Setlist (from YT post):

Paul's Piano Intro 0:34
Don't Let Me Down (rehearsal) 1:55
Maxwell's Silver Hammer (rehearsal) 2:16
Two Of Us (rehearsal) 6:27
I've Got A Feeling (rehearsal) 8:04
I've Got A Feeling (second take) 9:03
Oh, Darling! (intro) 11:17
One After 909 (rehearsal) 12:35
Jazz Piano 13:41
Two Of Us (second take) 14:48
Across The Universe (rehearsal) 17:02
Dig A Pony (rehearsal) 18:23
Suzy Parker (rehearsal) 19:22
I Me Mine (rehearsal) 20:25
For You Blue (rehearsal) 23:02
Besame Mucho (rehearsal) 27:19
Octopus's Garden (rehearsal) 29:21
You Got A Hold On Me (rehearsal) 33:29
The Long And Winding Road (rehearsal) 36:01
Shake, Rattle, and Roll (rehearsal) 37:22
Kansas City (rehearsal) 39:21
Dig It 41:53
Two of Us 47:10
Let It Be 50:40
The Long and Winding Road 54:41
ROOFTOP (intro) 58:15
Get Back 59:18
Don't Let Me Down 1:02:33
I've Got a Feeling 1:06:07
One After 909 1:09:50
Danny Boy 1:16:33
Dig A Pony 1:12:45
Get Back 1:16:45
Credits 1:20:01

Weeell, as Newton said "If I have seen further it is only by standing on the shoulders of giants" if you don't have any shoulders to stand on, it's easily forgivable to believe things which are not true.

By now we have a nice big giant to stand on, so let's do that.
>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

>> ^robv:
>> ^EMPIRE:
He really doesn't "believe" in evolution? (as if something that is a proven scientific FACT needs belief)
Then it's settled. The man is an idiot. No way around it.
There is no way I would vote for him. Not only because I'm not american, but because I have this weird tendency to not vote for people with severe mental problems. Wait... maybe that's a bit harsh. I mean to say I have a tendency not to vote for ignorant idiots.

Not standing behind (or however you want to phrase it) evolution infers a lot about a person. Primarily that that person is willing to sacrifice some degree of scientific reason in place of faith. And generally that's not what I look for in my elected officials.

Gottfried Leibniz, Isaac Newton, Max Planck, James Clerk Maxwell, Michael Faraday, ect...what a bunch of morons.

>> ^robv:

>> ^EMPIRE:
He really doesn't "believe" in evolution? (as if something that is a proven scientific FACT needs belief)
Then it's settled. The man is an idiot. No way around it.
There is no way I would vote for him. Not only because I'm not american, but because I have this weird tendency to not vote for people with severe mental problems. Wait... maybe that's a bit harsh. I mean to say I have a tendency not to vote for ignorant idiots.

Not standing behind (or however you want to phrase it) evolution infers a lot about a person. Primarily that that person is willing to sacrifice some degree of scientific reason in place of faith. And generally that's not what I look for in my elected officials.


Gottfried Leibniz, Isaac Newton, Max Planck, James Clerk Maxwell, Michael Faraday, ect...what a bunch of morons.

>> ^Stormsinger:

Missed it by THIS much!


OK, Maxwell Smart. Mmm, Agent 99 (the original actress back in those days).

Yeah if only I could find a straight up derivation... the spinor stuff is fairly simplistic I think most people would get it. I found the unification of electricity and magnetism, and although he wrote the equations down he didn't show how they are consistent, which was Maxwell's greatest feat.

Not so sure they were getting along.

Taken from Wiki:
In the film Let It Be, during the Twickenham sessions in January 1969, McCartney attempts to teach the song to the rest of the band,[1] who are clearly less than enthusiastic. McCartney can be heard sniggering at 1:21 as he sings the line "... writing fifty times I must not be so ..." on the studio recording. This is sometimes rumoured to be because as McCartney sang the line "so he waits behind," Lennon mooned McCartney from the control room.

>> ^garmachi:
Now that you mention it...
I was actually so focused on how well they were getting along and enjoying the songwriting process that it never occurred to me to take the lyrics into account. Time to dust off the Beatles MP3s!

>> ^garmachi:
That was fun to watch. Just curious, why the "dark" tag?


Maybe my sarcasm meter is on the fritz, but don't you think a song about murdering people with a hammer kind of qualifies as dark?

