The look on the brunettes face was quite humorous.

>> ^rougy:
I call dibbs on the brunette!
(Kate's the one on the left)


Pick? I'll take em both thanks!

I call dibbs on the brunette!

(Kate's the one on the left)

There's no stopping it.

I don't think anybody believes they're getting older, not really. I'm 46. Right now I'm watching some German lady, same age as me, dance around on her webcam, and she's pretty hot. Last night it was a 51-year-old brunette from Massachusetts who was still pretty damn fine.

I think that, with a little effort, we can at least stay younger for longer than our parents and grand parents did.

Life may not really begin at forty, but it doesn't have to end there.

Happy Birthday.

(what I'm really saying is, will you dance around on your webcam for me?)

i don't even see the code anymore. just redheads, brunettes...
edit: btw, yours was blonde

Okay. First, I'll point out that you still don't have any sources that repeat your own claim that the Democratic-Republican party simply disappeared into thin air, and that there was a clear and clean break between that party and the Democratic Party.

Second, you either didn't understand my explanation of why the Republican party would be different, or well, I guess there is no other real explanation, because you laid out a straw man instead of responding to what I actually said.

Third, your fixation with the logo is unhealthy. Seriously, if we change the logo now to a Fox to mock Fox News, does that mean Bill O'Reilly founded the Democratic party? I'm not being entirely facetious -- if the Democratic-Republican party didn't have a logo before, but during the Jackson presidency they adopted it to spite the people calling him Jackass, does that make him the founder of the Democratic-Republican party? I think it makes him a Jackass, but that's not what we're talking about.

But really, this all comes down to #1. You said the answers.com page was accurate. Here's some of what you deemed accurate:

Encyclopedia Britannica:

In the 1790s a group of Thomas Jefferson's supporters called themselves "Democratic Republicans" or "Jeffersonian Republicans" to demonstrate their belief in the principle of popular government and their opposition to monarchism. The party adopted its present name in the 1830s, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson.

So, one party, that changed its name.

US History Encylcopedia:

By the end of Madison's presidency and throughout Monroe's two terms, known as the "Era of Good Feeling," the Democratic Republican Party largely abandoned its minimalism and supported tariff, banking, and improvements policies originally supported by its Federalist opponents.

After the retirement of James Monroe, the newly renamed "Democratic" Party came to rally around the candidacy of Andrew Jackson. Jackson steered the party back toward its minimalist origins.

The Law Encyclopedia entry starts with:

The modern Democratic party is the descendant of the Democratic-Republican party, an early-nineteenth-century political organization led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Also known as the Jeffersonians, the Democratic-Republican party began as an antifederalist group, opposed to strong, centralized government. The party was officially established at a national nominating convention in 1832. It dropped the Republican portion of its name in 1840.

They don't all agree about the exact timing of the change, but they say it was a change in name, not a newly founded party.

In the course of searching again today, I found a couple original-source documents:

Thomas Jefferson Randolph (Thomas Jefferson's grandson) said at the 1872 Democratic convention that he'd spent 80 years of his life in the Democratic-Republican party (source), and Inquiry Into the Origin and Course of Political Parties in the United States By Martin Van Buren, where he discusses the topic at excruciating length, but frequently talks about the roots of the Democratic party beginning with Jefferson.

Look, you're just wrong. You can disagree with the history as it's written, but that makes you, not me, the revisionist.

It's okay. I don't blame you for being mad. You don't like the thought that Thomas Jefferson and William Jefferson Clinton were both from the same party. Here's a thought, maybe we should change the logo to a brunette sucking cock, to commemorate the founding of Limbaugh's Clinton's Democrat (as opposed to Democratic) party. The logo change, that's really all it takes to found a new party.

Someone call Hillary and let her know she won the nomination at the Democrat National Convention, where only Michigan and Florida count. Best not show her the new logo though.

the brunette ann coulter

I'm tired of hearing about the strife in the Middle East; either let them fight it out, are get rid of ALL of them. Then the real war can start: the short people against the tall people!

Or maybe the blonds against the brunettes. No? How about people that can whistle vs. those who can't?

> so aerosil nano powder is indistinguishable from milk

Yes, breastmilk, actually, I'm actually looking for a grant right now as well as 100 nursing mothers, need to be brunette, under 23 yrs and less than 140 lbs due to odd constraints on the tests.

>> ^MarineGunrock:
>> ^Eklek:
er, we do have a travel channel..
We urgently need africa, europe, latin(o), arctic to complete the set.

We most certainly do NOT urgently need a Latino, Africa or arctic channel - for ANY reason.
They would have a grand total of like, 15 videos in them.

Yea...and we need a *brunette, *underwaterbasketweaving and *spelunking channels as well.

Thank God Eve was a hot brunette.

>> ^thepinky:
When I speak of insanity, I'm talking about the guy that goes around smacking people and claiming that he is healing them by the power of God and to the people who believe it. I am not referring to the woman's decision to become heterosexual.
Because of my limited understanding, I do not presume to know what factors influence sexual orientation, but claiming that choice plays a role has become so taboo that perhaps we fear that discussion. Couldn't choice at least occasionally have something to do with it? Why can't we accept that this woman made a decision about her sexual orientation and leave it at that? Isn't it arrogant to assume that you have such a complete knowledge about the human mind that you know it is impossible for her to decide she isn't gay? Can't we have a say in what we do and who we're attracted to? Who are we to tell her she's gay?
I'm not trying to make any statements about whether same-sex attraction is a choice or not, I just wanted to pose the question because not everyone is the same and sometimes the mind is more powerful than we give it credit for.
So she wants to be straight. I don't care much for the way in which she came to that conclusion, but it's her life and it was her decision to believe that con artist's nonsense. If by some miracle I had found myself in that situation, I would have smacked that guy upside the head.


Choice is not a factor when it comes to preference, only when it comes to action. For example: I'd say I have little to no choice over the fact that I'm sexually attracted to females that are asian or latina with caramel colored skin, brown eyes and brunette hair. But, I do have the choice to act on those preferences just as a homosexual has the choice to act on his or her preference.

Now what we need to do as a society is stop criticizing them for choosing to act upon their preference. I think you are an intelligent individual, but your dogma is keeping you from practicing critical thought at certain times.

I think my favorite part is that the brunette is caught masturbating to the photos later on.

>> ^uzema:
I don't get it, what does this have to do with Tina Fey?

Watch the brunette behind him on the right. She acts as if he's talking about her.

^ i preferred 2, yeah, but this was ok and i always liked beast

plus, i thought rebecca romijn looked even hotter as a brunette