search results matching tag: nut shot

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds

    Videos (31)     Sift Talk (1)     Blogs (0)     Comments (70)   

mas8705 (Member Profile)

What happened before Code Pink was Hit? Here it is.

Payback says...

>> ^imstellar28:
>> ^Payback:
Wow, this thread sure has people putting their heads up their asses. Jeez, this is a video rating site, not Capitol Hill...

Its a controversial video, in a political channel--what do you expect? If you're anti-intellectual, stick to the big boobs, nut shots, and fluffy bunny videos.



mmmm big boobs....

What happened before Code Pink was Hit? Here it is.

Shepppard says...

>> ^imstellar28:
>> ^Payback:
Wow, this thread sure has people putting their heads up their asses. Jeez, this is a video rating site, not Capitol Hill...

Its a controversial video, in a political channel--what do you expect? If you're anti-intellectual, stick to the big boobs, nut shots, and fluffy bunny videos.


I'm sorry, do you have something to prove here?

From what i've read about your comments, you take things out of context and try to make some form of rebuttal against them.


"You clearly have no understand of the meaning of excessive force. Excessive force is judged, and is applied to the current situation only! It has nothing to do with past actions--it has to do with the current state of the arrestee. No matter how belligerent/criminal they were acting prior, if they are currently passive and cooperating you cannot apply force based on previous actions."

This seems to be a cover-up for the fact that you said that cops aren't allowed to do anything to someone who has been shooting cops.

"She could have shot 10 cops right before this, and they still could not have used that much force to arrest her."

Of which, two things. First, you only furthered their point about "But that doesn't mean that it would be excessive in every situation."

See, what I draw from that is, That much force can be used in certain situations and not be called Excessive, and that seems to be what you're trying to lecture them about.

And the second thing, If you think cops aren't allowed to use lethal force to subdue a target that's been shooting at officers, no matter how innocent they were in the first place, THEY JUST FUCKING SHOT 10 COPS. Lets even take cops out of the picture and replace it. THEY JUST FUCKING SHOT 10 PEOPLE.

There.

>> ^imstellar28:
>> ^anyprophet:
These types of videos always bring out the crazies who think we live in some kind of police state.

What is that, a joke? Rights don't mean anything unless you have them when you need them and in every single case in recent memory when someone actually needed them, they were violated. How is that not a police state?
Examples:
Confiscation of firearms during Katrina
Japanese sent to internment camps after pearl harbor
The American citizen who was sent to Guantanamo bay for several years.
Inability to protest in public (freedom cages)
Un-prosecuted Police Brutality



Ooo, a fun one now. Lets start with.. Oh, The guns, during Katrina. Now, you can keep in mind I'm canadian, and maybe we somehow think differently about these things up here.. But during a state of mass panic of the people, where mass disaster is happening, looting, all that fun stuff, I don't think it's a smart idea to have any form of firearm. All that's going to cause is more potential panic and destruction.

Japanese sent to internment camps? wow, we're really digging here aren't we. You are right for that point, their right to freedom was compromised, but that somehow doesn't fall under the category of "Recent Memory" to me. That more falls under the.. "There was a war going on at the time" category of things where lots of bad shit happened.

>> ^imstellar28:
>> ^Aemaeth:
>> ^charliem:
Its legal to defend yourself against a cop...hell you can kill a cop if they are arresting you and you are innocent.
Happened a few years back, guy got off any charges at all.

Wait, what? You can't be serious. What country is that in?
"I knew I hadn't been speeding, but he kept writing that ticket anyway, so I shot him."

Jesus you're ignorant. What is the difference between a cop and a criminal who approaches you, while you are minding your own business and not breaking any laws, and tries to utilize lethal force against you? Nothing! Unless the cops badge number is 007, he doesn't have a license to kill. If your life is in danger--from cop or criminal--you have a legal right to defend yourself. What country are you living in?


ohh... an attempt at a joke! It really wasn't funny.
Why don't we backtrack here to show the point they were making originally, but YOU were too ignorant to see it.

"She could have shot 10 cops right before this, and they still could not have used that much force to arrest her."

The main quote, by the way, really doesn't have anything backing it up, So far it's just someone saying "I heard once that..." which really has nothing to it. For all WE know, that's exactly what happened.

Other then that, their quote was a joke. That happens on the sift. a lot. They're usually funny... usually.

