In reply to this comment by NinjaInHeat:
Shiny, lets assume for a moment that you're right, there is an after life, mr. god will judge us when we die and send us to the corner of shame and eternal hellfire to think about what we've done.

Fine, so I guess we can at least agree on one thing: until that day comes I will actually live, embrace life with all its temptation and unholiness, indulge the devil's ways and blaspheme my ass off, live, love, fuck, drink, hate, whatever the fuck I can get away with. And you, you sad little person, when that day comes you'll be as sad as you are today, you and the countless others who are an affront to life it self. And y'know what? I'll pick hellfire with the likes of Hitchens over your divine garden of twats any day.

Shiny, lets assume for a moment that you're right, there is an after life, mr. god will judge us when we die and send us to the corner of shame and eternal hellfire to think about what we've done.

Fine, so I guess we can at least agree on one thing: until that day comes I will actually live, embrace life with all its temptation and unholiness, indulge the devil's ways and blaspheme my ass off, live, love, fuck, drink, hate, whatever the fuck I can get away with. And you, you sad little person, when that day comes you'll be as sad as you are today, you and the countless others who are an affront to life it self. And y'know what? I'll pick hellfire with the likes of Hitchens over your divine garden of twats any day.

Hey well I do exist so you're just in denial. Yes, it's true, you won't be able to convert me to your mother science worshipping ways. That I love the Lord will never change, and neither would I put anything before Him.

I think it's rather childish of you two (so far) to summarily dismiss what I have to say. After all, Hutchins 'eloquent' fuck you to Christianity merits no response from a Christian, right? Since you want to claim its bogus I'll feel free to state the truth. You can meet me on terms like a grown up or you can bury your head in the sand like a little baby. Either way, it's no skin off my teeth.

I find this site primarily approves of anti-christian videos, and also its denizens seem to prefer them, at least as much as they are constantly promoted into the top 10 and lavished with praise by some of the most active members of this site. Hutchins, the so called great man and obviously the subject of a lot of hero worship on this site, is nothing more than a blasphemer, and he gets off on it. He enjoys it, and he also enjoys your praise and worship. He loves feeling right and it pleases him to no end when hordes of syncophants confirm all of his beliefs. Oh wait hes an atheist so he doesnt have beliefs right. An atheist is a singularity of unbelief..it is a nature onto to itself.

So with this anti-christian bent in mind, which is really quite apparent, I feel perfectly justified in responding to any of it. If you can't see that then it is your lack of understanding only.

>> ^Duckman33:
>> ^shinyblurry:
How is it that atheists seem to believe they can just go around and treat someone like garbage and talk down to them like children because they think they're right about something..why is this socially acceptable?

How is it that when I have conversations with Christians on youtube or any other open forum, once they find out I'm not religious, they talk down to me and tell me I'm going to "burn/rot in hell"? Call me a "sinner"? A "blasphemer"? They hope I "get cancer and die"? How is this socially acceptable?
I also have another question for you. How exactly did God "show himself" to you? You never really explained that one.


Christians are commanded to love thy neighbor as thyself. We are told the measure we use to judge will be measured back to us. When we observe that a law is being broken, we are justified in pointing this out to our brother, to correct the error of his way, in hopes he will turn from his sin. Now when you preach the gospel, you have to be aware that you will be judged by unbelievers by the same standards that you are proclaiming as truth, and hypocripsy will only denigrate Christs reputation. As a Christian, I admit that I am not perfect, which isn't really that difficult considering some of the more interesting choices I've made in life. Yet, if I strive to follow the standard set for me, which is perfection, my words will be justified and I will be an effective witness. This is the meaning of the measure we use being measured back to us.

So someone following Christs word should never tell you that you're going to burn and rot. That is utterly despicable. If you preach the gospel you are called to treat it with respect and care, because it is the Word of God. If you follow the word it comes naturally. No one who is following Christ in reality would say that to you. Christ promises that He is there to serve as our advocate before the Father, and obtaining forgiveness for our many sins through faith in Him.

Well, the way I knew it was God was..when I was a child God was with me. I just didn't notice it. The way that I was learning, seeing, experiencing..God was always there with me. He was an integral part of who I was, a secret friend who shared in my joys and sorrows. Later on in life I started to lose this connection. Life started to lose its electricity, it's spark, because our relationship was not as it should be. This is because I had begun to sin. I started shoplifting when I was 7 or 8 years old and I didn't stop for a long time. Now this may be looked upon as harmless in some way..I didn't ever really steal more than candy bars. But the law is the law. God was still there with me, supporting me, but because I was sinning it caused spiritual seperation from God.

This happened for a long time, gradually, until it was like living life alone. I had always been a loner..just akward socially, but this was different. The light went out of my life. There was no flow, at all. It had all stopped. I was only dimly aware of this transition at the time. It took me many years to piece together what happened. I had no idea God really existed. I was vaguely aware that He did; ie I was afraid of Him, but I also prayed a couple times and He answered my prayers. Then one day, suddenly, He showed me He was there. He showed me how His presence, His essence underlay all things. He showed me how He was working in reality. This isn't to say I comprehended it. It's just that I know what it feels like to be around Him a little bit and see what He does.

Note at this time I was not a Christian, I did not become a Christian until later on. He had showed me the nature of the Holy Trinity before I knew much about it, so it fit with what I already knew about God. The words of the bible spoke to what I knew about God, about His unconditional love for all of His children. So yeah, that's how I got to know God. It probably sounds strange but you know what they say. The Lord works in mysterious ways. I'm proof of that much.

