search results matching tag: cannibalism

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (102)     Sift Talk (4)     Blogs (12)     Comments (223)   

renatojj (Member Profile)

FACE/OFF: Naked Man shot while eating another man's face

FACE/OFF: Naked Man shot while eating another man's face

shang says...

Some are thinking the naked crazy man was Luka Magnotta

in 2010 he made 5 videos of him torturing and killing cats that showed up on liveleak, ogrishforum, bestgore, theync

then just recently this week a "snuff" film came out of a man in hoodie killing a tied up man, then dismembering the body, having sex with it and then eating it.

that video became known recently as "1 lunatic 1 icepick" his previous vids were "1 boy 2 kittens"

Anyhow I don't mean to gross out, but his myspace had listed him being in Miami

and after all these video leaks, and the constant hunt for Luka Magnotta since 2010 about the animal vids and now him moving up to humans, some speculate that it was him that went nuts on that homeless man.

how they linked luka to the 1 lunatic 1 icepick vid is the same poster on the wall from the 2010 vids with the animals and same poster on the recent vid, also his old modeling video had the same music in it as the murder video also.


anyhow hopefully that was Luka and the cops just don't realize how deep the story goes yet, if it's not Luka then I hope they catch the cannibal asap!

Actual Cannibal Shia LaBeouf

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Actual Cannibal Shia LaBeouf' to 'cannibal, Shia LaBeouf, satire, song' - edited by xxovercastxx

Actual Cannibal Shia LaBeouf

Actual Cannibal Shia LaBeouf

The vegetable song

Dosing cats with Uncle Sam

therealblankman says...

>> ^jonny:

If I said I was eating lunch with my friend, would you think I was a cannibal?
>> ^therealblankman:
Dosing a cat with Uncle Sam? Funny, to me it looks like it was dosed with drugs.



Well no- there's no ambiguity in that statement. If however you said something like "I'm having my friend for lunch.", then that's another matter.

Dosing cats with Uncle Sam

Can Wisdom Save Us? – Documentary on preventing collapse.

dag says...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

We are the Mycon. We are part of Juffo-Wup.>> ^jonny:

Shit... the fungus has already infected too much of his brain. I don't think we can save him. Not what he was, anyway. We can cannibalize his brain though. It won't hurt him much. Just a little pinch....
>> ^dag:
I'm really happy to have Sapience Film as a sponsor. This looks like a great project and I've already pledged $25 on Kickstarter to make this happen. Join me!


Can Wisdom Save Us? – Documentary on preventing collapse.

jonny says...

Shit... the fungus has already infected too much of his brain. I don't think we can save him. Not what he was, anyway. We can cannibalize his brain though. It won't hurt him much. Just a little pinch....

>> ^dag:

I'm really happy to have Sapience Film as a sponsor. This looks like a great project and I've already pledged $25 on Kickstarter to make this happen. Join me!

Ron Swanson on Vegan Bacon

Grace's Anatomy

Ian Mckellen on Religion and Homosexuality

shinyblurry says...

You can't call God immutable, then show that he can obviously change (have fulfilling relationships, have changing feelings, make decisions to do things), and say we can't understand how he's immutable. You claimed immutability. I didn't. I'm just showing you the logical consequences of the words you're using. After you say words, you can't go back and say you don't know what the words mean, or that they don't mean the same thing when we're talking about God. Again, words have meaning.

There are massive internal inconsistencies in your bible story. "God is immutable" is not a compatible statement with "God has emotional reactions to things people do", or "God has ongoing interactive relationships with people". Yes, taken to it's logical conclusion, God is a frozen thing, which is clearly incompatible with omnipotence, as you pointed out yourself. Either God is not immutable, or significant portions of the bible story are false, including every part where God does anything, feels anything, and especially claims of omni-anything.


I am applying immutability to His essential nature, I am not saying God never changes. To say God cannot change is to say that God cannot do anything or be anything. The thought that total changelessness is a prerequisite of perfection is a platonian ideal, not a Christian one. How can perfection be actualized if it is not manifest? Who God is is what always stays the same. He is perfectly good. What God does can change. He manifests that good in many different ways.

About God's supposed immutability. Why would he have two covenants with us if his basic nature never changes? Why would he have one set of rules before Christ, and another set after? Why was he such a warring murderous genocidal badass in the OT, but relatively passive in the NT, and totally absent in daily affairs since then? It seems to me he has changed plenty over the years.