Well , it appears to me that string theory is a interesting attempt to "quantize" the space-time manifold (added with suitable supersymmetric structures ).Everything in higher dimensions become reduced to two-dimensional quantum field path integral models "living"on the string chart manifold (the intrinsic two-dimensional "string space-time").However , people impose dipheomorffism invariance on this intrinsic string parameter "space-time" which unfortunatelly get mixed with 2D conformal invariance , when one uses the sigma model Polyakov' action to assign "energy" for these "quantum -fluctuating extrinsic /observable higher dimension space-time process (quite different from the more geometrical Nambu-Goto string action ).In order to solve this problem one thus impose full sigma model conformal invariance by restricting that all strings Schwinger sources (the string higher dimensional field back grounds-including the own extrinsic space time manifold dimension!)to lead to a vanishing beta function for the sigma model Polyakov action at any perturbative order of the new universal coupling constant-the String length scale/Regge parameter.This produces an apparently well defined (?,and about the infrared 2D cut-off remotion on the perturbative Feynman calculationson the intrinsic string space-time ?) 2D Field theory for the extrinsic space-time quantum energy action, besides of fixing the string Schwinger sources to satisfy the usual Einstein-Maxwell-etc field equations at one loop and the extrinsic space-time dimension and the classical manifold topology of the extrinsic space-time to be fixed, when one has supersymmetry (Spin manifold space time structures,etc..).At this point , one has an apparently well defined quantum -mechanical framework to evaluate numerically scattering amplitudes (including quantum gravity!-the old dream ) to compare with the experimental results.That is the problem on this new quantum-mechanical framework : as far as I know nothing has been matched with the usual qed,qcd,etc results!(anomalous particle magnetic momentum, deduction of the asymptotic freedom in QCD ,The Higgs mechanism on the weak sector ,etc.

Sons of Maxwell are from *Canada.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'guitar, band, revenge, pr, bureacracy, airline, plane' to 'guitar, band, revenge, pr, bureacracy, airline, plane, Sons of Maxwell' - edited by notarobot

Growing up it never occured to me that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" was about a serial killer, even though the chorus clearly explains it. I guess it was the cheerful tune of the song that fooled me.

SOMEONE SAYS "IS THIS OKAY" YOU SAY?
To Her Door

WHAT WOULD BEST DESCRIBE YOUR PERSONALITY?
Enter Sandman

WHAT DO YOU LIKE IN A GUY/GIRL?
The Weather

HOW DO YOU FEEL TODAY?
Liquid Breakfast

WHAT IS YOUR LIFE'S PURPOSE?
Money

WHAT IS YOUR MOTTO?
My Hero

WHAT DO YOUR FRIENDS THINK OF YOU?
Beautiful Stranger

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR PARENTS?
From St Kilda To Kings Cross

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT VERY OFTEN?
Camp Bachelor Alma Mater

WHAT IS 2+2?
Fallible

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR BEST FRIEND?
Empty Chairs

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE PERSON YOU LIKE?
Tonight is the night I fell asleep at the wheel

WHAT IS YOUR LIFE STORY?
Haunted

WHAT DO YOU WANT TO BE WHEN YOU GROW UP?
Hotel Song

WHAT DO YOU THINK WHEN YOU SEE THE PERSON YOU LIKE?
You

WHAT DO YOUR PARENTS THINK OF YOU?
Maxwell's Silver Hammer

WHAT WILL YOU DANCE TO AT YOUR WEDDING?
1995 (This question is stupid as I'm already married)

WHAT WILL THEY PLAY AT YOUR FUNERAL?
God

WHAT IS YOUR HOBBY/INTEREST?
The Shadow of Seattle

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF YOUR FRIENDS?
Casino

WHATS THE WORST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN?
Lose Your Delusion II

HOW WILL YOU DIE?
Don't take your love away from me

WHAT IS THE ONE THING YOU REGRET?
Pilate's Dream

WHAT MAKES YOU LAUGH?
'Cuz I can

WHAT MAKES YOU CRY?
Reunion

WILL YOU EVER GET MARRIED?
Tangled up in Blue (Another stupid question thanks to my married state)

WHAT SCARES YOU THE MOST?
Sell Sell Sell

DOES ANYONE LIKE YOU?
Ballad of a Dead Man

IF YOU COULD GO BACK IN TIME, WHAT WOULD YOU CHANGE?
C.U.S.T.

WHAT HURTS RIGHT NOW?
Back To You

>> ^rottenseed:
>> ^Fjnbk:
You can be like John or Paul. John wrote songs about his own experiences, Paul wrote songs about other things. I guess it boils down to if you prefer Help! or Maxwell's Silver Hammer. There's nothing wrong with either (but John was a better songwriter).

Or you can be like Ringo and fuck up a perfectly good album with "Octopus's Garden"


Octopus's Garden is a work of genius. It's the happiest song ever written.

>> ^Fjnbk:
You can be like John or Paul. John wrote songs about his own experiences, Paul wrote songs about other things. I guess it boils down to if you prefer Help! or Maxwell's Silver Hammer. There's nothing wrong with either (but John was a better songwriter).

Or you can be like Ringo and fuck up a perfectly good album with "Octopus's Garden"

You can be like John or Paul. John wrote songs about his own experiences, Paul wrote songs about other things. I guess it boils down to if you prefer Help! or Maxwell's Silver Hammer. There's nothing wrong with either (but John was a better songwriter).