Web 1.0 : People publish whatever they want on space they rent, other people read it.

Web 2.0 : People publish whatever they want (within the terms of use) for free (provided they license their contribution indefinitely and provide an email address) on a huge corporate site surrounded by advertising, and then other people come along and say "FIRST!" and "LAME!" and "ILLUMINATI NWO OMFG!" and "VI@GRA SIDENAF1L MEDS CANADA" and "http://girls.ru" and "TX 4 ADD!"



btw, some people have been writing about the misguidedness of Web 2.0 since the start... http://theregister.com/ particularly Andrew Orlowski.

Truth being stranger than fiction, and using the time-honored, create the problem and provide the solution scenario, the US economy will continue to be manipulated to erosion, and we WILL, have some other system besides currency-NWO is working, according to the rule of a multiplicity of adjusted manuvuers.

it has only been what, 20 years or so that GB senior began talking it up??? Give it time...Noam Chomsky's vision of third-world everywhere is coming...just look at the totally fucked illegal Mexican problem...there IS a reason the laws are not enforced or encouraged to be, just like the drug war has been easy to manipulate from time to time here in the US....My suggestion? Grow weeed as a second income...THEY ARE NOT FIGHTING THE DRUG WAR ON POT NOWADAYS!

By 1970 there were over 1600 CFR members and in 1972 the Trilateral Commission was formed by Rockefeller (Chairman of the CFR). The CFR and the Trilateral Commission are not US Government created entities. The Council's first recruitment of a future president occurred in 1950 with Eisenhower. Since then every president (except Reagan) has been a CFR/Trilateral commission member and these presidents have filled their staff with other CFR members.

One example of how a presidential elect that claims he doesn't want NWO personnel in his administration, however ends up appointing such people to their cabinet is Reagan.

He was neither a CFR or Trilateral Commission member. He was neither a Skull & Bonesman or Bilderberger, however he was a Bohemian Grovesman.

When Reagan was asked who really ran the United States, Reagan admitted: "I think there is an elite in this country and they are the ones who run an elitist government (shadow government). They want a government by a handful of people because they don't believe the people themselves can run their lives... Are we going to have an elitist government that makes decisions for people's lives or are we going to believe as we have for so many decades, that the people can make these decisions for themselves?".

It also seems that Reagan was thinking along similar lines to Jimmy Carter when he gave his pre-election promise to avoid "insiders" when selecting his cabinet. When Reagan was elected, he formed a transitional team that would act as kind of a recruitment agency for the major positions in the new administration. Of the 59 people Reagan appointed for the team, 29 were members of the CFR, ten were Bilderbergers, and astonishingly, ten were from the dreaded Trilateral Commission. With George H.W. Bush as his Vice Presidential running mate, Reagan was not about to make the CFR or the Trilateral Commission or any other secret group into a campaign issue.

When Reagan entered the White House, he appointed 12 members of the Trilateral Commission, six of whom were also CFR members. As a sign of the true state of secret group influence, there were another 64 appointees who were also members of the CFR.

This from a man that stated he would take control and keep the government from being controlled by a shadow government. He appointed the exact people he vowed not to have in his office.

Today in the Bush administration, every single appointee is a CFR member. The CFR prohibits its members from disclosing anything that has been said within it's closed meetings to outsiders. A recent breakdown of the 4200+ members today reveals that 31% come from the corporate sector, 25% come from academia, 15% from charities, 13% from government, 8% from law, 6% from the media and 2% from other professions. CFR members are on the boards of the following sample of corporations: Citicorp, J.P.Morgan Chase, Boeing, Conoco, Disney, IBM, Exxon Mobil, Dow Jones, Viacom/CBS, Time Warner, Carlyle Group, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse First Boston, Chevron Texaco, Lockheed Martin, Hailliburton, Washington Post/Newsweek.

The CFR has been the breeding grounds for future presidents and their administrations for several decades now. Whether Republican or Democrat, the men and women in power will have been schooled in foreign relations by the council. If there is a shadow government at work then you can guarantee the puppet strings pass through the Pratt House (CFR).

--------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want to read up on the CFR (and not from the CFR itself), one good source of an examination of the CFR from it's initial creation up to today is a book written by 2 authors.

One is Thom Burnett (One of Britain's leading experts on security and military affairs. He served with UK Special Forces in the 90's and has been undertaking postgraduate research in Conspiracy Theory and Military Intelligence. The other author is Alex Games - Author and journalist for the London Evening Standard, UK's Financial Times, Sunday Times, Daily Telegraph, Guardian and Independent on Sunday).