>> ^shinyblurry:

How is it that atheists seem to believe they can just go around and treat someone like garbage and talk down to them like children because they think they're right about something..why is this socially acceptable?


How is it that when I have conversations with Christians on youtube or any other open forum, once they find out I'm not religious, they talk down to me and tell me I'm going to "burn/rot in hell"? Call me a "sinner"? A "blasphemer"? They hope I "get cancer and die"? How is this socially acceptable?

I also have another question for you. How exactly did God "show himself" to you? You never really explained that one.

Their central argument was that it is wrong to impute the harshest condemnation possible on a person when you know next to nothing about them. In other words - exactly what I said...


Actually, no, I dont think that was their point at all, They are saying its wrong because he does he knows next to nothing about WHY he believes what he believes. Let me put it this way: If we are to take the bible to be true, then obviously things are not looking up for us atheists, right? Now, blabbering about hellfire and so on might not be the most productive, and certainly not the nicest thing you can do to us, and its probably not what Jesus would have done, fine. We agree so far. But then there is Mark: Heres my guesses as to some of the stuff he believes:

He believes Jesus is the son of God
He believes Jesus died for all our sins
He believes we must repent to Jesus/God
He believes Jesus will forgive you if you do.
He Believes Jesus will come back to judge the living and the dead
He believes, that if you dont believe in Jesus or god, and blaspheme and sin and whatever, you will not get into heaven

Now, if Mark really, really believes all this (after all, it is the central theme of Christianity) Then I completely understand Mark if he wants to warn atheists about the perils they face if they keep up their disbelief, After all why shouldnt he? if the bible really IS true, I really hope someone warns me in time, seriously! The way it looks now is that I'm surfing the lake of fire before even the white tunnel appears.

But you see the problem is, there isnt a shred of evidence to suggest any of that nonsense is true, I might as well bet all my money(as if i had any) on Kim Jong Il to win the PGA Tour, after all, according to North Korean sources ( a country way ahead of the bronze age middle east, by the way) The fat little bastard had no less than 5 hole-in-ones in his first round of golf.

Lol, I've only had bourbon once and it didn't really impress me. I still haven't had any Canadian whiskey. Weird, eh?
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
And I don't like bourbon. I'd rather drink (ugh) Canadian whiskey.
In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
Gasp! Blasphemer! Shun the non-believer! SHUUUUUNNN!
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
The truth: I don't like scotch. I prefer regular whiskey, preferably blended, and even more preferably Irish whiskey. I just said scotch because it made the sentence flow better. I'm a wordsmith.
In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
Thank you! Oh, and can you recommend any good scotch?
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
I like my jazz as I like my scotch - smooth. Also my bowel movements.

And I don't like bourbon. I'd rather drink (ugh) Canadian whiskey.
In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
Gasp! Blasphemer! Shun the non-believer! SHUUUUUNNN!
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
The truth: I don't like scotch. I prefer regular whiskey, preferably blended, and even more preferably Irish whiskey. I just said scotch because it made the sentence flow better. I'm a wordsmith.
In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
Thank you! Oh, and can you recommend any good scotch?
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
I like my jazz as I like my scotch - smooth. Also my bowel movements.

Gasp! Blasphemer! Shun the non-believer! SHUUUUUNNN!
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
The truth: I don't like scotch. I prefer regular whiskey, preferably blended, and even more preferably Irish whiskey. I just said scotch because it made the sentence flow better. I'm a wordsmith.
In reply to this comment by Fusionaut:
Thank you! Oh, and can you recommend any good scotch?
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
I like my jazz as I like my scotch - smooth. Also my bowel movements.

Whisky with ice cubes??? BLASPHEMER!!!

Whisky with ice cubes??? BLASPHEMER!!!

I love how Condell pronounces Allah in Arabic, makes it all the more blasphemous!

The dude at 1:00 is gonna get a noodly apendage up his sphincter for blaspheming FSM.

Christ, some people here....suck. It's a silly song, and I bet Men Without Hats would be the first to admit that. How serious can one get about a song with lyrics encouraging you to act like an imbecile? Yet some obviously think this rendition is blasphemous. And then we have people here like westy who criticize a touching personal video just because the camera was a little shaky.

People - They're the worst.

In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
Yeah, I know right? Changing lyrics slightly equals SONG IMPLOSION!!!

>> ^Lawdeedaw:

>> ^acidSpine:
Queer for sure! Lol, he asks the kids to leave after discussing the ass-licking and fisting. I think this deserves a religion tag too

No it does not deserve a religious tag. Simply because he is a retard, and he promotes hate, and he is religious and uses it for excuse, does not mean that even half of half the religious people believe this stupid hype.


Uh, he's promoting Christianity. It's not our fault that the doctrine of Christianity is inherently hateful.

Edit:
Your education and standard of living allows you to pick and choose (buffet-style) the parts you like/dislike and then selfishly claim that only yours is the one True Christianity™ and all those other "retards" are just blasphemers, poseurs. In fact they're more Christian than the sophists will ever be.

The less Christian in the true sense one is, as so defined in the Bible, the better. Unfortunately, this involves a good amount of self-deception to remain internally consistent (and to still remain Christian in any meaningful way), avoiding any of that nasty cognitive dissonance from rearing its ugly head.

Also, DA POO POO.