search results matching tag: powerful stuff

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.003 seconds

    Videos (11)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (5)     Comments (53)   

USAF Veteran taking a stand against NFL

Zawash (Member Profile)

Muhammad Ali's biggest fights were outside the ring -Vox

Muhammad Ali in Candid Camera Show

John Oliver: Primaries and Caucuses

ChaosEngine says...

@newtboy, one thing I think you're missing is that a lot of the people arguing to vote Hillary are actually Bernie supporters.

@bareboards2 actually posted this video
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Bernies-New-Ad-This-is-powerful-stuff-for-the-Heartland

@dag is also a Bernie supporter.

John Oliver: Primaries and Caucuses

enoch (Member Profile)

siftbot says...

Congratulations! Your comment on Bernie's New Ad. This is powerful stuff for the Heartland has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Ant-Man – Official Trailer

lucky760 says...

Powerful stuff.


Can I have a hug?

enoch said:

people were whining the same song with guardians of the galaxy.
it's too obscure they cried.
nobody knows the characters they bemoaned.
why can't they make a movie i want to see?
why is marvel doing this to me?????
this movie is going to suck balls!!

holy crap! this movie is awesome!

and then the earth lost a bit in its rotation as the nerd horde back-pedaled in synchronicity.

seems a large chunk of the problem is that most of the nay-sayers had never read the book.
imagine that...
formulating an opinion based on never having read the source material.

out of all the avengers,ant-man has the most complex and nuanced...
and most human.i wish this movie was about hank pym but it appears they are using the timeline from "the irredeemable ant-man" graphic novel.which is cool...antman is kind of a dick in the beginning.

that being said,
where is my goddamn deadpool movie!!?

McDonald's Worker Confronts Company Prez Over Fair Wages

cluhlenbrauck says...

This video doesn't really tell the whole story. maybe shes not even full time. I worked at mcd as a teen and they gave raises every year. yeah only about 0.05 cents.
this whole fight the power stuff gets out of hand.

Chris Hedges and Michael Moore on "Corporate Coup d’État"

PalmliX (Member Profile)

longde (Member Profile)

Hubbard's Grt-Grandson Poetically Exposes Man Behind Myth

Lawrence Lessig - Authors@Google

God does exist. Testimony from an ex-atheist:

shinyblurry says...

Why? It makes logical sense. If there wasn't always something there, that means at some point there was nothing there. So without anything eternal you have to believe that something came from nothing. Then you have the chain of casuality..in which every link of the chain you have to ask, how did that get there then? Without something eternal you must do this infinitely. An eternal first cause is the only choice that makes logical sense..and going back to the earlier discussion, it also explains why the Universe appears designed even to dawkins..because it is!

>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^shinyblurry:
Something eternal always was, by definition it didn't "get there". It always was there. Something can't come from nothing. Either there was always something, or there couldn't be anything. This points to an Uncasued Cause..ie, an eternal God. Dawkins theory, which is a ridiculous explanation for the Universe appearing designed, just complicates his position expodentially, because then he has to explain infinite Universes instead of just one. Either way, its an infinite chain of causality without a Creator.
>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^shinyblurry:
Even dawkins admitted that the Universe appeared to be designed. His explanation? In the God delusion he explains this by saying that perhaps there are infinite Univeses and we just happen to be in the one that appears designed. Pretty powerful stuff. He also doesn't resolve how infinite Universes got there either.

You didn't resolve how God got there either. You just said he was eternal and you were happy to leave it at that. So why call Dawkins out for doing the same thing? And why should I believe you over him?
(Let's no forget to mention the fact that his idea was a suggestion and yours is what you're basing your whole life around.)

(whistles)


OK, I realize now that you're having ten conversations but this is an important concept to try and grasp: there isn't even a word for how much it complicates things when you bring an eternal god to the table. Exponential doesn't even begin to cover it. For you, I think it appears simple, because you're not going to question the existence of your god. But both explanations appear equally absurd to me. The only difference is that one is grounded in science, and the other in superstition.




Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon