You're fucking kidding, right? The same idiots who shutdown your government because their insurance industry buddies didn't want health care?

You think they'll impeach Bush!? BWAAHAHAHAAHAHAHA

>> ^Hanover_Phist:

Sorry chicchorea, I forgot my /sarcasm tag.
I don't know much about American politics, but I always think it's weird when you guys only talk about impeaching the Democrat Presidents, when only months before the Republican President was doing that, and much worse.


People also spoke about impeaching Bush. A lot of people. I used to have a Bush For Ex-President shirt back in those days. I just think Clinton made it sexy.

Bush? >> ^Hanover_Phist:

Isn't it a little late to be talking about Impeaching Bush? Iraq and Afghanistan were years ago... to little to late.

Isn't it a little late to be talking about Impeaching Bush? Iraq and Afghanistan were years ago... to little to late.

@NetRunner
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-Only-the-Super-Rich-Can-Save-Us
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/myriam-miedzian/is-ralph-nader-on-to-some_b_298483.html
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-interviewed-by-Sonali-Kolhatkar

http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-Things-Are-a-Lot-Worse-than-We-Thought
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-talks-about-Barack-Obama-and-Hillary-Clinton
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-is-Obama-a-corporatist-like-BushCheney
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-on-Fannie-Freddie-and-more
http://videosift.com/video/Ron-Paul-And-Ralph-Nader-together-on-The-Situation-Room
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-on-Real-Time-September-26-2008
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-makes-Tucker-look-silly-once-again
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-on-Education
http://videosift.com/video/Nader-On-War-Profiteering-Eisenhower-Would-be-Proud
http://videosift.com/video/NADER-vs-O-REILLY-Pulling-Out-Of-Afghanistan-Another-9-11
http://videosift.com/video/Ralph-Nader-on-Organizing-Districts-for-Change
http://videosift.com/video/Why-the-Democrats-wont-Impeach-Bush-and-Cheney

>> ^garmachi:
Oh, and I'm willing to bet (but not to actually go find it myself) that there's equal use of this "tactic" by both sides, as well as footage.

I'd take that bet.

To be equivalent, you would have to find a clip from the floor of the House, during the debate preceding the vote on one of the major Republican initiatives from 1994-2006 (e.g. Impeachment, Bush tax cuts, AUMF for Iraq, Patriot, FISA, No child left behind, privatizing social security, etc.), where Democrats repeatedly yelled objection during the comments of several members of the opposition, just to slow down the proceedings.

I'm not going to try to prove the negative, but there's 5 free promotes/qualities to anyone who can prove me wrong.

If America couldn't bring itself to impeach Bush n friends for putting the economy where it is, for *lying* to us about so many countless points, and for ignoring the constitution point blank... I really don't think anyone's going to impeach Obama.

I grant you though there might be a better chance of it given that the R's have more balls and less sense, while the D's have lessor balls and ... well not much more sense than the R's. If any.

Well I'm getting there, not at the level of sift addiction I was at but this site is seriously in need of more rational conservative sense. Glad to see your still truckin' along too.

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
Glad to see you back!

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:
>> ^Farhad2000:
Reminds when the US impeached Clinton over getting a blow job. But didn't impeach Bush over illegally taking America to war.


Congress declares war, not presidents.

Glad to see you back!

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:
>> ^Farhad2000:
Reminds when the US impeached Clinton over getting a blow job. But didn't impeach Bush over illegally taking America to war.


Congress declares war, not presidents.

Sorry but no Chris Crocker on my Sift. I think your other videos with regards to impeaching Bush are far better then this publicity hunting POS.

>> ^gorgonheap:
>> ^Farhad2000:
Reminds when the US impeached Clinton over getting a blow job. But didn't impeach Bush over illegally taking America to war.

Congress declares war, not presidents.


I said Illegally taking the nation to war. Cherry picking information and frightening the nation congress into an armed conflict while giving no air to alternative views from European intelligence agencies is about as illegal as you can get.

PS: Afghanistan OK, Iraq WTF?

>> ^Farhad2000:
Reminds when the US impeached Clinton over getting a blow job. But didn't impeach Bush over illegally taking America to war.


Congress declares war, not presidents.

Reminds me of the time when the US impeached Clinton over getting a blow job. But didn't impeach Bush over illegally taking America to war.

The democratic leadership is resistant to impeaching Bush because they don't want to get fucked in the polls the way the GOP did after they impeached Clinton.

^ I think the latter is less likely because of the former, not in spite it. The divisiveness resulting from Clinton's impeachment is used an excuse to not impeach Bush. The county needs to heal and all that. Personally, I think it's a load of crap, but so the reasoning goes.