>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/Yogi" title="member since May 15th, 2009" class="profilelink">Yogi
She didn't fuck the entire lacrosse team. There are 42 members on the roster. She slept with 13.
You have no idea what her goals were or even over what period of time she slept with those boys.
[Since when does engaging in sex twice a month with two different partners make you a slut.]
The 3rd definition "venal or unscrupulous person" still implies someone who is willing to be immoral for the proper compensation. i.e.
"Yogi's a comment whore. He'll post any type of comment you want for five bucks and a sandwich."
Again, you're only calling her a whore because it's socially acceptable.
Which is prejudice and shitty of you.


It pleases me that I bother you this much. Also no I'm not. You don't know me I look down on men who do the exact some bullshit...I'm an equal opportunity hater....or I'll hate for a sammich

This just in: the entire lacross team has discovered they've been gifted with genital herpes and multiple strains of HPV, including genital warts and a greater risk of penile and head & neck cancer.

It was worth it, though!

@Yogi

She didn't fuck the entire lacrosse team. There are 42 members on the roster. She slept with 13.

You have no idea what her goals were or even over what period of time she slept with those boys.
[Since when does engaging in sex twice a month with two different partners make you a slut.]

The 3rd definition "venal or unscrupulous person" still implies someone who is willing to be immoral for the proper compensation. i.e.

"Yogi's a comment whore. He'll post any type of comment you want for five bucks and a sandwich."

Again, you're only calling her a whore because it's socially acceptable.
Which is prejudice and shitty of you.

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/sirex" title="member since February 23rd, 2007" class="profilelink">sirex
Points to consider:
Accepting money in exchange for sexual favors. That makes you a whore.
Who the hell randomly chooses their sexual partners? Enjoy STDs much?
If anything, it makes sense that she'd make her selections from the same circle of candidates, for multiple reasons:
She obviously like athletic guys. It's much easier to obtain vital information. She'd have plenty of opportunities to court the ones she liked.
You're just calling her a whore cause our culture allows for it.


I think there's a difference between liking athletic guys liking sex and pursuing relationships...and fucking the entire Lacross team. This was a goal that she set for herself...to fuck all these guys. She succeeded grats to her, however yes she is a Whore. Sorry to cite this buttttt. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whore?show=0&t=1286402001

Under the 3rd definition "venal or unscrupulous person". She's certainly unscrupulous/

You fuck a LaCrosse team, but hate CANADIANS!?

BLASPHAMY!

THIS WOMAN IS A WHORE! A HARLOT! A TOTAL SLUT! RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!

liking sex is ok. When your randomly chosen sex partners all happen to play in the lacross team, that makes you a whore. Unless i dunno, you really really dig lacross ?

Haha, that sounds like me in high school. I was sort of friends with the straight-edge kids who were on the football & lacrosse team (ie fucking jocks). Friends with the cheesy fatwreck punk kids with their intolerable immaturities. Friends with the lo-fi art rock kids, the diy hardcore kids, the loner "abstract artists", the rich brats & golfing kids, the video game geeks, the film nerds and their Videodrome & Holy Mountain... but more importantly I stuck to myself and ended up with a bunch of beautiful weirdo loner babes.

Ironically, for Lev and I since we live in SF we may be loners but it is goddamned impossible to be alone here. Even loners make friends here because everyone in this town is pretty damn weird. The whole loner thing just doesn't work as an adult - but when your a kid it works charms if you're actually into interesting things that no one knows about. If you can't make friends - you're not really alone but it would be pretty damn emotionally isolating - since there are only people & buildings. It was difficult to get used to at first and well - I don't really remember what happened because I spent the next 8 years drinking my way to sociability. Well, until I moved to what I call the only slice of "Appalachia" on Bernal Heights.

Man, I'm sorry what happened to him, and it certainly shouldn't have happened by most accounts, but if he's gonna cry over getting kicked, he REALLY needs to rethink being in Lacrosse. That shit is evil.

Liberal Lies About National Health Care: Third in a Series (Commemorative Plates On Sale Now!)
Ann Coulter
Wednesday, September 02, 2009


(9) If you like Medicare, you'll love national health care, which will just extend Medicare's benefits to everyone.

Hey -- I have an idea: How about we make everyone in America a multimillionaire by pulling Bernie Madoff out of prison and asking him to invest all our money! Both Medicare and Bernie Madoff's investment portfolio are bankrupt because they operate on a similar financial model known as a "Ponzi scheme." These always seem to run fabulously well -- until the money runs out.

Not only is Medicare bankrupt, but it is extremely limited in whom and what it covers. If Medicare were a private insurer, it would be illegal in many states for failing to cover hearing aids, podiatry, acupuncture, chiropractic care, marriage counseling, aromatherapy and gender reassignment surgery.

Moreover, Medicare payments aren't enough to pay the true cost of those medical services it does cover. With Medicare undercutting payments to hospitals and doctors for patients 65 and older, what keeps the American medical system afloat are private individuals who are not covered by Medicare paying full freight (and then some). That's why you end up with a $10 aspirin on your hospital bill.

National health care will eliminate everything outside of Medicare, which is the only thing that allows Medicare to exist.

Obviously, therefore, it's preposterous for Democrats to say national health care will merely extend Medicare to the entire population. This would be like claiming you're designing an apartment building in which every apartment will be a penthouse. Everyone likes the penthouses, so why not have a building in which every apartment is a penthouse?

It doesn't work: What makes the penthouse the penthouse is all the other floors below. An "all-penthouse" building is a blueprint that could make sense only to someone who has never run a business and has zero common sense, i.e., a Democrat.

(10) National health care won't cover illegal aliens -- as the president has twice claimed in recent radio appearances.

Technically, what Obama said is that the bill isn't "designed" to give health insurance to illegal aliens. (That bill, the "Health Insurance for Illegal Aliens Act of 2009," was still being drafted by Ted Kennedy at the time of his death, may he rest in peace.)

But unless the various government bureaucracies dispensing health care are specifically required by law to ask about citizenship status, illegals will be covered. We can't even get employers and police to inquire about citizenship status, but liberals assure us that doctors will?

And by the way -- as with the abortion exclusion -- the Democrats expressly rejected amendments that would have required proof of residency status to receive national health care.

Still not convinced? Day after day, The New York Times has been neurotically asserting that national health care won't cover illegal aliens (without ever explaining how precisely it will exclude illegal aliens).

So far, just this week, these Kim Jong Il-style pronouncements have appeared in the Treason Times:

-- "Illegal immigrants will be covered. (Myth)" -- Katharine Q. Seelye, "Myth vs. Fact vs. Other," The New York Times, Sept. 2, 2009

-- "(Sen. Jim DeMint) fueled speculation that a health care overhaul would cover illegal immigrants, although specific language says it would not." -- Katharine Q. Seelye, "Fighting Health Care Overhaul, and Proud of It," The New York Times, Aug. 31, 2009

-- "'Page 50: All non-U.S. citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free health care services.' ... The falsehoods include (that italic statement)." -- Michael Mason, "Vetting Claims in a Memo," The New York Times, Aug. 30, 2009

-- "But that would not help illegal immigrants. Contrary to some reports, they would not be eligible for any new health coverage under any of the health overhaul plans circulating in Congress." -- Duff Wilson, "Race, Ethnicity and Care," The New York Times, Aug. 30, 2009

The last time the Times engaged in such frantic perseveration about a subject was when the paper was repeatedly insisting that Durham prosecutor Mike Nifong had a solid case against the Duke lacrosse players.

By August 2006, every single person in the United States, including the stripper, knew the stripper's claim of "gang rape" was a lie. That was when Duff Wilson -- quoted above -- co-wrote the Times' infamous cover story on the Duke case, titled: "Files From Duke Rape Case Give Details but No Answers." No answers!

(11) Obama has dropped his demand for the ironically titled "public option" (i.e., government-run health care), which taxpayers will not have an "option" to pay for or not.

Liberals never, ever drop a heinous idea; they just change the name. "Abortion" becomes "choice," "communist" becomes "progressive," "communist dictatorship" becomes "people's democratic republic" and "Nikita Khrushchev" becomes "Barack Obama."

It doesn't matter if liberals start calling national health care a "chocolate chip puppy" or "ice cream sunset" -- if the government is subsidizing it, then the government calls the shots. And the moment the government gets its hands on the controls, it will be establishing death panels, forcing taxpayers to pay for abortions and illegal aliens, rationing care and then demanding yet more government control when partial government control creates a mess.

Which happens to be exactly what liberals are doing right now.

Copyright © 2009 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.

>> ^gwiz665:
Someone once called me Homo Sapiens, so obviously I beat him up with my Lacrosse stick and proceeded to do push-ups while reciting the pledge of allegiance.


LOL. Apt.

Someone once called me Homo Sapiens, so obviously I beat him up with my Lacrosse stick and proceeded to do push-ups while reciting the pledge of allegiance.

I've always believed (although I only really thought about it with the Duke lacrosse team rape lies) that anyone found to have lied about being raped should receive the punishment that the accused rapist would have gotten.

Attempted rape/molestation of 4 people would result in a pretty hefty punishment.

That being said, I don't think the girl(s) making the claim were doing it seriously... just trying to give the cab driver an even harder time. The video doesn't say but I'd be curious to find out if they really kept up this lie in the presence of the police. Either way it is a serious issue and they deserve to pay him the 60k each, but if they also then lied to officers I have no problem with jail time.

"According to a police report filed on the incident, one of the young women contacted police the next morning to say they were very sorry for the trouble she and her friends caused and that they would not be pursuing any charges."

The wording on that made me snicker a bit. So very gracious of them, not to pursue the rape charge after all. I just can't believe that this kind of behavior isn't illegal itself, considering the HUGE consequences it could have had were there not proof to the contrary. I even looked up Crystal Magnum from the Duke Lacross incident to see what happened to her, and sure enough she's under no charges.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'daily show, jon stewart, cnn, nancy grace, lacrosse' to 'daily show, jon stewart, cnn, nancy grace, lacrosse, godwin' - edited by xxovercastxx

>> ^aspartam:
>> ^netean:
i thought lacrosse was just a sport girls played!

It's Canada's official national sport. Better watch yourself with that sneaky mouth of yours...


why, would canada do something about it?