shinyblurry, the flaw in your thinking is that somehow this Bible is a perfect work and completely true word of God, and yet there are so many different versions. You can't even come close to agreeing on the basic concept of what is God. How is your Trinity correct, but the Catholic church is wrong, and the apostles are wrong, but somehow YOU are correct.

God spoke to me and told me that when Jesus, God (the old cranky Jewish one), and the Holy Spirit get together, they (like Voltron) form a being know as Thor. It is true and indisputable. There is no way you or the New Testament can dispute this revelation. You may call it the Trinity or something, but I have seen the true form and name it takes, it is know as Thor (head of Jesus, body of the spirit, mighty smiting arms of father God)

The real problem with your nonsense is that a child molester who murders old ladies and is also a serial killer... just has to say a few words and poof, he is as pure and spiritual as you are. I'm not sure how that sits well with you.

>>You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only -- James 2:24

Also, Jesus likes to contradict himself even from the same author within mere paragraphs of one another:
>>If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. -- John 5:13
>>Though I bear record of myself, yet my record is true -- John 8:14

That silly Jesus, he is like a quantum Jesus, true and untrue at the same time.

He's a serial killer.

>> ^Hybrid:

Why the ban nomination @ant?>> ^ant:
music animation ban



FRAK! I didn't mean to put ban in. Ack, how do I undo it?

Why the ban nomination @ant?>> ^ant:

music animation ban

Can't wait till they find a serial killer that actually plays video games and we become Australia.

Ah, new footage for a serial killer documentary.

Well, the Ron Paul right wingers I can't really explain. They are pro death for unborn babies and the uninsured, but pro-life for convicted serial killers.

A better number of right wingers though are pro-life for unborn babies, and pro-death for serial killers. That at least seems self consistent and not inherently and obviously evil or wrong.

You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Siskel & Ebert Review 'Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer'. Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.

You see this? This is how serial killers are cultivated in our society. Nice going.

>> ^Yogi:

That said, I would have no problem with someone like Jeffrey Dahmer being put to death. Caught red-handed and guilty of unspeakable horror and cruelty... fry him up.

Oh yeah I'm not against the death penalty...there's people out there that do unspeakable things and deserve to die absolutely. However this blanket idea of capitol punishment I don't want my name to. Kill someone like the asshole that attacked our Army Base or a serial killer or something than yeah I'll pull the trigger myself.
But all this killing people because we have some evidence they may have killed someone obviously isn't fucking working. And I say that as the son of a murdered woman who's killer was never caught.


Exactly. The thing that is so frightening about this guy is that he does not acknowledge that the system CAN fail and that an error can cause an innocent person their life. The arrogance he displays by trying to imply that Texas doesn't make mistakes because they are so "thoughtful" about the process... please. In a state which is constantly trying to teach creationism, ban books, and prides itself on being uneducated... yeah, I want nothing of that "thoughtfulness" when a life is at stake.

That said, I would have no problem with someone like Jeffrey Dahmer being put to death. Caught red-handed and guilty of unspeakable horror and cruelty... fry him up.



Oh yeah I'm not against the death penalty...there's people out there that do unspeakable things and deserve to die absolutely. However this blanket idea of capitol punishment I don't want my name to. Kill someone like the asshole that attacked our Army Base or a serial killer or something than yeah I'll pull the trigger myself.

But all this killing people because we have some evidence they may have killed someone obviously isn't fucking working. And I say that as the son of a murdered woman who's killer was never caught.

Oh, I think he understood damned well. He just doesn't have a problem if one of the innocent darkies gets executed on his watch. I'm actually not against the death penalty in theory. Even the way he (quite panderingly so) states it is fairly simple: I don't have a problem with a bat-shit crazy serial killer rapist being put to death.

The problem is that the actual enforcement of the death penalty is just racist. White criminals and black criminals don't get the same sentences for the same crimes.


Of course, there is the issue of innocent people being put to death too and I definitely have a problem with a death-penalty case which is nebulous. Say something there they don't have direct evidence and the links to the criminal are circumstantial.

That said, I would have no problem with someone like Jeffrey Dahmer being put to death. Caught red-handed and guilty of unspeakable horror and cruelty... fry him up.

Edit: just one source for the whole racist aspects of the way that the death penalty is handled http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-penalty-black-and-white-who-lives-who-dies-who-decides

>> ^Yogi:

Education is all I can think of when I see stuff like this. People who cheer things like that simply aren't educated.
EDIT: Also you have to be concerned with the education of Parry because he clearly didn't understand the question. The question was essentially do you lose any sleep over possibly executing innocent people? To which he replied that if you commit a heinous crime you should be put to death. I understand in this country with our sound-bite media that a candidate cannot be heard to utter something that could be perceived to go against their supporters wishes. However I really wish in a public debate we had instead of Brian Williams a man who knows exactly what's going on and allows it we had someone like David Mitchell because there is no way he would let that go. He would've kept pressing him until he made him look like the utter retard he is.

The hypocrisy is conflating homosexuality with morality.

We could go back and forth for years over which side has the biggest hypocrites. 'Last week' it was Weiner.

It is not immoral to be gay.

Though I believe homosexuality is genetic, it's still a matter of sexuality, which requires temperance by a moral code, laws, religion, or best out of three (ha).

It is immoral to demonize the way God made you.

A serial killer could argue that since he naturally has a shrunken amygdala, a common trait among serial killers and thus the way nature made him, he shouldn't be judged for killing, at least not by the same standards as a mafia hit man.

The cartoon is about the general failings of the left when it comes to having moral standards, a byproduct of framing every argument as rich versus poor instead of right versus wrong.

next he'll put frogs in his mouth, then come the puppies, then come the little girls. this is how serial killers begin, folks!

>> ^viewer_999:
Teach 'em to find pleasure in hurting animals young; gets a jump on the serial killer nurturing process. He likes you!

I'd recommend to you Hemingway's Islands in the Stream, particularly Bimini, Chapter IX.