Yar, total agreement.

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Nice one, Captain. Your duplicity got one of the nicest guys here temporarily banned. I hope everyone here remembers your role in this incident. Not like you had any admirers in the first place, youngling.

Nice one, Captain. Your duplicity got one of the nicest guys here temporarily banned. I hope everyone here remembers your role in this incident. Not like you had any admirers in the first place, youngling.

>> ^CaptainPlanet420:
To the youngling who asked why he was pulled over - he made a right hand turn from the center lane. Sounds safe to me, right? I mean, I generally have multi-lane lapses in judgment when making turns.


Do you even fully read comments before insulting people? Yes, I asked why he was pulled over because it wasn't included in the video. This was right after I stated that driving while excessively high is dangerous. All I said was that weed shouldn't be illegal (like alcohol), even though I also said I would support a field sobriety test for marijuana.

So please, if you're going to insult someone, at least try to understand what they typed in the first place.

If all your naive arguments are predicated on the fact the "marijuana doesn't impair your ability to drive," then you must try harder. I told you politicians-in-diapers about your shortsightedness weeks ago.

To the youngling who asked why he was pulled over - he made a right hand turn from the center lane. Sounds safe to me, right? I mean, I generally have multi-lane lapses in judgment when making turns.

But it's not a narcotic, huh. So ya, I'm sure drinking some caffeine could also make me turn right from the center lane. Wait, no. And it never leads to harder drugs either, so all the crack in his car must have just jumped in there. So you can cry the burglars roam free while this happened, but next time when Bob Marley kills a family of four with his driving incompetence, we'll see who is the greater evil.

>> ^CaptainPlanet420:
Again, the purposeful incoherence of the chogster greatly overshadows all your youngling comments.


You're such a fucking retarded turd. Seriously.

Sorry everyone, that was my outburst for the week. Couldn't help it.

Again, the purposeful incoherence of the chogster greatly overshadows all your youngling comments.

don't h8 choggie just because he's a misunderstood genius that thinks on a higher level than u younglings

omg will u younglings ever stop with these. def leppard's 1 arm > meg white > this.

>> ^CaptWillard:
>> ^CaptainPlanet420:
Wonderful, now scores of you younglings here on Atheisift gather behind supposed "biblical preaching." Please pick a side, kthxbai?

Tell us about the good old days, oldling. You know, when a black man knew his place, and gay "losers" stayed in the closet for fear of being arrested or beaten to death. Tell us about how the good white Christian preachers in the Bible Belt used the Good Book to justify slavery and racism. These Atheisifters need to know what it is to be the same kind of upstanding Christian that you are.


Ah yes, it's the religion of Convenience. Perhaps if the preachers of old were wrong once, another could be wrong now? But that would be inconvenient huh. Pick a side son, pick a side.

>> ^CaptainPlanet420:
Wonderful, now scores of you younglings here on Atheisift gather behind supposed "biblical preaching." Please pick a side, kthxbai?

Tell us about the good old days, oldling. You know, when a black man knew his place, and gay "losers" stayed in the closet for fear of being arrested or beaten to death. Tell us about how the good white Christian preachers in the Bible Belt used the Good Book to justify slavery and racism. These Atheisifters need to know what it is to be the same kind of upstanding Christian that you are.

Wonderful, now scores of you younglings here on Atheisift gather behind supposed "biblical preaching." Please pick a side, kthxbai?

Well, it's good to know it's still the white man's fault. You younglings forget long sentences rely more on delivery than substance. oh noes!!!1111

^ entirely possible, banky.
his choice of adjectives was obviously no accident,
but maybe he was just trying to be clever.

at any rate, capn, there's no reason to feign acceptance now.
you already made it perfectly clear, what you actually think.

and you're entitled to think whatever the fuck you want, of course.
and we're entitled to laugh, in reply.
at what many of us see as intellectual & sexual insecurity.
and tell you so. but, because we're not asshats, we'll also try to help you.

so, youngling, please think (honestly, with an open mind, and dump the ego)
about the following 3 items:


1. (the biological approach, since it was your primary argument initially)
ok. so, you've managed to think of the easiest reason,
why biology wouldn't favor homo- or bi-sexuality.

congrats. now, stop being intellectually lazy, and use your brain the way you're clearly capable of. tell me 3 reasons why biology would favor bisexuality.

2. (the funny-but-true approach)
if there were anyone, that would do (or pay) *anything*, to un-gayify another human being, that someone would be Dick Cheney.

3. (personal experience)
have you ever been in love? i mean really. because i have, once.
and you'll find most people who have, agree on this: you don't choose, who you fall in love with.

peace @ 4:20
- owen / m15

^"Younglings, how does science prove queers are legit?"

CaptainPlanet, how does science prove YOU are legit?

>> ^CaptainPlanet420:
Well, I see things have gotten out of control in my absence. Good try Bill O, but you must convince these younglings in their own words.
Younglings, how does science prove queers are legit? Oh wait, it doesn't, because if all you gay people were truly gay, you'd be making no kids, and that'd leave only a few of us, and we couldn't repopulate the world quickly enough after you losers die. Nature dictates, younglings.

I can't tell if you're implying that homosexuality is hereditary. I've said this before, and I stick to it, somebody having a sexual attraction and inclination towards the same sex is no different than my sexual attraction and inclination towards asian women, latin women, round asses, caramel colored skin, and well-pedicured feet. Just because it's with the opposite sex, it doesn't make it more "normal" or any more "natural" for that matter.

A mixture of genetic predisposition affecting hormonal balance and events in one's life are what lead to that person's sexual identity. Yes, I did mention events in one's life. Does that mean that a child being raised by homosexuals will grow up to be homosexual? The answer is no, for the same reason my mother is the antithesis of what I look for in a sexual partner (suck on that Freud). Also, for the same reason children raised in straight families realize that they're homosexual. Usually this sexual identity is realized at a young age, but it's hard for the child to recognize what this means until they become sexually mature.

Lay off gay people, they won't affect you anymore than the straight guys will. In fact, you should be more wary of straight guys because guys like me will steal your woman away and not think twice about it. Your nightmares of being pounded in the ass against your will won't seem as bad as the realization that your lovely "shnukems" is taking some other guy's hot load all over her face...

...who should you REALLY fear?