The book is called: "Who Really Runs the World?: The war between globalization and democracy". Pages 100-120 descibe many details about the CFR's history from inception to today.

jwray stated: "Electing him (Ron Paul) would risk another conservative appointment to the supreme court."

I trust him for what decisions he would make for any appointments to government positions. He's not like the neocons, jwray. He wouldn't put a crazy unqualified person like Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court like Bush tried to do. Remember - Ron Paul is a Libertarian.

I also agree that Dennis Kucinich would be an excellent choice - another honest candidate. You stated that Clinton or Obama would be preferrable to all of the Republican candidates. I disagree... Ron Paul would be preferrable to them because Clinton is elite neocon trash that takes her orders from the NWO agenda of the CFR and Bilderbergers. Obama is also a CFR member but I'm not sure to the true extent of his possible corruption. It's clear that they both are going to keep us in the perpetual war that the Bush administration got us into.

Ultimately this is a bad thing for America... many of our soldiers die each day in a land which we have no claim to - so that Cheney's Halliburton can tap the oil resources of the region. Meanwhile the auto industry developed hundreds of electric cars and as momentum for these cars and the advancement of the technology was taking root in California, they decided to remove these leased vehicles from their owners and destroy them all. Yes, they crushed them and are preventing us from using non-petrolium dependent vehicles. Watch http://www.videosift.com/video/Who-Killed-The-Electric-Car-1 -- All of these things tie together you know. This is the result of the domination of the petrolium industry. Including the war.

Ultimately though, your probably right, Kucinich may not make it past the primaries because most people are on the 1stTube and are fed a streaming neocon diet. This may be the ultimate downfall of our Country.

The 2-party system is but an illusion. With CFR members taking the bulk of both sides... and also ultimately deciding who the "Official" party candidate will be, Choggie is correct in a sense... because if the population ends up realizing this and demands that a non-CFR/NWO member become the president, well... let's just say they have thought of that possibility as well. For some reason the statement: "in the form of a mushroom cloud" comes to mind. A definite sure-fire way to implement Directive 51.

Either way.. I registered Republican and will be voting in the primaries for Ron Paul. I'm not crazy about his view on abortion but I agree with him on everything else, he's got lots of experience, he's an insider but not a CFR member. He's honest, kind, but most of all - He's there to uphold the Constitution above all else.

We need our troops back on the homefront. They should be here to defend our country.. not dying in some other sovereign nation. I get the feeling we may need them here soon. There is a storm coming..... and it's got UN/WB written all over it.

I'm what some people call "middle-of-the-road" because I agree and disagree with both sides. I try to look beyond lies of both sides and I lean to the left and to the right on various issues. This doesn't make me very popular with either side and you'll notice that I don't get alot of votes on many of my vids because of people's perceptions of me. The left thinks I'm right and the right thinks I'm left. I'm a registered Republican because I'm supporting Ron Paul however if it were my choice I'd be registered as a Libertarian, but I want to vote for Ron in the primaries.

I don't like any of the other Republican candidates, I respect a couple of the Democratic candidates, but I feel that almost all the candidates on both sides don't truly have our best interests at heart, don't respect the Constitution and many are CFR members and some are "Bilderberg" candidates such as Hillary Clinton (I think she was their prime choice for president). Any of the leaders of our country that would attend a secret annual NWO convention where the media is not allowed to report on - and not expose it definitely does not have my vote.

I will add your vid to my playlist.. I vote based on the content and quality of the videos people post. I don't care what their personal beliefs are, I don't care if they've downvoted me, I don't play follow the leader with voting.

In reply to this comment by marinara:
I donno what you are politically, but please playlist my stuff:
http://www.videosift.com/video/President-Ahmadinejad-on-news-magazine-60-Minutes
thansk

"Net Neutrality protects free market and doesn't allow someone to regulate content on the net."

well, no, net neutrality regulation restricts the free market. apparently in a free market there would be no net neutrality because that's not what the market wants. (whether or not that is bad is another argument)

"Its called bandwidth, the more you have the faster the site loads. You are confusing amount of bandwidth in content versus speed of more bandwidth."

I certainly am confused... what's the difference, rich people can afford more, nike can have a bigger flashier faster website than my local shoe shop, you get what you pay for, and theoretically in a free market everybody gets more for less.

