>> ^hpqp:

Sigh. For a moment (when you edited your first reply to something less childish and insulting) I thought you didn't want to come off as a closet misogynist with the rhetoric of an angry tweenager... guess I was wrong.

>> ^Yogi:
>> ^hpqp:
@Yogi
Yes, technically a "whore" is "a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money;" but also "a prostitute or promiscuous woman: often a term of abuse" (Collins Engl. dictionary; the part in bold comes up in practically all the online dictionaries google presents when searching "whore dictionary definition", and the Oxford Dictionary classes this word as "derogatory").

But this is not about definitions, it's about use, and your reactionary response seems to betray the fact that you know this full well (which is perhaps why you chose to truncate the M&W definition of "whore").
Your comment that I originally responded to contained truth, and would have probably received a lot more upvotes if it hadn't been for the first phrase. My response, in any case, was not meant as a personal attack, but simply a "heads up" to the negative connotation that term carries.

Fuck Off.



You don't understand what Fuck Off means? It means I don't care whether you live or die...just FUCK OFF!

Sigh. For a moment (when you edited your first reply to something less childish and insulting) I thought you didn't want to come off as a closet misogynist with the rhetoric of an angry tweenager... guess I was wrong.


>> ^Yogi:

>> ^hpqp:
@Yogi
Yes, technically a "whore" is "a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money;" but also "a prostitute or promiscuous woman: often a term of abuse" (Collins Engl. dictionary; the part in bold comes up in practically all the online dictionaries google presents when searching "whore dictionary definition", and the Oxford Dictionary classes this word as "derogatory").

But this is not about definitions, it's about use, and your reactionary response seems to betray the fact that you know this full well (which is perhaps why you chose to truncate the M&W definition of "whore").
Your comment that I originally responded to contained truth, and would have probably received a lot more upvotes if it hadn't been for the first phrase. My response, in any case, was not meant as a personal attack, but simply a "heads up" to the negative connotation that term carries.

Fuck Off.

>> ^hpqp:

@Yogi
Yes, technically a "whore" is "a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money;" but also "a prostitute or promiscuous woman: often a term of abuse" (Collins Engl. dictionary; the part in bold comes up in practically all the online dictionaries google presents when searching "whore dictionary definition", and the Oxford Dictionary classes this word as "derogatory").

But this is not about definitions, it's about use, and your reactionary response seems to betray the fact that you know this full well (which is perhaps why you chose to truncate the M&W definition of "whore").
Your comment that I originally responded to contained truth, and would have probably received a lot more upvotes if it hadn't been for the first phrase. My response, in any case, was not meant as a personal attack, but simply a "heads up" to the negative connotation that term carries.


Fuck Off.

@Yogi

Yes, technically a "whore" is "a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money;" but also "a prostitute or promiscuous woman: often a term of abuse" (Collins Engl. dictionary; the part in bold comes up in practically all the online dictionaries google presents when searching "whore dictionary definition", and the Oxford Dictionary classes this word as "derogatory").


But this is not about definitions, it's about use, and your reactionary response seems to betray the fact that you know this full well (which is perhaps why you chose to truncate the M&W definition of "whore").

Your comment that I originally responded to contained truth, and would have probably received a lot more upvotes if it hadn't been for the first phrase. My response, in any case, was not meant as a personal attack, but simply a "heads up" to the negative connotation that term carries.

They should just skip foreplay and go straight for the intercourse.

It hilarious that the same people who want to claim abstinence only education is 100% effective (their theory must be that the 99% who don't end up following their teachings just weren't actually taught and don't count) are invariably the same people that are 100% certain that virgin births DO happen, but are never ever smart enough to see the contradiction. (at least it would be if so many weren't in a position to make public policy)
Does this group allow anal and oral sex with Daddy? It's not intercourse, and so technically is abstinence.
Remember Quagmire's advice, the first thing to do when you meet a new girl (woman) is to ask the girl about her relationship with Daddy, if she says anything positive, move on to the next one.

>> ^rottenseed:

>> ^Opus_Moderandi:
Can't stand her voice (too wiggly) but, I'd love to do some recording in her studio, if ya know what I mean.

Do you mean sexual intercourse?


Absolutely.

>> ^Opus_Moderandi:

Can't stand her voice (too wiggly) but, I'd love to do some recording in her studio, if ya know what I mean.


Do you mean sexual intercourse?

"Now, if you're like me you might be asking yourself, 'Hey SuperMagnetMan, what would happen if I inserted a large magnet into my rectum?' Well, I think this impressive demonstration will really blow your mind...">> ^nach0s:

>> ^Seric:
That guy seems simultaneously very friendly and incredibly creepy

Sometimes, to learn something really cool, you have to put yourself at risk of non-consensual intercourse.

>> ^Seric:

That guy seems simultaneously very friendly and incredibly creepy


Sometimes, to learn something really cool, you have to put yourself at risk of non-consensual intercourse.

It's generally poor taste to laboriously dispense details about one's sexual escapades.

Revering those who eagerly and enthusiastically chase after sexual thrills lends to the belief that this type of behaviour is desirable. An anthropological detachment from the novelty of this kind of talk is lost on most people.

While there's nothing intrinsically wrong about discussing sex, one easily finds many civilizations where overt sexualism has been detrimental. Sex talk fine, idolizing and trivializing sex is dangerous.

This probably comes off as being a stuck-up old fart's opinion (I'm actually in my early twenties), but consider how the environment we have today has gives children the urge for intercourse even before they are physically ready for sex. We've allowed ten year old girls and boys to be perfectly comfortable in a world where hypersexualisation is normalcy.>> ^SveNitoR:

>> ^Pprt:
Making sex talk like this a banality is a horrible trend...

Why?

>> ^arvana:

The half-life of the transverse waves propagated from that slap indicate a damping factor of: FIRM.


You said exactly what I was going to post! So, instead...

In this new video being created by our highly skilled graduates; the camera speed will be slightly slower at 1000 FPS @1920x1080 (or higher if intended for use with IMAX or a screen over two meters) with a secondary stream containing a duplicate, but separate feed set proportionately two-centimeters apart from the other feed. Then slightly zoomed out at around a 5.7% overall frame increase in size and a slight 2° shift from the vertical, counter-clockwise. Then combine the two feeds to one feed, except beforehand, polarize the frames (or frame frequencies) 90° from the other (relatively). Hand out polarized glasses--that of course have a film matched to the polarized frequency. Then increase the overall playback time, matching with the framerate speed, to give a new perceived 30 minute length (20 seconds is ridiculous).

Then some 1960's or 1970's music can be added in (the beat of the music must match the wave speed; some "human intercourse" period film pieces may have the required music) to further increase the relation of wave propagation seen in the video demonstration. This will help add to the overall immersion and enjoyment of the experience.

Then, we suggest the use of lubrication (Group 5, with a Viscosity of 800cSt is recommended) and then use some transformational waves (many options are available) at a decent amplitude and frequency. One traditional method used is caused by simple human mechanical kinetic manipulation (flexing muscle groups) in a rhythmic horizontal/vertical oppositional motion spread out over a chosen time span. Speed, duration, and intensity are decided by the user or a human/non-human counterpart. Typically, this will propagate a strand of flagellates into a D-glucose polysaccharide chains in a combined structure for simple discontinuation and cleanup; then quickly proceeding on to the web browser and watching the next "sift*".

If "flagellate" reaction is not noticed or possible for you, please follow the yellow strip on the floor. On your way out you may participate in our free clinical study looking for medical problems. You will need to put on a special garment for the study, and you will receive a complimentary lollipop! Do not be disturbed if this reaction is not noticed as it is a well known and documented myth created by the sub-species that is the focus of our demonstration video. Do not be disturbed if you think you look like as said sub-species.

