Hope this is the right copy....Spank yourself hard if I got it wrong??

Just cut them in half and spank the seeds out into a bowl by hitting the back with a wooden spoon. You chop a few seeds, but you can still eat the cut seeds just as well as the whole ones, and it's much quicker than this!

#1 Youtube Comment " I bet his spanks are amazing " lawl

So many people need to be spanked repeatedly-We should start with her mother, make the kid watch.

I'm pretty sure that if it wasn't staged Bieber wouldn't have continued to sit there after being spanked with a belt. So definitely staged, sorry to disappoint.

Your video, 10 Second Dad - Momma needs a spanking, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Haha! Though I can see your point and do agree it would be best for people to get to know you better before making waves, the maturity level of the members on this site might surprise you. Sure there are fucks flying around here and there, but rarely in that sort of way...they are almost always accompanied by a rational explanation or a bit of humor and I don't think it would matter if you were a long time member or a brand spanking new one...I'm pretty certain you would receive the same type of response.

Yep, for a certain amount of time when you're a brand spanking new member you can't submit private comments because spammers used to sign up and start private spamming other member profiles.

Whoa, Alexis Goldstein needs a terse spanking!

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Rookie Chris Weidman spanks the Champion Anderson

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c76_1373245049

"we don't spank our monkey"

No, but absence of evidence is absence of evidence. Do I need more periods for that to make sense? Reports/leads. are. not. factual. evidence.
Are you suggesting that they should have had the right to invade any home or neighborhood that a tipster mentioned to them, because you seem to be. And you call me a nutjob? Hmmm.
To address your previous rant...
Because one person may have posed a danger to some does not suspend the rule of law, which requires EVIDENCE, not a guess, that there is actually 'imminent danger' of harm or destruction of evidence or escape...they could not have had that for random searches in Boston, if there were any.
I agree, your ignorance is embarrassing. Searching based on hunch or guess is unreasonable. Simple enough?
It's funny that you have apparently pegged me into some hole you dislike, because you know far less about me that we know about the bombers activities in the hour being discussed and have already made numerous quick false assumptions, but that's your prerogative.
I understand the fourth amendment, it has been widely interpreted by many. You seem to believe that anyone with a different interpretation from yours must be a brain dead idiot that needs a spanking. I simply feel that anyone that wants to freely give up the rights that many paid dearly to secure should instead move to somewhere that already governs the way they would like. They do exist, and I meant it about Australia, it seems great but it's not the USA.
edit: please don't take that as 'if you don't like it then get out!', it is a reasonable idea for those unhappy with the way the current system is working out, especially given the difficulty of changing it.
I take your argument to the logical conclusion, which is that if you think dangerous criminals in the area makes random searches legal, then you think the police may enter your home at any time, you have said nothing to dispute that, just called it dumb and BS. If one murderer is dangerous and worthy or house to house search, is another somehow not? Please explain and cite where the law draws the line.
Please attempt to make a rational argument and not a third grade name calling session. I made no flights from logic that I can see and freely stated I was commenting based on the 'facts' in the description, and did not resort to name calling.
Recall what one of the smartest founding fathers famously said (and quadrophonic kindly reminded me of) "Those that would sacrifice essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin

LOL The dude is spanking the girl's butt in the shower. Seriously, this is softcore porn LOL LOL

The dog is like: "Stop it!! Stop!!! You guys are nasty!!! This is torture!!! ahhh!!" LOL

And spanked.