Now do the southern border!!! That would be much more exciting, the shootings, the drug trafficking, the dying of dehydration, the fence, the lack of fence, the fence with holes, the towers, the net migration of zero as mexicans move back home as the US economy keeps tanking, you know fun stuff!!!!

>> ^Yogi:

I think the only thing to really worry about here is the gulls dehydrating. I'm not sure because I'm not a vet but I wouldn't be feeding any animal chemicals without knowing what the hilarious consequences are.


Ya. Haven't watched the vid but dehydration was the first thing I thought of too. Laxatives basically cause diharreah. Can't be pleasant for the birds.

No where near as bad as using Drain-O, which is the last thing I heard of people doing to seaguls for a laugh.

I think the only thing to really worry about here is the gulls dehydrating. I'm not sure because I'm not a vet but I wouldn't be feeding any animal chemicals without knowing what the hilarious consequences are.

*promote

> I never realized basketball court was so much smaller.

its because they dehydrated the ice rink

Sad....always bothers me when there might be a chance something very minor could have been done to preserve the life of what they film. And yes, I realize it's the way of nature, but I always feel like men have disturbed their environment and even possibly the film crew caused something unknown to happen....so why shouldn't they attempt do a little good. Depends on the age of the lion and how long they typically live, but it didn't look like it was particularly old just starved/dehydrated.

One step closer to dehydrated water.

>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^marbles:
Ok pal. Gardasil contains aluminum, polysorbate 80 and sodium borate. [...] According to VAERS – the following reports have been listed for HPV, HPV2 & HPV 4 and "mental disorders." [...] But hey, the government and big business says it's perfectly safe, so all those victims are probably just full of shit.
Aluminum: Exceptionally low toxicity. The LD50 for aluminum is 6.207 g/kg. That comes out to over a pound for a 175lb person.
Polysorbate 80: Not found to be a carcinogen according to this study and this study. Here (PDF) is yet another study that finds no evidence of carcinogenicity. Also noteworthy is that the Gardasil vaccine contains 0.00005g of Polysorbate 80. The average daily intake from food is 2000x that.
Sodium Borate ("Borax"): The LD50 of Borax is 2.66 g/kg. That comes out to .46lbs to kill a 175lb person. This is probably the most "dangerous" chemical of the three but, again, we're talking about 0.000035g. Borax is used as an insecticide specifically because it's virtually harmless to humans. It kills insects via severe dehydration.
Now then... The problem with your VAERS statistics is that they're unverified, self-reported, and potentially self-diagnosed. Even if all the diagnosis were correct, they are correlation only with no research into causation. They are useless as evidence on their own.


I how the evil government is trying to poison us with vaccines! How do I know this? I looked it up on a government website! While entirely failing to understand how methodological research works! Yay!

Look there are plenty of legitimate problems with the pharmaceutical industry that don't rely on ridiculous notions. Read up on patent ever greening for a start. It's the same with that 9/11 bullshit. When you focus on the ridiculous, you make it harder for people with legitimate grievances to be taken seriously.

>> ^marbles:

Ok pal. Gardasil contains aluminum, polysorbate 80 and sodium borate. [...] According to VAERS – the following reports have been listed for HPV, HPV2 & HPV 4 and "mental disorders." [...] But hey, the government and big business says it's perfectly safe, so all those victims are probably just full of shit.

Aluminum: Exceptionally low toxicity. The LD50 for aluminum is 6.207 g/kg. That comes out to over a pound for a 175lb person.

Polysorbate 80: Not found to be a carcinogen according to this study and this study. Here (PDF) is yet another study that finds no evidence of carcinogenicity. Also noteworthy is that the Gardasil vaccine contains 0.00005g of Polysorbate 80. The average daily intake from food is 2000x that.

Sodium Borate ("Borax"): The LD50 of Borax is 2.66 g/kg. That comes out to .46lbs to kill a 175lb person. This is probably the most "dangerous" chemical of the three but, again, we're talking about 0.000035g. Borax is used as an insecticide specifically because it's virtually harmless to humans. It kills insects via severe dehydration.

Now then... The problem with your VAERS statistics is that they're unverified, self-reported, and potentially self-diagnosed. Even if all the diagnosis were correct, they are correlation only with no research into causation. They are useless as evidence on their own.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'sulphuric acid, sugar, dehydrating, carbon, charcoal, energy, water vapor' to 'sulphuric acid, sulfuric, sugar, dehydrating, carbon, charcoal, energy, water vapor' - edited by calvados

My cat discovered the wonders of fresh sink water and now will only drink from the sink. She gets in the sink when she's thirsty and I have to go turn it on for her. I went out of town for a week once and left her with my mom. When I got home, she was sick and I had to take her to the vet. She was dehydrated. I told my mom she would have to turn the sink, and she said she did "a couple of times."

Why are they spitting their water out? Gonna be dehydrated later...

Not if its dehydrated!!

So is it dehydration that causes the hangover or is it the obstructive sleep apnea that those who say the dehydration angle is just a myth? I am inclined to believe the dehydration angle more. While the symptoms of sleep apnea may be the same I would think it would be far easier to watch for that during studies... of course I would think that testing how dehydrated a subject is, or their B12 levels and all the other ideas would be easy to figure out too, so why it remains a mystery is a bit odd...
Then what about the caffeine dehydrating you more myth? I was under the impression it takes a lot of coffee/tea to reach that point and you are still better served with the fluid intake. Plus if you are susceptible to caffeine withdraw you are far better with the caffeine than skipping it.

How could a drug which is proven to be dehydrating when taken ONCE be any safer then a drug which has no known harmful sideeffects unless it's delivered in extremely high concentration or taken over a immense period of time.

I don't get how extacy can be the "safest drug around" ( i know there is "Kaht" but this does not seem to be a drug) or why cannabis should be more "dangerous" then LSD because of its psychological effects. (yea right)