"I guess there's bad blood between Affleck and Olbermann."

No, not really. Olbermann liked the skit... never complained about it once.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYbI1zS2Pmk

They talked about the skit for much of the show, but that clip shows the general attitude he had towards it.

Obama has plans to slash federal spending to the bone, and decrease government size and complexity. Im not seeing how you can equate that to a creation of a socialist state.

If what you say is true, Obama would be upfront about it. He's not, because he's either lying or delusional. In no way will this guy shrink government down...not saying McCain will either, but McCain won't expand it the way Barry will.

Colin Powell says it well, a re-evaluation of the taxation system is not socialism, its responsible governing. Lest you apply those same metrics to bush when he got in power and changed the way the tax system worked, then Obama is not a socialist.

Powell is a well-fed traitor to those to helped raise him up (all Republicans). The man was a mediocre general and knows nothing about economics, except he demands his speaking fees up front. He's a minor disappointment with a minor impact on the election.

Face it QM, the republicans have bought the nation on the brink of collapse, both economically and militarily by committing the nations forces to an ilegal, unjust, vague war, and de-regulating the economy and allowing greed to be the controlling factor in the market.

We WON the war in Iraq, which has a stable government. While it's true that Republicans became fat and lazy the past 8 years (spending like liberals on the back of 9-11) it was not "deregulation" that caused market collapses but shifting government force to other things, like Democrats forcing Fan/Fred to give loans to unqualified applicants. You can't blame the free market, because people are wisely frugal when it's their money being spent, but when Big Government backs up any losses, then people become like drunk gamblers in Vegas...with other peoples' money.

When the history pages are written, the past 8 years will doubtfully look kind on Bush and his administration, for their failed economic policy, their failed foreign policy, their failure to address katrina, their failure to be diplomatic with rogue-leaning nations, their failure to maintain basic infrastructure, their failure to keep some modicum of peace in the middle east, their failure to govern responsibly and impartially for EVERY american (and not just the rich republicans), their failure to address global warming, their failure on promoting good science.....on literally every level, the cons have failed to deliver progressing the nation, and the world over the past 8 years.

I have no doubt marxist professors at liberal-run universities (along with the MSM) will write all of the above, but they've never been right about anything, that's why they and their "theories" hide in universities instead of cutting their teeth in the real world. Slouching towards socialism isn't "progressive" to the rest of us. I know you can't believe me, you'll have to wait another 50 years when global warming has done nothing new.

Entanglement with churches, guns, gay rights, the annihilation of basic civil liberties...the list gos on.

A mantra that has little to back it up. I see no decrease in civil liberties for any American. Gays have more phony "rights" than ever. Liberals hate religion but guess what?--it's here to stay. Gun ownership was just confirmed as an individual right.

I dont understand how you can consistantly sit there and keep pushing the line that anyone not republican, is a terrorist / communist / socialist / generic-bad-guy, given the history of the past 8 years...just astounding how partisan you are.

The reality of the situation is this: you cannot have one-half of the population trying to go at it their own way, making mistakes and poor choices that are an inherent part of freedom and hopefully learning from them, and then have another half expecting the government to take care of them like they were children, and getting the monies to do so off the first group. Whether you know it or not, America is in the midst of a civil war of values. Republicans range in opinion from Ron Paul to Pat Buchanan, so "partisan" doesn't describe things so accurately.

And lets not even get me started on the topic of republican socialism with the bailout...seriously man, get a grip.

Of course it's wrong, but it's an aberration, and unfortunately, is mostly clean-up of Democrat-created messes. There will be blood in the Republican Party, but first, Marx must be defeated.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'fight, slowmo, breast cancer' to 'fight, slowmo, breast cancer, south park, snatch, there will be blood' - edited by Fjnbk

Tags for this video have been changed from 'happy tree friends, comedy, there will be blood' to 'happy tree friends, comedy, blood' - edited by Sarzy

Amusing, but I kept waiting for there to be some kind of reference to There Will Be Blood...

Good job CP. Unfortunately, you are pissing up a rope here. They've got such raging hard-ons for McCain here that there's no blood in their haeds to know that they are once again being duped. It's like talking to your dog...

For all of you saying..."wheres the bood"....you watch way to much TV. I once cut my leg on a piece of sheet metal...it was about 3 inches wide and about half an inch deep.....guess what....for the first 10 minutes there was no blood at all. It's called shock....ever hear of that guy in Oregon who got his arm crushed by a tree he was cutting down....after a while he decided to cut his arm off intead of being trapped and dieing out there.....I bet there wasn't very much blood from that either.....he's still alive. Oh and by the way...they did take cover. They took cover behind the van. So stop acting like your a bunch of experts when clearly your not.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'daniel, day, lewis, there, will, be, blood, paul, thomas, anderson' to 'daniel day lewis, there will be blood, paul thomas anderson, cinema, art' - edited by lucky760

cool, another quick fix.

In reply to this comment by therealblankman:
*fixed, but crappy embed with crappier watermark.

In reply to this comment by jonny:
*dead

*fixed, but crappy embed with crappier watermark.

In reply to this comment by jonny:
*dead

As someone who works with these children here are some things you should be aware of

1. You can't "cure" autism because they don't know what causes it.
2. there is no evidence to prove vaccines are the cause. Children are diagnosed with Autism from ages 1-5 which yes is around the time they are vacinated.
3. Children are diagnosed with Autism by watching behaviors, meaning there is no blood test or brain scan to find it. you can't cure behaviors, only help a child adjust and cope
4. the most popular belief is that you can be genetically predisposed and have an environmental factor help kick it in
5. There is no research to prove special diets help
6. Anecdotal evidence IS NOT scientific!
7. every child with autism is special and unique

I was immediately lead to, 'gee why is there so much blood coming from his crotch', which in turn was quickly followed by the following thought, 'Wow I really really don't want to know'

I WILL DESTROY YOU!

No, I'm just kidding. Or am I? No, I am. But seriously, what film are you under the mistaken impression is better than There Will Be Blood? And the only acceptable answer here is No Country For Old Men, though I suppose I could also accept the Darjeeling Limited.

This is slightly off-topic, but I have to admit that I can no longer hear the word "pipeline" without thinking of There Will Be Blood.

^Yes, Robert Elswit was a great win! What makes him so great is how flexible he can be as a DP. Did you read about There Will Be Blood in American Cinematographer? After reading that article, you'd have a lot more respect for him.

Though, as for PT not getting Best Director, I have to agree with the Academy. Coens did a pretty amazing job at directing the No Country film - the tension of the first two Acts were indescribable. But I do think There Will Be Blood should have won Best Picture.