Thank you for watching our dissertation on wave propagation.
We look forward to our next project on fluid dynamics!


*sift, definition below

sift (sift)
verb. sift·ed, sift·ing, sifts
v.tr.
1. To put (flour, for example) through a sieve or other straining device in order to separate the fine from the coarse particles.
2. To distinguish as if separating with a sieve: sifted the candidates for the job.
3. To apply by scattering with or as if with a sieve: sift sugar on a dessert.
4. To examine and sort carefully: sift the evidence.
v.intr.
1. To make use of a sieve.
2. To pass through or as if through a sieve: a meal that sifts easily.
3. To make a careful examination: sifted through back issues of the magazine.

sift (suhifft)
noun. sift·ed, sift·ing, sifts, spelunking
n.wtf.
1. A video on the website called "Videosift™"; sometimes amusing.
2. A video not on the website called "Videosift™", fought over in a mating like ritual to become a sift.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Sorry, this is very similar to the previously submitted link:
http://videosift.com/video/Camera-inside-the-Vagina-during-intercourse-oh-my

Not all of it, but portions of it are sexually explicit, and also the porn ads that display on pause. It's gotta go. *discard.

Molestation with consensual intercourse then surprise "she doesn't wear a condom" sex. The Swedish know how to party!

They just need to figure out what they need to do after the party, because the women seem to have a mental breakdown and they sync up together, so watch out!

/one ticket
//this whole case is moronic

>> ^Gallowflak:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/Asmo" title="member since July 17th, 2008" class="profilelink">Asmo
I do apologize. I don't think I've ever gotten under someone's skin as quickly as that with as little contribution from me. Still, this is the internet. I'm not going to comment on your criticisms of my character because it's not my place to do so, nor would it serve any real purpose, but I can at least respond to your actual argument.
On to it...
First up!
"You give the whole game away when you use the term 'prostituting'. Oh, you can respect her okay just as long as everyone knows that she's a whore... Very tolerant of you. /eyeroll"
Wikipedia : "Prostitution is the act or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment. People who execute such activities are called prostitutes."
The rigid and accurate definition of a prostitute is someone who engages in sexual intercourse for money. Maybe I'll have to concede that one to you... What should I call it? Page 3 girl? Pin-up?
Second!
Any mention of "utopia" was purely rhetorical. Come on - you don't need me to elaborate on that. I do happen to have heard of the suffragettes and have been a lifelong feminist. I'm not opposing sexual expression. I'm not opposing nudity. I'm not opposing female sexual liberty. I'm certainly not opposing art depicting nudity and it's completely insane of you to even suggest any of these things. I oppose the sexual objectification, commercialization and sale of women, and I believe it is destructive and reflective of an inherent weakness of the human species.
I bear the burden of expressing myself accurately, but you seem to have taken misinterpretation to an expert level.


You'll have to give the 'fastest under the skin' award to MG, he got you retching didn't he? X D

1. You didn't actually contradict the "as long as everyone knows that she's a whore" bit... As I said in my first post, "leaving morality judgements aside". You just haven't managed to do that and continue to try and impress your version of morality on her choice of job. Side note, I bet with that video she's probably garnered more world wide attention than your compositions have. Must sting a little to see someone get so much attention for something as simple as getting their kit off and having a large rack. =)

Side note, an old dear friend of mine does pole dancing and burlesque as a hobby. Genuinely loves it, bit of an exhibitionist. I suppose she's a whore as well?

2. As a lifelong feminist, you should recognise and respect that women have the right to choose to portray themselves sexually or even sell their bodies if they so wish. While you might disagree with the decision, would not do so yourself (assuming your an actual woman rather than one of those poser male feminists), or even lament the fact that sexual appetites have created a demand for such things, who are you to cast stones at her choice? You presume that you have some sort of moral high ground to stare down your nose at her. You do not.