"stop action post-it note animation, makes me happy and will make you happy too probably."

That's why we have a *Happy channel.

Welcome to the sift.

>> ^HugeJerk:
My biggest issue with this video is calling the guy the "Christmas Bomber"... if Richard Reed is the "Shoe Bomber" this guy should be the "Underpants Bomber".


When she wants to be lighthearted, she calls him the "Thunderpants bomber" if that makes you happy.

hey look, r10k came back, wrote more nothing and left again... bravo.

I thought you might actually be specific, with ANY example at all from the bible as to what you mean, but you haven't.

So, we're done here, and you'll delude yourself into thinking that you've 'won' this argument because we couldn't rebut you... except that you haven't said anything to rebut. So as long as you never say anything, no-one can refute you and you can think that you're winning this huge war against us pagans.

Well, if it makes you happy.

I, personally, would actually put my view about the bible out there... put out the actual thing that I thought that Pratchett was wrong about out there and see if it holds up to us picking at it. If it did then I could be happy that my reasoning has held up... if not, then I would go and see where I went wrong.

But you continue with your 'go and read the bible' line, which is meaningless, if it makes you feel good about seemingly having no actual basis for argument.

Hey , Winstonfield_Pennypacker ,
is all that you do hate?
With 3 votes for videos in 1.5 years?
426 comments , and 3 votes? Isn't there anything that you actually like?
Or are you in fact a modern metaphor for archie bunker .
You don't know science .
You bail out of any argument or debate as soon as it becomes clear your losing .
So you come here to bitch at people who don't believe the same as you .
To what end or effect ?
what change is it you hope to affect ?
This site isn't only about american points of view .
And just in case you hadn't noticed the pendulum went the other way the last time we had a say in it.
I hope you find something that makes you happy , somewhere , cause from reading your stuff , this aint it .

1 last thing , you haven't even heard the american left .
try amy goodman / juan gonzalez and democracy now , you've been getting it easy for a long time from the Centrist Media.
The 1st time you meet the real progressive radical left , your brains gonna go boom.

>> ^lucky760:
Here's my entry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO4bZ7O1cqc
It's not funny so it doesn't go in comedy.
He's not doing anything unusual, just shopping at a Walgreen's pharmacy so it's not wtf.
It doesn't make you happy.
It's not dark.
There are no kids or cats and dogs or anything cute.
It's not geeky and no engineering is happening.
There's no music.
He's not in Asia or Britain or Canada or Down Under and there's no animation.
It's not packed with action.
It's not about the brain.
No comics, commercials, cooking, nor cult.
He tells the truth so it can't go in lies...
So yeah. Without a fatguys or beards channel, I think this could be a wiener.

it's viral

Here's my entry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO4bZ7O1cqc

It's not funny so it doesn't go in comedy.
He's not doing anything unusual, just shopping at a Walgreen's pharmacy so it's not wtf.
It doesn't make you happy.
It's not dark.
There are no kids or cats and dogs or anything cute.
It's not geeky and no engineering is happening.
There's no music.
He's not in Asia or Britain or Canada or Down Under and there's no animation.
It's not packed with action.
It's not about the brain.
No comics, commercials, cooking, nor cult.
He tells the truth so it can't go in lies...

So yeah. Without a *fatguys or *beards channel, I think this could be a wiener.

>> ^fford:
Part Three is waiting to be posted.


Done! Thanks fford!

Also if this doesn´t make you *happy I don´t know what will...

"I may have a ssssolution. You see, I have this special ehmmm.. sting. It's almost painless."
"Snake in the grass."
"One sting is quite enough to make you happy and free."
The scriptwriter/songwriter must have had the day of his life.

Most people feel safer around cops not only because they have guns, but because everyone (including criminals) knows they have guns. Why? Because bullets hurt and criminals don't like getting shot. This is why cops are rarely mugged, as opposed to old ladies in dark alleyways.

If something had happened in Compton, like a couple guys walking up and stating "I'm gonna kill you" , are you telling me that you would feel less safe if two (armed) cops showed up? How about if two (visibly unarmed) random passersby showed up?

I find it hard to believe that you don't feel safer around people with guns.

The truth is that, in most cases you aren't going to be lucky enough to have a couple cops walk in on a crime in progress. If two people walk up to you and state that they are going to kill you, 911 isn't going to help, the only thing that could possibly save your life is a firearm carried a nearby citizen, or you. This is true whether the weapon is a gun, a knife, a baseball bat, or a fist.

In reply to this comment by spoco2:
I think you expect me to say 'Yes, because they had guns'.

But my actual answer is 'No, because they just sat in their car and told us to leave.

I don't think you'll ever see the point. You think that if you have a gun you're safe, and that everyone can have guns because then everyone is safe. But all it means is that more people die from guns.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
Did you feel safer next to the cops, and if so why?

