As an avid consumer of increasingly obscure pornography, sometimes I'm surprised to learn that in the wider community many people haven't even considered the erotic possibilities of, for example, simulated alien impregnation.

Given you are a proponent of corrective rape, child pornography, genocide, mass murder, and political assassination, what makes you better? Not having millions of followers?

Oh God... he references child pornography for a joke, and the audience laughs at it because they've all watched child porn. As have I, and anyone who recognizes the 'psycho ex' bit

PS: Art cannot discriminate or objectify anyone. People do that. Someone runs over someone with a car, is it the cars fault? Someone gets stabbed, do you ban knives? Someone publishes a sexual fantasy, should we ban all books? Feminists embrace marxism for this reason.

I grew up watching all manner of pornography. Larry Flint is one of my personal heroes. Yet I never once tried to use a woman like some kind of fleshlight. Although I noticed boys all around me without access to pornography poaching school-girls with lies and deceit and then breaking their hearts by never calling them back, or worse, leaving them with child and no support. THAT is what objectifying someone is, if you think TV and comic books is what causes these monkey-men to behave this way, that a little bit of censorship is going to transform them into empathetic intellectuals, I just want to let you know you're in for some disappointment.

Maybe you have selective hearing? Try starting the video at 0:29 where the narrator says:

A lonely confused young man gets addicted to pornography...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'mormons, lds, maturbation, battlefield' to 'mormons, lds, masturbation, battlefield, pornography addiction, byu idaho' - edited by xxovercastxx

This is clearly not snuff.

"Please do not post pornography or "snuff" films (which we define as the explicit depiction of loss of human life displayed for entertainment).

Note: The presence of human fatality is acceptable and not considered "snuff" if presented as a limited portion of a lengthy educational, informative news report or documentary. Our definition of "snuff" does include but is not exclusive to any short clip in which a human fatality occurs whether or not any victims are actually visible on camera."

Here are the sift guidelines when it comes to "snuff"

Please do not post pornography or "snuff" films (which we define as the explicit depiction of loss of human life displayed for entertainment).

Note: The presence of human fatality is acceptable and not considered "snuff" if presented as a limited, incidental portion of a lengthy educational, informative news report or documentary that encompasses a much broader narrative. Our definition of "snuff" does include but is not exclusive to any short clip in which a human fatality occurs whether or not any victims are actually visible on camera.
http://videosift.com/faq#posting_guidelines

To remove the video just put *kill or *discard in the comments and it will be removed.

Translation: The target audience for this sandwich are likely to enjoy pussy and beef between hard-drinking, drug abuse, and pornography.

By the way, can I co-star in a remake of Human Centipede with these two and be the center person??...but instead of being fed food, a drip of methamphetamine and morphine (real junk on the set).

Pornography comes from the greek pornē, for prostitute. So, pornocracy might actually be a pretty good description of modern political culture.

Just FYI VideoSifts definition of what snuff is has nothing to do with the dictionaries definition. What is and isn't snuff is an argument that has gone on a VS since the beginning of time itself I believe this video could be considered snuff by past videos that have been discarded as snuff. I however think it's a poor rule which is to difficult to define properly and will always cause debate.

Please do not post pornography or "snuff" films (which we define as the explicit depiction of loss of human life displayed for entertainment).

Note: The presence of human fatality is acceptable and not considered "snuff" if presented as a limited, incidental portion of a lengthy educational, informative news report or documentary that encompasses a much broader narrative. Our definition of "snuff" does include but is not exclusive to any short clip in which a human fatality occurs whether or not any victims are actually visible on camera.

nice 1 minute intro, i just watched part 2 which is a 30 minute exploration of pornography surfing with the bus/train commuter in mind

Finally, a little perspective. I feel like CNN was really just trying to emphasize that this isn't some bullshit punishment. These kids got their asses handed to them. They're fucked. I think this was in direct response to the understandable concerns that they wouldn't be.

This brings up a bigger question, which is "why don't more of these cases end this way?" My argument would be because the legal consequence of sexually related crime is too severe. It often has the effect of making the judge or jury uncomfortable levying that punishment in light of the specific facts of the case, and thus acquit the rapists to avoid destroying their life completely. It even probably dissuades many victims from levying accusations in the first place. If there were more graded punishments as there are in many other developed nations, we might find charges and convictions more common.

The registered sex offender thing is just one example. I remember that one case of a girl getting charged with distributing child pornography for sexting her boyfriend. Now she has to tell her neighbors she's a sex offender. It's all about politics, not justice.

What kind of pornography does that kid read to write that?