At what point do we just get to call this softcore porn? The cleavage shot, the obvious sexual innuendos, the god-damned popsicle for f#%s sake. Japanese word of the day? Please. If there's any point to this video other than to rack up views (pun kinda intended) and turn people on I'll eat a dildo.

Scarlet-crowned harlot eh? I bet I could get partially through her eye of the needle.. she'd not even feel it...
>> ^hpqp:

>> ^AdrianBlack:
It's ok to reference camel toes if you're female...and a ginger bitch. >> ^Fletch:
Oh great... the inevitable "cute" and base sexual references whenever a video contains an attractive female. You hear her voice and only just kinda see her, yet that's all it takes to massage the man muscle for some of you. And it's not even about her, people. It's about the camel. Yes, the camel. How do you think he feels, his moment in the spotlight waylayed by sophmoric sexual innuendo and ancient memes? To risk injury by running in a manner that is very likely hazardous to camels and other even-toed ungulates just to entertain us, and then see his risk rendered moot by such off-topic and immature comments must be disheartening, to say the least.
After all, he pwn'd that soulless, ginger bitch.


"And again I say unto you, It is easier for a spastic camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a soulless scarlet-crowned harlot to enter into the kingdom of God." Matthew 19:24

It's ok to reference camel toes if you're female...and a ginger bitch. >> ^Fletch:

Oh great... the inevitable "cute" and base sexual references whenever a video contains an attractive female. You hear her voice and only just kinda see her, yet that's all it takes to massage the man muscle for some of you. And it's not even about her, people. It's about the camel. Yes, the camel. How do you think he feels, his moment in the spotlight waylayed by sophmoric sexual innuendo and ancient memes? To risk injury by running in a manner that is very likely hazardous to camels and other even-toed ungulates just to entertain us, and then see his risk rendered moot by such off-topic and immature comments must be disheartening, to say the least.
After all, he pwn'd that soulless, ginger bitch.

Oh great... the inevitable "cute" and base sexual references whenever a video contains an attractive female. You hear her voice and only just kinda see her, yet that's all it takes to massage the man muscle for some of you. And it's not even about her, people. It's about the camel. Yes, the camel. How do you think he feels, his moment in the spotlight waylayed by sophmoric sexual innuendo and ancient memes? To risk injury by running in a manner that is very likely hazardous to camels and other even-toed ungulates just to entertain us, and then see his risk rendered moot by such off-topic and immature comments must be disheartening, to say the least.

After all, he pwn'd that soulless, ginger bitch.






I refuse to use the "sarcasm" button.

Noted: sexual innuendo leads to upvotes.

In reply to this comment by Payback:
>> ^SlipperyPete:

Now everyone knows the secret to Gretchen's box.


Only upvoted due to your name.

Such fertile ground for sexual innuendo...

>> ^Opus_Moderandi:

Nope. No sexual innuendo at all.


Damn, you beat me to it...

( especially 0:42-1:00, which makes "this is the part where the kids love it" really creepy)

Nope. No sexual innuendo at all.

Is this just a long, drawn out, video? Pocketing a sexual innuendo engineering piece?

/innuendo (Not a documentary on Italian Suppositories. Thanks Colin or Colon; which is it?)

He always does a great job of making women uncomfortable by hitting on them with bits of sexual innuendo here and there. He's my favorite.

Hehehe. Thanks, Captain Obvious. Your superpowers went to good use here.
>> ^spawnflagger:

>> ^gwiz665:
We're talking about drinking now?

So let me break it down...
a) In most states in USA, the drinking age is 21 (it used to be 18 in some states). Meaning if you are under 21, then it is illegal to consume alcoholic beverages.
b) champagne is an alcoholic beverage
c) Hayden Panettiere was born August 21, 1989, according to IMDB.
d) When someone mentions "Spitting or Swallowing", chances are they are talking about fellatio, and the eventual destination of the ejaculate - will the person performing the act spit it out, or swallow it.
e) Hayden Panettiere is an attractive female actress, and an object of sexual desire to many men.
f) champagne as featured in this video, is a metaphor for ejaculating on miss Panettiere's face and chest.
g) jimnms commented "WTF, she didn't even swallow."
h) because it is obvious that jimnms was making a sexual reference, the faux-naivety expressed in my response is humorous, because I nonchalantly answered logically with a valid reason (that she didn't want to break the law), while completely bypassing the sexual innuendo.
i) not everyone recognizes this type of humor, so they would assume that I am naive, conservative, or mentally handicapped in some way. That is a risk I was willing to take when posting the comment.

>> ^gwiz665:

We're talking about drinking now?


So let me break it down...

a) In most states in USA, the drinking age is 21 (it used to be 18 in some states). Meaning if you are under 21, then it is illegal to consume alcoholic beverages.
b) champagne is an alcoholic beverage
c) Hayden Panettiere was born August 21, 1989, according to IMDB.
d) When someone mentions "Spitting or Swallowing", chances are they are talking about fellatio, and the eventual destination of the ejaculate - will the person performing the act spit it out, or swallow it.
e) Hayden Panettiere is an attractive female actress, and an object of sexual desire to many men.
f) champagne as featured in this video, is a metaphor for ejaculating on miss Panettiere's face and chest.
g) jimnms commented "WTF, she didn't even swallow."
h) because it is obvious that jimnms was making a sexual reference, the faux-naivety expressed in my response is humorous, because I nonchalantly answered logically with a valid reason (that she didn't want to break the law), while completely bypassing the sexual innuendo.
i) not everyone recognizes this type of humor, so they would assume that I am naive, conservative, or mentally handicapped in some way. That is a risk I was willing to take when posting the comment.

"Scared the shit out of"

There was never an indication about this to me while I was there. She said, after the others had left and we were heading to bed, "You need to watch it with that" that being the grabbing, I replied "Yeah, yeah" in a shrugging-it-off kind of way. I should have seen that sign and acted accordingly, but I didn't. I was ignorant, but never malicious.

If she had said it in plain english, while we were just the two of us in the room "Please, I really think you made us uncomfortable with that groping and things you said like [x][y][z]" I would have apologized then too.

If I were far more relentless than I remember, then obviously I don't remember it. I continued talking like we had talked on messenger and on videosift too, like with ac it was probably spiraling out of control, but I didn't see it at the time, and I was not alone in that.

"I think from VS alone we know that he doesn't care for being censored, and he does and says what he wants when he wants. Mix this in with alcohol and heat..."

I do indeed not care for being censored, especially on videosift. In real life I am quite a bit more amicable though, and while we did discuss what should and shouldn't be said to a child, I never said anything to any of her kids that were inappropriate and anywhere near what people have been telling me I said.

I say what I want a lot of the times, but to suggest that I "do what I want" has some nasty innuendo as well, which I certainly do not care for. My wrongdoings in Texas are what I did to Ivy, and to me at the time it did not seem as such a huge deal. I've apologized for that quite a few times already, and I'm still sorry for that.

"He's obviously never going to admit that he used sexual innuendo around her children, so that's her word against his, and he's clever enough to know that if he lays it bare he can get away with bullshitting the rest of it, i'm sure."

I am not a liar. I may have very different boundaries, which means I've stepped on a lot of toes. My swearing is just how I talk, it's not that I deliberately swear to be a jerk to people. I just don't think swearing is or should be a big deal at all. It obviously is much more of a deal to some people than others, and I'm sorry I was being insensitive to that.

I'm not trying to bullshit my way out of this, if I did say anything that her kids overheard then I was not aware. I can imagine the scenario where me and bea has talked about something like it, and one of them could have run into the room. At that point we've stopped talking like that. If anyone knows me here, and a lot of people do, it's that I'm not a liar, I don't want to distort the truth. Hell, that's what my whole crusade against religion has been about.