In reply to this comment by spoco2:
Nope, because I live in a country with sensible gun control laws. (Australia)

Actually, the only time I've really feared for my wellbeing just by being in an area was when me and some friends somehow ended up in Compton, LA at night, and had the police bring us over to their squad car and tell us that we'd better get out of that area pretty quickly if we didn't want to be dead soon. Hurray for guns, hurray for everyone being armed, it makes you all so much safer.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
Just guessing, you've never been close to violence have you?


In reply to this comment by spoco2:
You keep repeating your mantra of 'you need guns to defend against other guns'.

You keep doing that if it makes you happy.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
A whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, who don't have guns, that is.

In reply to this comment by spoco2

To say that people have been able to kill people before the advent of guns is stating the absolute bleeding obvious, doesn't change the fact that guns make it a whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, quickly. And easier to accidentally kill people, or yourself for that matter.

I think you expect me to say 'Yes, because they had guns'.

But my actual answer is 'No, because they just sat in their car and told us to leave.

I don't think you'll ever see the point. You think that if you have a gun you're safe, and that everyone can have guns because then everyone is safe. But all it means is that more people die from guns.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
Did you feel safer next to the cops, and if so why?

In reply to this comment by spoco2:
Nope, because I live in a country with sensible gun control laws. (Australia)

Actually, the only time I've really feared for my wellbeing just by being in an area was when me and some friends somehow ended up in Compton, LA at night, and had the police bring us over to their squad car and tell us that we'd better get out of that area pretty quickly if we didn't want to be dead soon. Hurray for guns, hurray for everyone being armed, it makes you all so much safer.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
Just guessing, you've never been close to violence have you?


In reply to this comment by spoco2:
You keep repeating your mantra of 'you need guns to defend against other guns'.

You keep doing that if it makes you happy.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
A whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, who don't have guns, that is.

In reply to this comment by spoco2

To say that people have been able to kill people before the advent of guns is stating the absolute bleeding obvious, doesn't change the fact that guns make it a whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, quickly. And easier to accidentally kill people, or yourself for that matter.

Did you feel safer next to the cops, and if so why?

In reply to this comment by spoco2:
Nope, because I live in a country with sensible gun control laws. (Australia)

Actually, the only time I've really feared for my wellbeing just by being in an area was when me and some friends somehow ended up in Compton, LA at night, and had the police bring us over to their squad car and tell us that we'd better get out of that area pretty quickly if we didn't want to be dead soon. Hurray for guns, hurray for everyone being armed, it makes you all so much safer.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
Just guessing, you've never been close to violence have you?


In reply to this comment by spoco2:
You keep repeating your mantra of 'you need guns to defend against other guns'.

You keep doing that if it makes you happy.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
A whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, who don't have guns, that is.

In reply to this comment by spoco2

To say that people have been able to kill people before the advent of guns is stating the absolute bleeding obvious, doesn't change the fact that guns make it a whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, quickly. And easier to accidentally kill people, or yourself for that matter.

Nope, because I live in a country with sensible gun control laws. (Australia)

Actually, the only time I've really feared for my wellbeing just by being in an area was when me and some friends somehow ended up in Compton, LA at night, and had the police bring us over to their squad car and tell us that we'd better get out of that area pretty quickly if we didn't want to be dead soon. Hurray for guns, hurray for everyone being armed, it makes you all so much safer.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
Just guessing, you've never been close to violence have you?


In reply to this comment by spoco2:
You keep repeating your mantra of 'you need guns to defend against other guns'.

You keep doing that if it makes you happy.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
A whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, who don't have guns, that is.

In reply to this comment by spoco2

To say that people have been able to kill people before the advent of guns is stating the absolute bleeding obvious, doesn't change the fact that guns make it a whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, quickly. And easier to accidentally kill people, or yourself for that matter.

Just guessing, you've never been close to violence have you?


In reply to this comment by spoco2:
You keep repeating your mantra of 'you need guns to defend against other guns'.

You keep doing that if it makes you happy.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
A whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, who don't have guns, that is.

In reply to this comment by spoco2

To say that people have been able to kill people before the advent of guns is stating the absolute bleeding obvious, doesn't change the fact that guns make it a whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, quickly. And easier to accidentally kill people, or yourself for that matter.

You keep repeating your mantra of 'you need guns to defend against other guns'.

You keep doing that if it makes you happy.

In reply to this comment by imstellar28:
A whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, who don't have guns, that is.

In reply to this comment by spoco2

To say that people have been able to kill people before the advent of guns is stating the absolute bleeding obvious, doesn't change the fact that guns make it a whoooole lot easier to kill people, and lots of them, quickly. And easier to accidentally kill people, or yourself for that matter.

As long as it isn't snuff or porn, let the people decide what belongs here through the voting process. Some people look down on LOLcats, and that's fine. That's their prerogative. But if it makes you happy, then why not vote for it? I don't see the harm.