search results matching tag: bummer

» channel: motorsports

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (18)     Sift Talk (1)     Blogs (4)     Comments (286)   

Congresswoman Shames IRS Contractor for Gaming System

harlequinn says...

Things to consider: What a bummer if she's wrong and she's simply venting her frustration on him. She did admit that they cannot tell if he has broken the law or not - said another way, he has not broken the law. She is also calling multiple doctors liars in regards to his diagnosis. He says he served so I assume it was a non-combat role since she said he never picked up a weapon. Way to denigrate all the supporting roles.

probie (Member Profile)

Water Bowl Prank Backfires

Trump Gets Trumped by David Letterman

HiLibtards says...

It's funny how jealous and vendictive liberals are. Liberals are the weak link in the United States. Trump would love to have his ties made here. He tries to shed light on the issues companies in the US are facing like Unions, high taxes, Obamacare etc.. Nothing will get better til O'bummer is out of office/impeached. I look forward to your ridiculous responses which won't consist of any originality or reality.

Wanted: YouTube to AVI download and converter (Howto Talk Post)

lucky760 says...

Bummer. Sorry to hear that. (I've never tried a very long file before.)

I've no experience with any desktop applications that fetch YouTube videos, but there's probably something like that out there.

Googling reveals a few results. Here's what's at the top of the search results.

Electric fence experiment ends as expected

Brother Missing in Bedroom Sinkhole

shatterdrose says...

Honestly, I don't get what everyone is bitching about. Cooper did exactly what any journalist would do, at least those with some tact and empathy. If this was for a print story, you would have only heard bits and pieces about what his brother was like. But on live tv, it's actually MUCH harder than any of you think to do what the stock holders want you to do, what the public expects you to do, and still be a human being to the person you're interviewing.

What is he supposed to say at this point? Hey man, sorry, but you're totally a bummer right now and well, we were hoping for something more ratings worthy than you sobbing about how much you miss your brother. On to the next one!

Move over Kurzweil: Cronkite dispenses some future knowledge

Cyclone Damage in Queensland....

Atheist TV host boots Christian for calling raped kid "evil"

shveddy says...

You are an a-godzilla-ist and that is entirely a practical concession to the fact that you can't really afford giant monster insurance considering recent statistics for giant lizard attacks and indeed going through life avoiding Tokyo at all costs is just kinda a bummer - imagine all the fresh sushi you could miss out on.

You can't actually prove that there never was a Godzilla or that there never will be a Godzilla and you can only assume (not demonstrate) that there is not a Godzilla planet orbiting one of the stars a few galaxies down the way.

All you can really say is that Tokyo is still standing and that all the various accounts of Godzilla's antics across the myriad of B-movies and hollywood blockbusters that feature him as a character seem to have no basis in reality for various reasons. You move on with your day, smile a bit and never really bother to duck for cover.

And that's all we're saying about God. To my knowledge, that is the bleeding edge of audacious claims being made by anyone who is even vaguely respected - simply that we can't take religious claims seriously any more, so we are going to move on with our lives, only dealing with religion directly when it decides to be a bit too influential for our tastes.

But fine, based on the secondary predicate principle and a lengthy philosophy 101 essay with no shortage of verbal meandering through Descartes, et al., atheists kinda sorta make a claim of some sort. What's your point.

And if you think that the atheist experience simply trawls the bottom of Christian intellectualism then who would you have them debate, Ray comfort? Matt Slick? Perhaps you?

More than anything, the most disgusting trait of Christianity is that it equates child rapists and children as equally sinful in the eyes of God. There are certainly various arguments saying that different consequences will be felt here on earth, or perhaps that there is an arbitrary age of innocence, etc... But almost universally, Christians agree that the following scenario is at least possible:

Rapist rapes child, we'll start with that.

The child struggles through the resultant torturous anguish across a lifetime, starts a support group, mans a hotline, works in the community to support fellow victims, increases awareness and so on while loving his/her family and friends, making mistakes periodically and occasionally letting loose at a concert or something. The child (now an adult) is unfortunately just a minimally observant Jew and never really gave Jesus any consideration, so when he/she gets hit by a drunk driver at the unfortunate age of 34, he/she is tormented in hell for the rest of eternity.

The rapist, meanwhile, goes on with his (statistically probable) life, perhaps he rapes some more children (also statistically probable) and maybe he then stops at some point, realizing it is wrong and maybe even feels guilty about it. Ridden by guilt, the preaching of a wayward street preacher catch his ears one day. He ventures into church for the first time. He is moved. He proclaims his belief in Jesus and the resurrection. He feels his sins are forgiven and he can feel years of guilt being washed away. Maybe he even admits his history as a rapist to a sympathetic inner circle of confidants, spiritual advisors and friends. He dies of a heart attack, and spends eternity in heaven.

That is disgusting and a god that sets such a system up is disgusting.

Many compassionate people are blinded into thinking this is just and good in an effort to tenaciously preserve their own sense of eternal safety and cosmic worth at all costs. That is less disgusting just because it is an understandable impulse, but it is disgusting nonetheless.

shinyblurry said:

An agnostic is someone who doesn't believe *or* disbelieve in God. An atheist is someone who believes God doesn't exist. If you think atheism means a "lack of belief" then watch this video by one of your contemporaries:

Last Resort Active Shooter Survival Measures by Alon Stivi

We're still alive! (History Talk Post)

Fastest way to eat corn

Fastest way to eat corn

Highest Resolution Machu Picchu Picture Ever Taken

deathcow says...

>> ^grinter:

>> ^deathcow:
Panorama Done!
frame 1920 of 1920
back LCD lights up
<< NO MEMORY CARD >>

I shot some sun rays breaking through the early morning mist over the mountains around Machu Picchu. It was gorgeous - dream lighting - and about an hour later realized that the camera was set to a ludicrously high ISO. I was devastated. I can't imagine how that guy would have felt if something had gone wrong.


Man... bummer... I hope you got some pictures you liked out of it anyway.

I shot a few hours of a galaxy through the telescope the other day with the ISO set on AUTO. Also a bummer but nothing compared to your story.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon