Wow... thats powerful stuff.

Your video, Powering Stuff when there's a Power Outage, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 32 Badge!

Muhammad Ali refuses to go to Vietnam. Powerful stuff has been added as a related post - related requested by bareboards2 on that post.

Muhammad Ali refuses to go to Vietnam. Powerful stuff has been added as a related post - related requested by bareboards2 on that post.

@newtboy, one thing I think you're missing is that a lot of the people arguing to vote Hillary are actually Bernie supporters.

@bareboards2 actually posted this video
*related=http://videosift.com/video/Bernies-New-Ad-This-is-powerful-stuff-for-the-Heartland

@dag is also a Bernie supporter.

Bernie's New Ad. This is powerful stuff for the Heartland has been added as a related post - related requested by ChaosEngine.

Congratulations! Your comment on Bernie's New Ad. This is powerful stuff for the Heartland has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Powerful stuff.


Can I have a hug?

This video doesn't really tell the whole story. maybe shes not even full time. I worked at mcd as a teen and they gave raises every year. yeah only about 0.05 cents.
this whole fight the power stuff gets out of hand.

*length=13:34

Hedges' point about the Coup d'État can be found in part three of the original panel discussion. It's powerful stuff, might be worth a submission of its own.

Thanks so much man! Powerful stuff from Louis as usual. Gonna post it now! Hope I do it right lol.>> ^alien_concept:

Here you go, hope it's not blocked or some stupid shit like that! It's missing literally the first few seconds
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xs0bwq_extreme-love-autism_shortfilms

Fixed it.

Had to do a tubechop to get the specific bit. Powerful stuff.


In reply to this comment by longde:
*dead, but there's a copy on youtuble

Wow. "Don't believe everything you read, but believe everything you say" gave me a chill, powerful stuff.

This is long, but don't let it dissuade you. This is powerful stuff.

Why? It makes logical sense. If there wasn't always something there, that means at some point there was nothing there. So without anything eternal you have to believe that something came from nothing. Then you have the chain of casuality..in which every link of the chain you have to ask, how did that get there then? Without something eternal you must do this infinitely. An eternal first cause is the only choice that makes logical sense..and going back to the earlier discussion, it also explains why the Universe appears designed even to dawkins..because it is!

>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^shinyblurry:
Something eternal always was, by definition it didn't "get there". It always was there. Something can't come from nothing. Either there was always something, or there couldn't be anything. This points to an Uncasued Cause..ie, an eternal God. Dawkins theory, which is a ridiculous explanation for the Universe appearing designed, just complicates his position expodentially, because then he has to explain infinite Universes instead of just one. Either way, its an infinite chain of causality without a Creator.
>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^Ryjkyj:
>> ^shinyblurry:
Even dawkins admitted that the Universe appeared to be designed. His explanation? In the God delusion he explains this by saying that perhaps there are infinite Univeses and we just happen to be in the one that appears designed. Pretty powerful stuff. He also doesn't resolve how infinite Universes got there either.

You didn't resolve how God got there either. You just said he was eternal and you were happy to leave it at that. So why call Dawkins out for doing the same thing? And why should I believe you over him?
(Let's no forget to mention the fact that his idea was a suggestion and yours is what you're basing your whole life around.)

(whistles)


OK, I realize now that you're having ten conversations but this is an important concept to try and grasp: there isn't even a word for how much it complicates things when you bring an eternal god to the table. Exponential doesn't even begin to cover it. For you, I think it appears simple, because you're not going to question the existence of your god. But both explanations appear equally absurd to me. The only difference is that one is grounded in science, and the other in superstition.