search results matching tag: upvote
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.011 seconds
Videos (117) | Sift Talk (164) | Blogs (36) | Comments (1000) |
Videos (117) | Sift Talk (164) | Blogs (36) | Comments (1000) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Biden: "I'm going to beat Joe Biden" Skip to 10:10
Whether you plan to vote for him or not, you have to admit that shit is funny. Have an upvote from me.
AXE Anarchy - Déclenche le chaos
I'd give you three upvotes if I could:
1 for the thumbnail
1 for the ad itself
and 1 for parle en français!
Family Matters Meets Die Hard
Fuckin'-A right upvote for Tom Waits!
Upvote for Tom Waits.
https://videosift.com/video/Free-The-Glutens-Tom-Waits-Interview-2015-Letterman
Family Matters Meets Die Hard
Upvote for Tom Waits.
https://videosift.com/video/Free-The-Glutens-Tom-Waits-Interview-2015-Letterman
Weird Al Yankovic-One More Minute - Social Distancing Anthem
Wish I could upvote 1000 times! Favorite song from my childhood...
Honest Government Ad | Corona virus: Flatten The Curve
Upvoted for "bog roll"
Are you ready for this? Carolina Reaper Challenge.
Upvote for the thumbnail alone.
Tool - Stinkfist But It's We Are Never Getting Back Together
Upvoted for a wrong factor of 9.
More disturbing than the original by far.
God damnit Chug.
The reason for my comment was to point out that people clearly adore this animal (if the up votes are anything to go by), and the disparity of how this animal will be treated.
Indeed if we did even the most humane slaughter to our pets, we would call it hell, and be arrested for our barbarism. But for a cow? It's legal, but even still we better hide it away.
I wonder how many people would have upvoted this video if we saw the rest of the farming process, as "humane" as it is.
I didn't straw man anything. His argument was that the animal is about to "go through hell" in "a few days".
My counter is that the animal is not going to go through hell (not abused) and will be living for more than a few days. I backed that assertion up with facts that I am familiar with for the subject matter. I didn't even mention other inaccuracies about the butchering process that really have nothing to do with the animal going "through hell" since it has been rendered unconscious before anything happens.
Does every fact in his description have to be 100% false for his overall analysis to be repudiated? Seems like a high bar for challenging an opinion.
Fire Sled
Part of me feels dirty for upvoting this, since attention is clearly what these idiots want.
Jason Momoa Always Visits Emilia Clarke When He's In London
Upvoted for the coat switch, they both looked better!
Mr. Blue Sky | Electric Light Orchestra | Pomplamoose
ELO?
That's an upvote right there!!
Dr. Bart Ehrman Historically accurate criticism of the Bible
"Fables aren't history" is a lesson that shouldn't take an hour and a half to teach.
I'm actually incredulous that 45 people watched the entire thing.....oh, on closer examination 16 people upvoted it, and Sifty voted 29 times? Whaaaaa?
Voluntary infestation with nasal leech
Me too. I gave upvotes though.
I reeeeeeealy don't want to even push play on this video.
Two pussies and a tub / Kitten falls in bathtub.
Eh, it's funny enough. I used both titles! Maybe it will get more upvotes.
Just to be clear, I wasn't requesting a new title. Just making the obvious joke.