTH? *dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Strangely-erotic-milk-ad

@Fusionaut

I left this dead for a reason. The reason was that it was a completely different video.
The video I sifted here - which died - was a spoof ad for Silk milk.
The version you wrongly duped is the original source.

Now, how can I restore the other video, as I want to keep this for the spoof ad - if it ever appears again?

>> ^Fusionaut:

notdead

This video has been incorrectly seconded as a duplicate; transferring votes to the original video and killing this dupe - dupeof seconded with isdupe by Fusionaut.