I feel sorry for bea too. She was nothing but nice to me while I was in Texas and I did my best to only be nice to the people there as well. She doesn't deserve this, but neither do I. To come out with a diatribe like the one above is not in any way nice, proper or appropriate and that's the only reason I've laid things out as I remember them. You talk to me about appropriateness and come out with such dire accusations and conclusions? Appalling.

I'm not leaving anything deliberately out, I am not distorting the truth. My comments to AC were well into the realm of crazy innuendo, because that's what we had already done for a long time. I saw it as something completely beside her relationship, that's why I continued. This was obviously my mistake, not hers. The same thing with bea - we talked a lot of trash in the lounge and it just poured over into real life conversations as well. We are both to blame for that.

I'm not a bad person. I can be very oblivious, god yes, but I am certainly not malicious and I hope none of you judge me as such.

And with that, I'm moving away from this subject. I don't think I will be as active on VS as I've been, but I'll still be around, because I still have a lot of friends here and if I ever do leave videosift, I would have it be a a much less bitter note than this.

Oh fucking hell, enough about bea and drawing her name through the mud like this. You people sometimes, jesus!

Gwiz you have laid it all out bare for everyone to see, in doing so you have told your side. Let me just say that bea's message to me was just a very good excuse to stop from having to converse with you, i'd had enough a couple of months previous, hence why I rarely ever talked to you on MSN anymore and you had to keep PMing me to get me to sign in. I felt sorry for you and guilty for the way i'd potentially made you think things that weren't true, but you became a headdache. I'm sorry I wasn't straight up with you, but I don't like being mean.

What I said to you was true, it felt like you had no respect for my relationship, because you continued to act the same way if not worse when I told you about it. Still i'm to blame for allowing it to be like that, and I happily take that on my shoulders.

This is the e mail I just sent to dag, as I can't be bothered to write it all out again, but I think people are missing some very vital points.


Hey dag,

After reading through the rest of gwiz' comments and other peoples in that thread, i'd like to say firstly, i'm sorry that it has caused so much shit to go down. But mainly i'm sorry for bea.

Now gwiz has been justified in his actions. What he's done is admit everything he can remember, been as honest as possible. I can't deny that everything he has said is true, but only from his point. He was far more relentless than he says he was, and far more inappropriate. He never stopped pestering me to let him come here, it became extremely uncomfortable. I wont make the points about his innuendo, cos I let it happen in the beginning so maybe gave him mixed signals. But lets just say there are limits and he crossed the line and some with the sheer constance of it all.

And as for bea. It's absolutely amazing to me that he can admit to swearing around her kids and grabbing a married womans boobs and slapping her ass, and this not be a huge indication of how he was presenting himself there. He's obviously never going to admit that he used sexual innuendo around her children, so that's her word against his, and he's clever enough to know that if he lays it bare he can get away with bullshitting the rest of it, i'm sure. I think from VS alone we know that he doesn't care for being censored, and he does and says what he wants when he wants. Mix this in with alcohol and heat...

Now bea is looking like some psycho who has made things up. Why would she do that? She would never have said any of this in public if it hadn't have been drawn out like this. She had no friendship with me at this point, she didn't need to warn me about anything. She felt she had to because he scared the shit out of her with his behaviour there. No other reason for it. But he can't see it and now her name is being dragged through the mud.

I don't know how to address these points, i'm not going back again. But I think someone needs to back her up. And point out that clearly his behaviour in general is not ok. Ivy has her back but she wants no more to do with it. Now they will never be able to go back because of how it all now looks. I feel pretty sick.

Anyway dag, thank you for dealing with it all, i'm sorry it's turned out this way. I'm sorry people can't read between the lines and that he is so deep in his denial about himself that he can even argue any of this and have people feel sorry for him. But c'est la vie, right.

Take it easy chief!

Rae

Obviously I have come back to say this, but i'm disgusted with how bea is being persecuted. But yeah, to hell with it, i'm still gone and you guys are still here. Hope this is all laid to rest soon. And by all means discard when you're done with it

P.S Leave rasch out of it too. As far as he's concerned, he has backed us up with all the information presented to him. That is what a man with the courage of his convictions should do