Starting to really enjoy Olbermann's stuff, it's like TDS on steroids (on a scale of 0 to sarcasm) and it seems more genuine. He spends less time on the low hanging fruit and more time on the real issues.

>> ^lantern53:

As usual, I think the majority of people would strongly disagree with Mr. Olbermann.


As usual, you're wrong.
I hope all the Tea Partiers and Fox News Zombies continue to think that 20% is a majority.

As usual, I think the majority of people would strongly disagree with Mr. Olbermann.

Thanks, all fixed.

In reply to this comment by AdrianBlack:
*dead

>> ^lantern53:

Has Olbermann ever named Jeffrey Immelt as the worst person in the world?
guy is a 1%er, his company made billions and paid no income taxes
Oh yeah...Immelt owns MSNBC.


a) Being CEO of a corporation does not confer ownership. That is where stocks come in.
b) Current TV is not equal to MSNBC.
c) Enumerating the million or so 1%ers not good television makes.

Has Olbermann ever named Jeffrey Immelt as the worst person in the world?

guy is a 1%er, his company made billions and paid no income taxes

Oh yeah...Immelt owns MSNBC.

Your video, Keith Olbermann and the Sarah Silverman Moment, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

>> ^hpqp:

...in bed.

_ba-dum-tish
>> ^Boise_Lib:
>> ^Yogi:
There's nothing hotter than a funny woman.

A naked, funny woman?



... Made of lava.

...in bed.


_{*ba-dum-tish*}

>> ^Boise_Lib:

>> ^Yogi:
There's nothing hotter than a funny woman.

A naked, funny woman?

>> ^Yogi:

There's nothing hotter than a funny woman.


A naked, funny woman?

HEAR HEAR! She got a laugh, so maybe that was the point.

>> ^geo321:

wtf

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Elliot Spitzer, Keith Olbermann' to 'Elliot Spitzer, Keith Olbermann, Occupy Wall Street, OWS' - edited by notarobot

Your video, Olbermann wears Guy Fawkes Mask for Halloween, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

The false dichotomy is in Olbermann's call for Jean Quan to resign. It has nothing to do with the tactics that OPD employed.
You misunderstand me if you think I'm in support of Quan and the Police's actions. I simply think that overblown rhetoric doesn't make for good journalism. The debate would better be served by reason and reporting than by appeals to emotion. I don't need Keith Olbermann to tell me how I'm supposed to feel about violence. Perhaps it's a radical thought, but I trust people to be able to make up their own minds.
>> ^rougy:

>> ^Sayja:
"Provocative attention grabbing sentence. Patronizing set up. Shame on you. Hyperbole. Shame on you. False analogy. Outrage. Ad hominem! False Dilemma!"
Fuck this. As a resident of Oakland, I deplore seeing more violence in a city already plagued by violence. I would much rather see the city act in support its citizen's right to speak out against injustice. However, I'm fed up with seeing Olbermann and the clowns he left at MSNBC abuse such childish tactics. I refuse to pat someone on the back simply because they've become a yelling head for our side. Is the intended implication that we're not smart enough to make our own judgements in reaction to this footage?
The way I see it, Olbermann is left with only one false dichotomy: learn how to practice journalism and contribute to the meaningful debate that our country needs or resign.

Yeah?
A false dichotomy? I don't see where that equates to riot gear cops shooting people with rubber bullets and lobbing shock grenades into the crowd.
I think you're on the wrong side here, boy.

>> ^Sayja:

"Provocative attention grabbing sentence. Patronizing set up. Shame on you. Hyperbole. Shame on you. False analogy. Outrage. Ad hominem! False Dilemma!"
Fuck this. As a resident of Oakland, I deplore seeing more violence in a city already plagued by violence. I would much rather see the city act in support its citizen's right to speak out against injustice. However, I'm fed up with seeing Olbermann and the clowns he left at MSNBC abuse such childish tactics. I refuse to pat someone on the back simply because they've become a yelling head for our side. Is the intended implication that we're not smart enough to make our own judgements in reaction to this footage?
The way I see it, Olbermann is left with only one false dichotomy: learn how to practice journalism and contribute to the meaningful debate that our country needs or resign.


Yeah?

A false dichotomy? I don't see where that equates to riot gear cops shooting people with rubber bullets and lobbing shock grenades into the crowd.

I think you're on the wrong side here, boy.