Country's
Motto: Faith, Unity, Discipline

Last 5 empires to rule :British, Sikh, Durrani, Mughal, and Mongol.

By 2030 it is expected to overtake Indonesia as the largest Muslim country in the world (About 97% of the population) The majority are Sunni, with an estimated 5–20% Shi'a.

Between the dominant strain and the 5-20% of Shi'a throw-backs to the 4rth century,of the rest.... The Ahmadis (sect considered non-Muslim by virtue of a 1974 constitutional amendment, how fucking retarded and out-of-synch with 21st century sensibilities with a view to societal evolution is that,hello??),Quraniyoon..etc etc, and the rest of the religions or disciplines to be found on the planet.

It's an ancient seat of human society, rich on culture and heritage, unfortunately, Muslim religion dictates much of influence on government policies as well. Oh. They have the fucking atomic bomb, too. That's worrisome...nah, fuck it, they're not suicidal.

I have a silly question for y'all. How many 14-year-old kids do you know or have heard of in Canada ,the United States or Denmark who can fashion replacement parts for an AK-47 in a hut with a dirt floor and a home-made smelt?

The alternatives to not-so-'precise or humane air strikes involve equally as 'problematic and inhumane aspects. I can think of only one scenario where everybody wins.

UN-TEACH SHIT-THINK TO EACH NEW GENERATION. A similar fix would make North Korea a country full of humans being instead of robot putty husks, in just outside of 2 generations.

For those who don't know the "seven" is a model of Lada>> ^sepatown:

this is the google translation of the vid description:
"the driver of the "seven" decided to overtake a bus lost control and flew into oncoming under Tripod ... as a result of the accident the driver and passenger in the back seat got off lightly"
hopefully it's true regarding the two occupants.

this is the google translation of the vid description:

"the driver of the "seven" decided to overtake a bus lost control and flew into oncoming under Tripod ... as a result of the accident the driver and passenger in the back seat got off lightly"

hopefully it's true regarding the two occupants.

@star69

Mining investment: http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2011/10/23/1226174/517843-111024-b-mining.jpg

Financials: Australia is about to overtake Spain as the 12th largest economy. http://hashonomy.com/link/spain-set-to-surrender-rank-of-12th-biggest-economy-to-australia-bloomberg-557999/

"Tarnishing the reputation of femininity": O-kaaaaaaay.

Your last para sums things up. You clearly can't be bothered.

>> ^Fusionaut:

Slow drivers in the fast lane are more the most annoying types of drivers.


There is no fast lane... it's an overtaking lane.

I can't imagine anyone will be able to top this achievement, the only thing you might have left to do is overtake mint! Place your bets now

>> ^xxovercastxx:

@0:44, when they first have line of sight to each other, the truck driver has plenty of room to pull over whereas she has none. He should have let her pass then instead of pulling up to her.
But she completely lost her mind. Ok, so the truck driver is a dick... just pull to the left and let him go. What's to be gained by making a confrontation out of it?
In summary, assholes all around and I didn't benefit from seeing this.


I'm really not sure about this; she stops her car in the middle of the road at 0.52.

Let's assume that the truck is approximately the same size as the truck with the driver who also gets out to speak. Where on that street do you see a gap that the truck driver could enter (after 0:44 as you say) that would have made the road clearer than the alternative and much more mechanically simple (AND more carbon neutral, AND more obvious, AND more polite, AND etc.) than where she moved her car to at 4.30?

The only reason there is any argument or problem here is because the woman leaves her car and approaches the truck driver with abuse. If at 0.44 she had coasted her car into the same place it ended up at 4.30, she would have gotten to her destination perhaps 20 seconds slower than if the street were completely clear. The truck driver also slows down even more at the 40 metre gap with just a bin in it. He couldn't make the solution any more obvious to her. He couldn't fit in that gap but she can fit there in the same way as she does at 4.30.

In conclusion, i'd like to suggest that actually this is an example of a stupid idiot not being able to control a car properly. The guy in the truck was, in my opinion, overly generous in the amount of time he gave her to move into a sensible position, and he may or may not be a dick because it is unclear.

I see things like this happen every day on my way to university. People shouldn't be driving if they can't understand the basics and this is very basic. Next thing you know she'll be overtaking someone on a corner because like, you know, whatever, like i've got a salon appointment to get to so just, you know, like, get out of the way!

Negligence is the biggest killer, get her off the fucking road. I certainly don't want to share the roads with her, and i'm saddened (but not surprised; seen too much of this crap) that a minority found in her favour!

>> ^Fletch:

Does everyone in Russia have a dash cam? Why do they seem to be so prevalent there?


Technologically sophisticated populace + lawless, corrupt society.

>> ^Fletch:

Does everyone in Russia have a dash cam? Why do they seem to be so prevalent there?
Prolly for insurance reasons as a proof that they did not cause accidents

for the Lipton? seriously?>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

viral

what sucks is it cut out at the moment where it looked like the band was overtaking it with a live version of the chords. This clip is so classic now.

Yeah, I think that's what we're in the process of learning the hard way as well. I'm not really sure what safeguards we can put in place to prevent propaganda and prejudice from overtaking information and skeptical reasoning.

>> ^raverman:

@NetRunner totally agree...
Actually the nomination of Romney suggest that democracy might have operational limits. That a population must have a minimum level of intelligence, education, and freedom from indoctirnation so that they are capable of recognizing which candidates are representative... and which are not.
If people are too uneducated or too indoctrinatated by Fox, then you're only going through the motions

You mean the car is ONLY FOLLOWING ORDERS? Oh Nein! Where have we heard THIS before?

>> ^dahauns:

>> ^nock:
Also, this car sounds like a boyscout (travels center of the lane, never passes on the right) whereas google's car is programmed to drive more like a human would when necessary.

You do realize that it's only following german regulations (e.g. no overtaking on the right allowed)?

>> ^nock:
Also, this car sounds like a boyscout (travels center of the lane, never passes on the right) whereas google's car is programmed to drive more like a human would when necessary.


You do realize that it's only following german regulations (e.g. no overtaking on the right allowed)?

I'm pretty sure that the guy in front wasn't bumped.. it was close, but it wasn't bumped... and there definitely isn't any tailgating. The guy didn't hit the car in front, even when the car in front was breaking and accelerating seemingly at random.

I don't know how anyone could consider that the guy with the camera was driving eratically. I'm not sure i would have stopped, and if i would then it would have been on the hard shoulder. The guy behind is also probably at fault, no doubt, but i have to say at those speeds and on a motorway where you are used to things happening at high speeds, it can be very deceptive to have something stationary in your path.

Finally, the guy behind could even have been going to overtake from behind a few vehicles, or from a few lanes over, behind a van perhaps and not have even had chance to see the stationary vehicle. I'm not saying it's likely but until we see a boot-cam we can't be sure.