>> ^coolhund:

>> ^Peroxide:
>> ^coolhund:
Both sides have nutjobs. Picking them out doesnt really make your point objectively.
Should have gone to John Christy or Svensmark and hundreds other reputable scientists instead.

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=903

You fail at internet.

Oh so youre picking some random nutjob site and take everything for granted thats written there.
Alright, Ill let you know when my website is ready that tells you to jump off a cliff.
But thanks for the ironic laugh at the end.


Show me your site, I expect it will have less funding from Exxon Mobil than any - denial of anthropogenic climate change - site you'll find.

Also, I have jumped off a cliff, it was fun. PLUS it only endangered my own life, not those of all the generations to come, like we are doing with climate change.

>> ^Yogi:

>> ^coolhund:
Both sides have nutjobs. Picking them out doesnt really make your point objectively.
Should have gone to John Christy or Svensmark and hundreds other reputable scientists instead.

There isn't a "reputable" scientist that doesn't understand global climate change is a fact and that humans are causing it, because as soon as such a person exists they lose their "reputation".


Yeah I know. And thats called complete and utter ignorance.
Have a nice life.

>> ^Peroxide:

>> ^coolhund:
Both sides have nutjobs. Picking them out doesnt really make your point objectively.
Should have gone to John Christy or Svensmark and hundreds other reputable scientists instead.

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=903

You fail at internet.


Oh so youre picking some random nutjob site and take everything for granted thats written there.
Alright, Ill let you know when my website is ready that tells you to jump off a cliff.
But thanks for the ironic laugh at the end.

>> ^coolhund:

Both sides have nutjobs. Picking them out doesnt really make your point objectively.
Should have gone to John Christy or Svensmark and hundreds other reputable scientists instead.


http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=903



You fail at internet.

>> ^coolhund:

Both sides have nutjobs. Picking them out doesnt really make your point objectively.
Should have gone to John Christy or Svensmark and hundreds other reputable scientists instead.


There isn't a "reputable" scientist that doesn't understand global climate change is a fact and that humans are causing it, because as soon as such a person exists they lose their "reputation".

Both sides have nutjobs. Picking them out doesnt really make your point objectively.
Should have gone to John Christy or Svensmark and hundreds other reputable scientists instead.

>> ^Xax:

He's tired of dealing with the crazies? And he's a Republican politician? Come on Chris, come to our side.


Unfortunately this is the exception with Christie, not the rule. Normally he's bombastically blasting away at people who're making sense, not people who aren't.

Couldn't he be saying a muslim american? Instead of muslim-american?

As in, an american who happens to be muslim, not in the sense of african-american.
>> ^hpqp:

Nice defence, but please, "Muslim-American"? Stop making religion sound like the equivalent of ethnic origin, it is not! Islam is not a race; Sohail Mohammed is simply an American of Indian origins who holds muslim beliefs.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

Been cycleing through the TNG library on Netflix - Worf's still got it.>> ^deathcow:

She looks like Christy Canyon wearing a Klingon chest belt like Worf had.

She looks like Christy Canyon wearing a Klingon chest belt like Worf had.

>> ^Sagemind:

The Globe and Mail:
http://
www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/student-cites-freedom-of-speech-after-suspension-for-online-videos/article2043954/
Oh, and here is his FB Page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jack-Christie/128772053860187


Oh for fuck's sake with the erroneous "Freedom of Speech" bullshit. Schools ain't the government passing laws.

If freedom of speech worked that way, the media would be filled with every crack pot and borderline psycho who had a personal axe to gri... ok, that's a bad analogy, but FoS still doesn't protect him.

The Globe and Mail:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/student-cites-freedom-of-speech-after-suspension-for-online-videos/article2043954/

Oh, and here is his FB Page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jack-Christie/128772053860187

My thoughts exactly. I'll stick with Redmonton.
>> ^Tingles:

ah BC. Home sweet home. Lowest paying wages, highest cost of living in the country.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

Hunter S. Thompson? Hubble Space Telescope? Health Sciences and Technology? High Speed Train?


If you have to ask, you can't afford it. Neither can we, that's the point- if you follow.

>> ^Winstonfield_Pennypacker:

Fact is that the federal government doesn't need 4+ TRILLION dollars to perform its constitutionally mandated functions. It takes that money to do a lot of unnecessary crap that buys votes (particularly union votes). The government could easily be trimmed back to a lean 1 trillion dollars by divesting itself of foolish entanglements in social experimentation and other welfare entitlements.
The states that are facing fiscal collapse (New York, Wisconsin, New Jersey, Illinois, California, et al) are almost UNIVERSALLY states that been controlled by decades of left-wing liberal "tax & spend" nanny state philosophy. The Chris Christies and Walkers of the nation were voted in to clean up the mess. To put it plainly, people got tired of dealing with children-liars who promise the world while brooming problems onto the next generation - and so they hired some grown-ups.
The kid in this vid doesn't come off as 'destroying' anything except his own credibility. It's an open display of a person who is not a critical thinker, and who has little or no understanding of economics, or civics.


Those states also have much higher income per capita than the red states. They're doing fine economically, just not quite balancing the budget.

It's a bit paradoxical that the states with the highest income per capita, which contribute much more to the Federal Government's income than they recieve in spending, are blue states, while the states with the lowest income per capita, which contribute much less to the federal government's income than they recieve in spending, are red states.

Maybe the reason the people in the red states think the government doesn't do jack shit for them is because they're in a state with both a poor population AND low taxes so as a consequence the government doesn't have the budget to do jack shit.