His first covenant was exclusively with the Israelities to create the conditions for the coming of the Messiah. The second covenant was established for the entire world. It takes a student of the bible to understand that the entire OT is about Jesus Christ. Everything that is going on there is preparing the way for the Messiah, and is a picture of His coming. For instance, the story of Abraham and Issac is a picture of the sacrifice the Father made. Consider this video:



Not only a picture, but containing numerous prophecies. When Jesus said "My God My God why have you forsaken Me?".. He wasn't crying out to the Father because He felt abandoned, He was quoting Psalm 22, to let everyone there know He was fulfilling it. If you read it take note that when it was written (600 years before Christ) that crucifixion hadn't been invented yet.

Regarding the Old Testament, you should consider the other side of the coin. You may consider the actions of God the Father harsh, but then you should also consider the actions of the people He was dealing with. Consider the fact that after He brought the jews out of egypt, delivering them from hundreds of years of slavery, and doing non stop miracles in front of them, even personally leading them through the desert, that as soon as Moses disappeared for a few days, they all descended into barbarism and paganism and made golden calfs to worship saying "this is the God that brought us out of Egypt". Even after all that God had done for them, they were ready to betray Him at the drop of a hat. This is why God dealt harshly with them, because it was the only thing they understood, and that even just barely. The people whom you claim genocide (which wasn't genocide, btw..they drove them out, they didn't exterminate them) were given 400 years to repent, and the reason they were being judged because they were so corrupt that they ritually sacrificed their children to demons. We know from history that people who did this kind of thing also engaged in things like cannibalism. They weren't nice people, and even then God gave them 400 years to change.

How can God get angry when something happens if he always knew it would happen? Jesus seems to be a completely different dude from God of the OT. I like Jesus. God the father I don't

Foreknowledge doesn't rule out an emotional response when it happens. It's not easy to watch your children betraying you I am sure.

I'm glad to hear you like Jesus. And He loves you. The thing to understand is that Jesus is the Fathers heart; they are one. You have a negative impression of the Father because you disagree with how He dealt with the israelities, but you should see the other side of it and understand what He did for us through His Son. Christs very words came from Him:

John 12:50

I know that his command leads to eternal life. So whatever I say is just what the Father has told me to say."

John 8:28

So Jesus said, "When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am [the one I claim to be] and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me.

John 5:19

So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of his own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever the Father does, that the Son does likewise.

Christ did not come of His own accord, He came because the Father sent Him. He died on the cross to give us forgiveness for sins and eternal life, which was the Fathers plan all along. God doesn't want to destroy us, He wants to save us, and He was even willing to give His only Son to do it. So if you can understand the OT in that light, maybe you can understand God the Father a little better.

As far as not being active today, God is always working all the time. I see it clearly, but it takes spiritual discernment to notice it. You need the Holy Spirit for that. God is really hiding in plain sight.

>> ^messenger:
@shinyblurry
Words have meaning.
You can't call God immutable, then show that he can obviously change (have fulfilling relationships, have changing feelings, make decisions to do things), and say we can't understand how he's immutable. You claimed immutability. I didn't. I'm just showing you the logical consequences of the words you're using. After you say words, you can't go back and say you don't know what the words mean, or that they don't mean the same thing when we're talking about God. Again, words have meaning.
There are massive internal inconsistencies in your bible story. "God is immutable" is not a compatible statement with "God has emotional reactions to things people do", or "God has ongoing interactive relationships with people". Yes, taken to it's logical conclusion, God is a frozen thing, which is clearly incompatible with omnipotence, as you pointed out yourself. Either God is not immutable, or significant portions of the bible story are false, including every part where God does anything, feels anything, and especially claims of omni-anything.
About God's supposed immutability. Why would he have two covenants with us if his basic nature never changes? Why would he have one set of rules before Christ, and another set after? Why was he such a warring murderous genocidal badass in the OT, but relatively passive in the NT, and totally absent in daily affairs since then? It seems to me he has changed plenty over the years.
How can God get angry when something happens if he always knew it would happen? Jesus seems to be a completely different dude from God of the OT. I like Jesus. God the father I don't.

Louis C.K. on Evolution



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon