her woo-woo?

Dag, the proper terminology is
Vah-Jay-Jay

(the more you know....!)


In reply to this comment by dag:
^ I concur with this. And before you bring up my discarding of the nude magician ages ago - I would like to say that I didn't do it because of the nudity - but because she pulled a hanky out of her woowoo.

And I recanted.

considering I just listened to the original version of that song today with my kid, your version had me laughing out loud. funny !

Qruel

In reply to this comment by persephone:
Do ya pubes hang low, do they tumble too and fro, can you tie em in a knot, can you tie em in a bow?

Would make interesting beachwear alternatives. You could pull it up through the back and around the waist- a bushy thong!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody' to 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody, merkin' - edited by calvados

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Pubic Hair Bizarre' to 'Pubic Hair, Bizarre, fashion, spoof, parody' - edited by joedirt

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Definitely not porn - it passes the wood test with me. No wood is all good.

But seriously, is he trying to say that they grew their pubic hair to those lengths? Some looked to be a bout 4 feet. Surely they were extensions?

The local New Orleans Academy of Fine Art maintains the following philosophy: if you can master the human figure, you can paint anything you want. At the other end of the spectrum, the avant-garde has embraced porn in art. ARTNEWS has already had two issues devoted to the subject in the last three years.

As Attorney General, John Ashcroft found it necessary to hide Liberty’s (the statue) exposed boob behind a blue curtain when he addressed the press. An art teacher in Texas lost her job because a kid saw a nude statue and complained.

I did sit through a documentary about the Motion Picture Association of America’s (MPAA) rating system, “ This Film Has Not Been Rated Yet.” It did point out that in the US we’re harsher on sex in films than violence. In Europe it is the opposite. There were interviews with directors who had to fight NC-17 ratings. Non-missionary, pubic hair and weird sex seemed to put a film in NC-17 territory. Sometimes the amount of seconds made a difference.

And now thanks to John Cameron Mitchell (Hedwig and the Angry Inch) there is “Shortbus.” It’s an art film with real sex scenes. Three guys do for the “The Star Bangle Banner” what “American Pie” did for apple pie. There are several plotlines involving relationships and the main characters go to a club called Shortbus.

Anyway, I’m torn on the whole issue. I’m tired of folks making such a big deal of nudity. But at the same time I don’t need to see every bodily function up close and personal. I’ll vote as needed.