Didn't care much for this one in comparison to the others he's done. The trailer was quite good i thought though.

Other You suck at cooking vids on the sift.

Your video, Baked Yams with Dill - You Suck at Cooking, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 8 Badge!

Ah Asmo, this is humorous. Not in a way that has me thinking less of you, but due to the fact that even the smartest people make the most indefensible arguments. Stewart always has a joke when Republicans (and sometimes Democrats) do the same thing Chaos just did and which you defended--which is to ignore the "implied" in a statement. Usually Republicans use hate speech or such, but they just don't say the hate literally (Often when Obama's policies were compared to Nazi Germany's policies, for example.)

I.e, "Hey, I'm not saying Obama is like Hitler, but look at the smoke stacks coming from the White House?! They look like Jew smoke to you?!"

Another, but this one in more relation to our conversation.

I.e., Hey Lawdeedaw, when you have dick in your mouth does it taste good? WOAH, I DIDN'T SAY YOU SUCK DICK! YOU IMPLIED THAT! I just asked, you know, when dick is in your mouth...

See how utterly indefensible that above statement is? Or why Stewart gets so pissed, rightly so, when people make that argument? People can hide behind the most obvious statements and it's bullshit. Or people can be ignorant of the statements you make, and it's just as bullshit.

If you can't see the sense that makes, don't respond to this post please. I don't argue with ideology that blinds people to clear points and I have agreed with my fair share of points over the years when I have been wrong...so I expect it returned in kind.

Second, you do have a point about me being judgmental. I am jaded because every marriage I observed growing up was toxic. "Dad can't divorce mom, even tho she abuses us kids." Was a wonderful house I lived in. My wife was beaten for years by her husband, until she took poverty and destitution over that, and then met me. The list goes on and on, yada yada, no more need to explain my own life history because it isn't necessarily what happens in all of America. So I look at the worst aspects of marriage. Aspects that are as universal as the fact that we eat, breathe, shit and die.

Of course I also use history and stats to back up my judgment. So; marriage is a civil contract based on liberty and property (At least the part of marriage that matters to the government insofar as the rights they give you.) If the world's population of homosexuals is around 2.5% or so, depending on the estimates, then cheating (seeking out more than one relationship at a time) is much more naturally inherent to humans than sexual orientation by far. This is also natural in regards to the homosexual relationships as well. Cheating causes so much grief, repercussions, and yet it is only one bad aspect of being tied into a contract that many societies make difficult to break either through legal means or cultural taboos. Furthermore, abuse, divorce, long-term separation for business matters, much of these things kind of lend credence to the fact that marriage is created by society and has nothing to do with the "apparent" definitions we apply to it.

And Asmo, naughty naughty Asmo, you implied something...I am in no way shape or form telling other people what "their relationship is about." Just because I say something is inconvenient for damn near everyone (For some it is not) doesn't really mean much of anything. Shoes are inconvenient because you have to tie their laces. Is that me telling you how to shoe? No. How about kids? Kids are a hell of an inconvenience, but if you said I was degrading parenthood, especially my own, I would tell you to fuck yourself with that bold-faced lie.

If you are focused on the "property" aspect of that comment, well, you have an issue with my definition of the government's hand in marriage.

You suck at your job, but i'm guessing you're well aware if it already.

Quoting @Sagemind:

"Though the little car shouldn't have forced this… the trucker is at fault for not preventing a collision that was avoidable.

The National Safety Council, defines a preventable collision as one in which the driver failed to do everything that they reasonably could have done to avoid it.

The American Trucking Association, uses the following rule to determine the preventability of a collision: “Was the vehicle driven in such a way to make due allowance for the conditions of the road, weather, and traffic and to also assure that the mistakes of other drivers did not involve the driver in a collision?”

Here on this video you can see that the trucker didn't back off, allow the car in, and prevent the collision.

I bet everyone knows that the most important rule in every US state is that you are guilty if you could have reasonably done something to prevent a collision, and didn't.

That's the law. You are at fault anytime you could have prevented a collsion and didn't."

Likely YOU don't realize how much YOU suck at driving. ;-)

No, the car was in the wrong and acting like a dickhead.

It's happened to all of us and it's annoying as hell, but you suck it up, act like a grown up and realise that sometimes inconsiderate assholes get ahead in life.

What you don't do is go "fuck it, I'm in the right" and plough into them, as tempting as it is to teach them a lesson (especially when you're going to come out on top, like the truck).

The correct response is to tailgate the motherfucker until they realise what a terrible human being they are and bow to your moral superiority. Failing that, follow them home and explain to their family why they fail at life.

He was passing the semi.. just not as fast as the 2 other cars. Unfortunately the law does not give exceptions for people "passing too slowly". Not one but BOTH cars were pulling unsafe maneuvers because they thought they should be able to pass the semi faster and ahead of the truck in the left lane. That is now how it works.

Maybe you don't realize how much you suck at driving. -_-

If at first you don't succeed, well, maybe you suck.

"When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me."

Ya, but then you suck at being a dad.

There ya go luney Upvote for calling douche when you see it-

Oh and Caddy? You suck. After ten years you stop making 80% of replacement parts for your vehicles so your electric car?? Wouldn't touch any electric car with a ten-foot-pole, especially yours. Even their service department employees are fulla douchebags...

Willing to guess..that the so-called heckler there who asked Obama aloud his inane shit and reset the wannabe president's unscripted ass, was followed home by assholes, or is inna box being questioned somewhere as we speak so....fuck all you Obama dick-riders out there, you suck sweaty, unwashed and hope-ridden ballzack

Oh wait! You can vote for someone else in one of the 2 parties that makes you feeeeel goood because of what you heard while trying to decide what frappa-latte-jizmo yer gonna have for the fast-breaking, non-nutritive brain-lozenge before unconsciousness grips you and then beddy-bye.

There's yer choice peeps. 1 of 2 shit-heals, whoever they may be.

Election 2016-As flat 'n refreshing as an un-fizzy soda pop found in a bus terminal with some hideous shade of lipstick on the cap and you drink it anyway...cause yer whore-mongering ways are so, so cozy....

....gonna write-in 'cocksucker' when floating by the polls next go-round, maybe watch some Finnish porn after-

If he wasn't so far off his kilter. He doesn't use Social Media but uses YouTube?

YouTube already had top comments anyway.

And it sounds like he's bitching about what YouTube was already trying to do, but they finally made it work.

The Real Name deal, yeah, I like that. I'd rather people do that. Why? Because as it stands, who cares about YouTube comments anyway? It's the cesspool of the internet. So if less people comment, it might not be bad thing.

Lastly, his comments about Google+ and YouTube . . . well, guess what dumbass, Google bought YouTube to make money. Not to keep your fantasies of internet anonymity alive. The people bringing YouTube down are those who feel they can never receive backlash, such as the bullies who follow their classmates and harass them, or just simply the HNG's who comment on 15 year old girls videos about what sexual act they'd love to perform on them, or the more mundane "you suck and you should die" comments. Hell, does no one remember that being the reason Rebecca Black skyrocketed to a household name? It wasn't because her song was good, or that bad really, it was because the YouTube comments became the base bottom of humanity . . . and the irony being those who hated her and told her to die, made her big money (which, I believe, she gave away).

So yeah, this guy can go whine in another YouTube video about YouTube and when they change something again, I'm sure he'll be there as well.

http://www.cracked.com/blog/why-stupid-youtube-comments-are-older-than-internet/

Seriously videosift.. you suck. -_-

When 2 minute 40 second reviews of a game in beta make the top 15..and why.. because he is well known sifter? NEVER review something based on beta.

boy, you suck in 6 languages