There is definitely an issue with competition, I for example have no choice of provider, therefore shitty expensive connection. I would think activists would worry more about that than about rupert murdoch buying the whole internet.

Remember that these big companies don't give a shit how they make money, meaning if millions of people make interesting websites, they will sell access to that at a competitive rate, they don't really care about spreading the NWO, it's just that in the old world of TV and press they got tempted to control things and make more money, NWO is where the money was.

Now i think they realise (for example) that they don't know shit about music, and they are trying to find ways to monetize independent music. They will change to whatever is most profitable. I think they would find it hard to convince everyone to buy into a fucked up corporate internet... it was much easier with TV and press. They tried with the internet, but I don't think they can succeed, and it think they will always fail. The internet was built to survive nuclear war ffs! wooha!

bamdrew stated:"nobody has been this close to being president who's like Obama in a long time... he's in nobody's pocket"

Obama was on the Council of Foreign Relations... In my opinion anyone that has been a member of this illegitimate organization is in the pocket of the neocon NWO agenda which plays both sides.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Kissinger, NWO, Oy Vey' to 'Kissinger, Rose, NWO, globalization, Oy Vey' - edited by choggie

Apparently they made some friends, some of which got in trouble, however were never really punished. You get a get-out-of-jail free card if your part of the NWO plan it seems. http://www.videosift.com/video/The-Secret-Government-The-Constitution-in-Crisis-1

The NWO was objective #5 during that speech it seems. Not the other way around, as in NWO Objectives, #'s 1-5. His "NWO" was contingent on the other "objectives" succeeding. I don't know if the fact that this isn't discussed a whole lot is any more evidence for it's relevance. There has to be a video somewhere of that whole speech, for better context...

I do think it's important, however, in context of how it was interpreted by Al Qaeda and other groups...but overall it seems folly to take what Bush Snr was saying at face value. If one was smart enough to bring about such an insidious scheme for world domination, why bother announcing it to the public at all? I think it's just a matter of wrong & careless word usage or inflammatory rhetoric. "If someone was behind the scenes, pulling all the strings, it certainly wasn't him...."

Also, thanks for getting the "Gummy Bear" theme stuck back into my head, just when I thought I'd nearly forgotten it! "Magic and mystery are part of their history...la da da dee dee dum...with gummy beary juice."

"calling you a retard would be an insult to the retarded people of this world. "

Well, the university I teach for is gonna be mighty disappointed to find that out. I'm sure they'll be happy to rescind my stipend on your recommendation. That reminds me: after you out me as a moron, do you think you could get me one of those cool yellow helmets? I do fall down quite a bit, and I figure once I line it with tin foil it will be good protection against the NWO mind control rays. No? Darn.

The point is that other people (like me) have seen the same video and think that there **just might** be alternative interpretations of the comments. I mean, for this to count as the "smoking gun" that proves your theory--as evidence so strong you'd have to be retarded or willfully ignorant to deny it--we have to assume that the speakers are using the phrase "new world order" exactly the same way you are (i.e. that they are admitting to working tirelessly to institute some dastardly new political order in which sovereignty is abandoned and dominion over us achieved). Sorry, but I'm not buying it! They simply do not mean what you mean.

Look, CP, believe what you want. Post your videos. I'll even upvote them. But quit insulting our intelligence with all the "you're so blind," and "you'd have to be retarded not to see this" bullshit. You are not some enlightened harbinger of doom trying to warn us all. You are not someone who was brave enough to "take the pill" that made the scales fall from your eyes (and contra your pic, you are not here to offer the rest of us such a pill). You are just a guy who has seen The Matrix one too many times, and thinks he has somehow risen above the rest of us sheeple to get a glimpse of the truth.

I'm not buying that, either.

It's not a "ban-all-government" idealogy, theo. It's an ideology that is synonomous to what our founding fathers have decreed. Those like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Andrew Jackson and several others. We've been warned by many a congressman and president of sinister plots against our freedoms and liberties of which has been slowly chipped away (now more rapidly than ever). If our Constitutional rights are fully taken away then this country is lost, next is the rest of the world. The NWO's prime agenda is to first slowly dismantle America's freedoms (ironically in the name of freedom and security). It will make Orwell's 1984 look like a holiday vacation if we let them succeed.

hmmm.. asking for adequate evidence? What could be more adequate than this? Former president Bush declaring NWO agenda #5 being met and that "they" WILL succeed in world domination.

NWO Objective #4: To get the Gummy Bears theme song stuck in everyone's head.