*dead
you have a knack for posting copywritten takedowns.
revealing something about your personal habits, perhaps?

>> ^Boise_Lib:

Copyright takedown in 3...2...1...


Nah they flipped the video so they'll never find it

Copyright takedown in 3...2...1...

>> ^radx:

Well, Cenk dialled down his antics for his Wolf-PAC presentation at Columbia two months ago. To be honest though, I rather enjoy his antics, just like I enjoy Cenk's/Ben's epic rants and Michael's/Steven's more serious commentaries.
It's good entertainment.

I mostly agree with you. I enjoy Cenk's takedowns of hypocrisy immensely.

He has, on occasion, gone overboard.
And his catch phrases can be overused.
Mostly entertaining tho.

*dead from YouTube copyright takedown

I wasn't that impressed with Koppel's "takedown" at first. He said what others on O'Rielly's show have said, and got the same response from the fool. But that kiss at end... awesome! Was NOT expecting that.

Bazzer takedown notice in 3.. 2.. 1..

There are new versions of this video with the Walmart logo removed, since that was what caused the takedowns on the original.

This one seems to be intact... and is still up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cCo9amnue4

Pretty good song, and also pretty smart idea. Very smart to feature prominently Starbucks and to mention and gesture as to just how great Starbucks is. So then Starbucks won't ask for a takedown as they see it as free publicity.

Nice work sir. Nice work.

>> ^Kreegath:

Disregarding that the takedowns of those videos might be an overreaction, the person making this video comes off as almost absurdly overly sensitive about having his stuff taken down.


You might want to look up the backstory first. This person has been harassed in a large variety of ways because of his anti-religion (especially anti-islam) stance on YT, the most recent wave of attacks coming from Dawahfilms mentioned. Also, the takedown of his videos "might be an overreaction"? They're not even an overreaction, they are a systematic (and long-lasting) attempt at censorship of criticism of religion. That a company based in the so-called "free world" bends itself over backwards for religious extremists is something worth being "sensitive" about.

Disregarding that the takedowns of those videos might be an overreaction, the person making this video comes off as almost absurdly overly sensitive about having his stuff taken down.

>> ^marinara:

I'm really tired of youtube. This is why we need net-neutrality. So we can just leave youtube behind.
And this is happening more and more, literally 2 days ago, they took down a JFK conspiracy video. supposedly due to violent content (a certain gunshot)
really this is a huge problem.
It only takes a few takedowns... to shift the expectations of people. People will start editing what they say, just so there is no chance of being taken down.


FYI, governments have bad track records with keeping things open and free, ask Bradly Manning.

here's a pop song about youtube takedowns

I'm really tired of youtube. This is why we need net-neutrality. So we can just leave youtube behind.

And this is happening more and more, literally 2 days ago, they took down a JFK conspiracy video. supposedly due to violent content (a certain gunshot)

really this is a huge problem.
It only takes a few takedowns... to shift the expectations of people. People will start editing what they say, just so there is no chance of being taken down.

glad u liked it and thanks!

In reply to this comment by hpqp:
*blimey