>> ^imstellar28:
If someone initiates lethal force on you, irregardless of the circumstances, you have the right to defend yourself with lethal force as well....
How hard is it to make a simple argument around here without a bunch of random, irrelevant crap spewed in response?
Yes gwiz665, I understand you would go to trial after killing someone. Yes I also understand shooting a cop who simply arrests you is not a valid self defense argument. Why are you even making these points?
And for the 10th time, SDGundamX, what would be the point of finding out what she said beforehand--are you just curious or something? Because it has no bearing on the argument of excessive force.


Who the fuck are you to stifle curiosity? For all we know she threatened the cop, she could have punched him in the face, she could have been weilding a tazer that miraculously got knocked out of her hands by a big boobed woman carrying a fluffy bunny, and then went on to hit some guy in the nuts. The cop, then seeing his opportunity finally struck back at the woman and saved his life and then went on to cure cancer.

We don't know every single detail of the circumstances surrounding the lethal force. You've taken up an "Innocent until proven guilty" stance, where as the rest of us are actually being optimistic.

Whatever your issue is, being it getting off by trying to correct people over teh interwebs, or thinking you're somehow superior to the rest of the sifters because YOU KNOW HOW TO USE BOLD! just save the asshole routine, and watch the video.

Oh, and just a P.S. don't bother quoting me and trying to make yourself seem like a big man. This post is long enough as it is without it being picked apart, also: I don't care about what you have to say in response.

And now, I'm going to go get some pie.

What happened before Code Pink was Hit? Here it is.

imstellar28 says...

>> ^Payback:
Wow, this thread sure has people putting their heads up their asses. Jeez, this is a video rating site, not Capitol Hill...


Its a controversial video, in a political channel--what do you expect? If you're anti-intellectual, stick to the big boobs, nut shots, and fluffy bunny videos.

The Simpsons - Man Getting Hit by Football

Guy Hurts His Nuts Firing Shotgun

brycewi19 says...

Seriously had a sympathy physiological reaction with that tingling shot down my leg as if I myself just got nailed there, too.

Good thing about this guy, that nut shot should take care of the whole "passing his dna" through the gene pool. Let's hope those nuggets have been fried!

Ouch! Ski Accident

Videosift Roast announcement: Zifnab's turn to get toasty! (Parody Talk Post)

Self Defense - target the pelvis

direpickle says...

>> ^MarineGunrock:
Remember kids: The best tactical move is that in which the most is gained with a minimum of loss.
Punch em in the balls. I've never seen a guy take a blow there and not keel over[...]
Basically - run if you need to, but if you can't, fight dirty.


The groin is a good target, but you can't rely on it disabling someone every time. I practice a martial art, I rarely wear a cup, and I've taken plenty of nut shots. After the match I'll pretty much invariably want to vomit, but while I'm out there it's pretty possible to shrug it off and keep going, depending on how into it I am.

Of course, it's a function of exactly where and how and how hard you hit, too (some shots are harder to ignore than others). So, if you're going to go for a groin shot, I think you want to do the best you can to really grind them upward into the body (ow).

Still, running's the best option, and hitting something sensitive might give you the couple of seconds you need to get a head start (if you need it).

gwiz665 (Member Profile)

Skater didn't watch where he was going

lucky760 (Member Profile)

kronosposeidon says...

Okay, I didn't read what you originally wrote very carefully, because I failed to press the bottom-left arrow. So here's what happened when I did it:

- In my Firefox browser, nothing happened, i.e., the video didn't play, and no window popped open. I have pop-up blocker turned on with Firefox, so maybe that's why nothing happened.
- With my Opera browser a new tab popped open, with the video being auto-played on the Break website. That must be what you're talking about.
- I'm not even going to try it with IE. *The horror*

I hope that's not the way it is with all Break videos. Not that there's that many here to begin with, and I rarely go to Break in the first place. How many nut shots does a person need to see, really?

In reply to this comment by lucky760:
Really? Weird. It did it for me from home this morning and just now again here at work. Clicking the arrow in the video frame is fine, but the one in the bottom-left corner pops open the video's break page.

Strange. :-?

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
It doesn't do that for me.

In reply to this comment by lucky760:
(Off the how-gay-is-rottenseed topic: Is this embed trying to pop-up a window for everyone else? When I click the lower play button and when I close the page it tries to pop-up [like rottenseed watching the Chargers in a tight huddle?]. )

Frenchman emasculated by stationary object

Frenchman emasculated by stationary object

Police Sniper Takes Negotiations To A New Level



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon