Time to transfer some terabytes to Kate Upton.

" "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal." -- Da rules.

We're not prudes here, so 4 of those don't count of lack of proper nudity, and Girl in a Toyota is funny and has a story. Britta crosses the line and should also be * discussed. If it had been discussed and approved already, you'd have a point.>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^messenger:
Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.
They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.
On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-To
yota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goe
s-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents
-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-H
er-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-B
ETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows
I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.
I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

>> ^messenger:

Two aren't precedent because they have substance beyond the sexuality, and the third one is dead. The only focus of this piece is naked hot chicks. The policy is in place to keep single-purpose fap material elsewhere. I mean, is this enjoyable for any other reason?
And there's precedent for this too. There was a video with two or three hot topless women having a snowball fight. It was considered unfit for the Sift. (I searched now but couldn't find it again.) Even actual porn has been accepted, because it was a funny parody. This is nothing but boobs. I like that line to be clear.

They all work for me, but that's neither here nor there.

On the point of "single-purpose fap material"...
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Huh-Title-Just-a-minute
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Girl-in-a-Toyota-Supra-The-full-uncensored-version-in-HD
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Britta-from-Community-goes-topless-in-Choke
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Kate-Upton-The-Many-Talents-of-Kate-Upton
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/Hot-Girl-Dancing-Around-in-Her-Underwear
http://sexuality.videosift.com/video/French-game-shows-BETTER-than-Japanese-game-shows

I can't call this video enjoyable for any reason but that's also neither here nor there, IMO.

I like the line to be clear as well, but it never is. It depends who submits, who complains, what day it is, which way the wind is blowing, etc. I just can't justifiably call this pornographic; certainly no more so than any of those accepted videos above.

>> ^luxury_pie:
dead


Thanks for letting me know. It's fixed again...for now.

>> ^nomino:

I know boobs deserve an upvote, but I have to downvote because of the voice over. It's like putting ketchup in a fine red wine. I'm sorry, but I just can't support this.


Speaking of boobs. Where's your avatar from?

Funny but the VO made me laugh so hard I just had to upvote even though I hate TMZ

>> ^nomino:

I know boobs deserve an upvote, but I have to downvote because of the voice over. It's like putting ketchup in a fine red wine. I'm sorry, but I just can't support this.

I have a dilemma.

I can't upvote for TMZ.

I must upvote for Kate Upton's boobies.

>> ^Enzoblue:

I wish human women looked this good. Skin pore removal ftw!


Actually at 17 seconds in they reveal her neck and clavicle area and it does appear to have fine details.

>> ^jonny:

A possibly more effective thumbnail: http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/xdGsKzmCgB0/hqdefault.jpg

Possibly? Most definitely!

In reply to this comment by jonny:
*doublepromote - because Kate Upton needs to be more exposed, uh, needs more exposure.


Thanks Jonny! You have fine taste in sandwiches.

*doublepromote - because Kate Upton needs to be more exposed, uh, needs more exposure.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'carls jr, sandwich, kate, upton' to 'carls jr, sandwich, kate, upton, spicy, supermodel' - edited by jonny

>> ^quantumushroom:

I thought there were more than 6 straight dudes on the sift.


I am straight.

*hiphop *music