Huckabee is such a shill.

His morals are a weathervane in a Wizard of Oz scene.

Procreation has nothing to do with marriage; if it did, old flaccid pricks would not be allowed to marry young nubile airheads.

This is just another example of the "haves" (those who have the right to marry) prohibiting the "have nots" (those who don't have the right) from being equal.

It's petty and snobbish and crass.

Huckabee is a craven little man, as are most people like him.

"Black person preferring or favoring another Black person because of race: supportive

White person preferring or favoring another White person because of race: racist"

Except McCain/Palin followers are not saying "we like McCain because he's white" they are saying "We hate Obama because he's black/muslim"

SOME of them DO hate him for that reason, but I'll wager many more on the left hate McCain because he's a veteran and old and SOME on the left hate Sarah Palin because she's a hunter and female.

Many more don't trust Obama because of his dubious associations, his snobbish hubris, his stumbling speeches, his racist reverend and church, his bitter wife, his schemes to raise taxes across the board, his anti-gun stance, his foreign policy inexperience.

My guess is, as this election cycle winds down, lefties will accuse anyone who votes against Obama of being 'a racist'. They ALWAYS reduce everything to race; they're obsessed with it.

I called you a Douchebag once before QM, I stand by that today.

Then this will makes two times I laughed at what has been a clichéd groupthink insult since '06.

Well, first of all, I'd like to thank my mother, my dad, my wife, who's been supportive in this venture, my friends, all the fans

THANK YOU FOLKS! This congratulatory celebration overwhelms my humble persona. I'm speechless.

Well, no, not really, rather the opposite. Let's bring out the champagne, the coke, the balloons and the clowns! It's a gold-star party and the snobbish elitist diamonds are not invited! We won't let them drop no eaves on our plans to take over the Sift!

Seriously - I've now joined the fantastic crowd of thegrimsleeper, spoco2, evil_disco_man, yoghurt, Raigen, Leakroth, berticus, Lurch, Zeph, Fletch, NordlichReiter, Tofumar, Thylan, Bakalex, doogle, lavoll... and the list goes on. I mean, there was talk of the Sift going in the wrong direction a while back, but with the recent developments I don't think there are many left to assert that anymore. It's great to see the Sift in its current spectacular awesomeness still bolstering the numbers of great personalities and entertainment-providers, and I'm quite proud to be a part of that crowd. Thank you everyone for being yourselves (=great people), it's what drew me in.

In reply to this comment by EDD:
Your snobbish attitude disgusts me, LittleRed: this feeling trumped over my surprise when I just found out you're a female. I also have a feeling that you deliberately reserved those thinly (at best) veiled insults for the last paragraph-again. This trait of yours is despicable.

I must say I have hell of a lot more respect for a lady who turned to her mate for assistance in a discussion that made her uncomfortable for good reasons than for one who basically continuously trolls a web site with her snide comments and attacks a fellow female for showing.. what, feminine traits in an internet conversation? Her vulnerability? How does that concern/offend you, exactly?

To be fair I am completely at a loss as to why you're being this aggressive (feminism?) when discussing similar topics. I'd like to know why. And yes, I'm not hiding my dislike towards the way you've behaved on this site.

I am not a snob; I am a woman. I am strong and I speak my mind. People who promote the "women are weak! Rescue them!" stereotype disgust me. I also realize that I am a bitch. I am generally told so on a weekly basis. I'd rather be a bitch than allow someone to walk all over me, or have a man speak for me.

I understand my opinion means a lot less to people [less than if I were polite] because I'm a bitch. I get it. But I would respect a bitch over someone who won't even address a stranger to say "Hey, this makes me uncomfortable," and sends her boyfriend in to mess things up.

If comments from guys on the internet offend you, you have a problem. If you can't even say to the offender "Hey, I don't really appreciate being hit on; would you mind not doing that again?" for fear of not being taken seriously, you need some counseling in self-worth. How to stand up for yourself. If you have a history of doing this kind of thing, even more so. If you send your internet boyfriend in to "clean up the mess" only to not back him up when he starts a shit storm, that's a problem. If you think the original comment is sexual harassment, you have a serious problem.

It's obvious to even a blind person that the two are dating. They spread their stickily sweet lovey-dovey relationship on every comment written, every blog post, even their profile. Maybe internet relationships just have to communicate their attachment to everyone in fear the next internet girl or guy will steal their partner away? I don't understand the meaning behind that, and I do find it curious that the only two couples on here who aren't content with making the occasional comfortable relationship comment (i.e. Issykitty and DFT OR laura and DonJuan, OR Dag and Persephone) are long-distance, on another continent couples. Ugh. That aside, it's obvious they're dating. Anyone who makes a comment like "Maybe we should talk" is OBVIOUSLY not intending that as a pick-up line, especially with a militant boyfriend around the corner.

If you want to label me as a feminist, I will proudly accept that label. However, unlike some, I don't want to give a bad name to feminists for my views. By that, I mean I don't speak for anyone else or females in general when I say what I do. I think it's disgusting that she's running to someone else to do her dirty work, and even blames that on the fact that she's female and has had less-than-perfect interactions with men in the past. Do I scorn her for showing "feminine" traits in this situation? If you want to consider those "feminine traits," be my guest. I see weakness and a complete lack of self-respect, or self-confidence. She purports to be extremely confident in her relationship, to the point that she allows her boyfriend, as long as he's on another continent, to watch porn. [Considering that's the way their relationship is, fine. But when her views on porn in anything other than a long-distance relationship are the same or similar to the ones thepinky and I were trying to share, she shouldn't have acted so self-righteous.] Yet at the same time, she's not comfortable enough to have a strange guy make a perfectly innocent, somewhat flirtatious comment, and neither is her boyfriend.

In addition, I do not "continuously troll a website with [my] snide comments." Sure, I may contribute a snide comment on occasion - the only two I can think of outside this discussion are the comment to LadyDeath about how she should apologize for quoting thepinky on the porn thread, and to K0MMIE when he attacked me in his post on the same topic. No, I may not contribute much video-wise. As I've said before, I joined for the discussion; I'm not a vote whore. In topics that are not emotionally charged or sexist, my comments are well-thought-out and generally appreciated. I have several comments from the first few months I joined that, if the comment voting system had been in place, I would have a star by now. Sure, maybe that doesn't negate the fact that what I have said recently, some people may consider out of line. Then again, I don't have to answer to anyone but myself.

Your snobbish attitude disgusts me, LittleRed: this feeling trumped over my surprise when I just found out you're a female. I also have a feeling that you deliberately reserved those thinly (at best) veiled insults for the last paragraph-again. This trait of yours is despicable.

I must say I have hell of a lot more respect for a lady who turned to her mate for assistance in a discussion that made her uncomfortable for good reasons than for one who basically continuously trolls a web site with her snide comments and attacks a fellow female for showing.. what, feminine traits in an internet conversation? Her vulnerability? How does that concern/offend you, exactly?

To be fair I am completely at a loss as to why you're being this aggressive (feminism?) when discussing similar topics. I'd like to know why. And yes, I'm not hiding my dislike towards the way you've behaved on this site.

I'm currently typing this on a Macbook, and I love it more than any PC I've ever used; however, I try not to be snobbish about a box of circuitry that gives me my e-mail and porn. Any operating system that will satisfy my cravings is alright with me.

The McCain's (Well, his wife at least) are very wealthy, how again is it, he plans on helping the "Everyman"

I thought he wasn't the worst candidate early on, but now I think its Bush wear a face mask...

http://www.king-george.biz/wst_page5.html

He's a signitory of PNAC, so does this explain the lock step approach? and opinions on this.

As far as his wife not wanting to disclose her finacials, I dont know what the rule are for US tax return and privacy but it may seem elitist or snobbish to refuse when everyone else shows. Plus there is the problem of is she hiding someting for mr. mccain?

anyways...

I agree and disagree, I mean the violin was represented as living breathing thing that thrived when it passed from one to the other. It getting simply sold off to some snobbish collector would have been just as worse.

hmm that's interesting, i am really not advocating strong arm admins, not even sure what you mean there... glad to clear that up for you

but i do advocate being snobbish about what's on here, trying to encourage the more colourful and interesting things, because too much generalisation and lolcat leads to grey soup. i can go to youtube for that.